Organizational Consequences of Professional Consensus: Lawyers and Selection of Judges.
- Published in:
- Administrative Science Quarterly, 1966, v. 11, n. 1, p. 78, doi. 10.2307/2391395
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "AMERICAN Bar Association. Standing Committee on Federal Judiciary"
Results: 7
1
2
The Committee on Federal Judiciary: What It Is and How It Works.
- Published in:
- American Bar Association Journal, 1977, v. 63, n. 6, p. 803
- Publication type:
- Article
3
How You Rate Depends on Who Investigates: Partisan Bias in ABA Ratings of US Courts of Appeals Nominees, 1958–2020.
- Published in:
- Political Research Quarterly, 2023, v. 76, n. 4, p. 1723, doi. 10.1177/10659129231175169
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Bias and the Bar: Evaluating the ABA Ratings of Federal Judicial Nominees.
- Published in:
- Political Research Quarterly, 2012, v. 65, n. 4, p. 827, doi. 10.1177/1065912911421011
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
CHOOSING JUDGES: A BUMPY ROAD TO WOMEN'S EQUALITY AND A LONG WAY TO GO.
- Published in:
- Michigan State Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 5, p. 1499
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
How two new rules for self-authentication will save you time and money.
- Published in:
- Judicature, 2016, v. 100, n. 4, p. 34
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
WHERE ONE SITS AFFECTS WHERE OTHERS STAND.
- Published in:
- Judicature, 2014, v. 98, n. 1, p. 35
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article