COMMON IGNORANCE:MEDICAL MALPRACTICE LAW AND THE MISCONCEIVED APPLICATION OF THE "COMMON KNOWLEDGE" AND "RES IPSA LOQUITUR" DOCTRINES.
- Published in:
- Touro Law Review, 2015, v. 31, n. 3, p. 521
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching DE "ADMISSIBLE evidence lawsuits"
Results: 16
1
2
EVIDENTIARY USE OF PHOTOGRAPHIC IDENTIFICATION: IS IT TIME FOR NEW YORK TO REEVALUATE ITS SINGULAR EXCEPTION?
- Published in:
- Touro Law Review, 2014, v. 30, n. 4, p. 945
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
THE PRACTICAL APPROACH: HOW THE ROBERTS COURT HAS ENHANCED CLASS ACTION PROCEDURE BY STRATEGICALLY CARVING AT THE EDGES.
- Published in:
- Akron Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Genomic Test Results and the Courtroom: The Roles of Experts and Expert Testimony.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2016, v. 44, n. 1, p. 205, doi. 10.1177/1073110516644211
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
The admissibility of expert evidence in the context of an amended Part 33: R v H [2014] EWCA Crim 1555.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2014, v. 78, n. 6, p. 457, doi. 10.1177/0022018314557415a
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
How Sound Is the Science? Applying Daubert to Biomechanical Experts' Injury Causation Opinions.
- Published in:
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2016, v. 73, n. 2, p. 1063
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
ADMISSIBILITY VERSUS SUFFICIENCY: CONTROLLING THE QUALITY OF EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY.
- Published in:
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2015, v. 50, n. 5, p. 1057
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
CONFESSIONS IN AN INTERNATIONAL AGE: RE-EXAMINING ADMISSIBILITY THROUGH THE LENS OF FOREIGN INTERROGATIONS.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2016, v. 115, n. 2, p. 277
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
THE LEGAL AND SCIENTIFIC CHALLENGE OF BLACK BOX EXPERTISE.
- Published in:
- University of Queensland Law Journal, 2019, v. 38, n. 2, p. 237
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Walking the Fine Line of Admissibility: Should Statements of Racial Bias Fall Under an Exception to Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b)?
- Published in:
- American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 2015, v. 39, n. 1, p. 131
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
Personal Responsibility in Product Liability: Who Is Responsible for What and Why?
- Published in:
- American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 2014, v. 37, n. 3, p. 541
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
"Getting Information off the Internet Is like Taking a Drink from a Fire Hydrant"--The Murky Area of Authenticating Website Screenshots in the Courtroom.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 2013, v. 37, n. 1, p. 65
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Admitting and Excluding General Causation Expert Testimony: The Eleventh Circuit Construct.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 2013, v. 37, n. 1, p. 47
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
The Enduring Quality of an Alluring Mistake: Why One Person's Intentions Cannot--And Never Could--Be Evidence of Another Person's Conduct.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 2013, v. 37, n. 2, p. 339
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
CRIMINAL LAW--DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE--BREATH TEST ADMISSIBILITY.
- Published in:
- North Dakota Law Review, 2020, v. 95, n. 2, p. 415
- Publication type:
- Article
16
YOU SHALL NOT PASS!!: HOW KIA MOTORS CORP. V. RUIZ DRASTICALLY RAISED THE BAR FOR THE ADMISSION OF OTHER SIMILAR INCIDENTS EVIDENCE FOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY CLAIMS IN TEXAS.
- Published in:
- Texas Tech Law Review, 2015, v. 47, n. 4, p. 939
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article