PURPOSEFUL UN-AVAILMENT: WHY A JUSTICE BRENNAN APPROACH TO PERSONAL JURISDICTION WOULD SAVE INDIANA FROM THE PROBLEMS OF NICASTRO.Published in:Indiana Law Review, 2013, v. 46, n. 4, p. 1347, doi. 10.18060/18098By:HANSON, SPENSER K.Publication type:Article
COMMERCIAL PURPOSE AS CONSTITUTIONAL PURPOSE: REEVALUATING ASAHI THROUGH THE LENS OF INTERNATIONAL PATENT LITIGATION.Published in:Columbia Law Review, 2011, v. 111, n. 3, p. 624By:Huppert, Matthew R.Publication type:Article
GOODYEAR DUNLOP TIRES OPERATIONS V. BROWN.Published in:University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 2014, v. 36, n. 2, p. 229By:McCarroll, KathyPublication type:Article
IF IT WASN'T ON PURPOSE, CAN A COURT TAKE IT PERSONALLY?: UNTANGLING ASAHi'S MESS THAT J. MCINTYRE DID NOT.Published in:2013By:Higdon, StephenPublication type:Opinion