Works matching DE "ACCESS control of public records"
1
- Alexandria, 2014, v. 25, n. 1/2, p. 31, doi. 10.7227/ALX.0019
- ESPLEY, SUZY;
- CARPENTIER, FLORENT;
- POP, RADU;
- MEDJKOUNE, LEÏLA
- Article
2
- Government Technology, 2010, v. 23, n. 2, p. 50
- Article
3
- Government Technology, 2008, v. 21, n. 9, p. 58
- Article
4
- Political Studies, 1981, v. 29, n. 2, p. 309
- Article
6
- Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 2008, v. 85, n. 3, p. 549, doi. 10.1177/107769900808500305
- Article
7
- Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 2001, v. 78, n. 1, p. 45, doi. 10.1177/107769900107800104
- Halstuk, Martin E.;
- Chamberlin, Bill F.
- Article
8
- Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 1998, v. 75, n. 3, p. 464, doi. 10.1177/107769909807500303
- Bunker, Matthew D.;
- Davis, Charles N.
- Article
9
- Radical Teacher, 2006, n. 77, p. 12
- Article
11
- Nature Immunology, 2002, v. 3, n. 12, p. 1113, doi. 10.1038/ni1202-1113
- Darlow, John M.;
- Stott, David I.
- Article
12
- Journal of Library Administration, 2015, v. 55, n. 2, p. 92, doi. 10.1080/01930826.2014.995543
- Million, A. J.;
- S. Bossaller, Jenny
- Article
13
- Family Court Review, 2001, v. 39, n. 2, p. 223, doi. 10.1111/j.174-1617.2001.tb00606.x
- Article
14
- California Law Review, 1956, v. 44, n. 2, p. 305, doi. 10.2307/3478732
- Article
15
- Perspectives in Clinical Research, 2012, v. 3, n. 4, p. 122, doi. 10.4103/2229-3485.103592
- Article
16
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2017, v. 2017, n. 4, p. 1385
- Article
17
- History Australia, 2009, v. 6, n. 2, p. 43.1, doi. 10.2104/ha090043
- Article
19
- New York University Law Review, 2011, v. 86, n. 6, p. 1814
- Schwartz, Paul M.;
- Solove, Daniel J.
- Article
20
- Review of Public Data Use, 1978, v. 6, n. 6, p. 23
- Article
21
- Assessment Journal, 1997, v. 4, n. 2, p. 83
- Article
22
- Journal of Radio Studies, 2007, v. 14, n. 2, p. 178, doi. 10.1080/10955040701583288
- Smith, Mark;
- Clark, Elizabeth
- Article
23
- American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 2003, v. 77, n. 1, p. 9
- Article
24
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2017, v. 85, n. 3, p. 815
- Article
25
- Cardozo Law Review, 2016, v. 37, n. 3, p. 891
- Article
27
- New Directions for Evaluation, 1999, n. 81, p. 33, doi. 10.1002/ev.1125
- Article
28
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2009, v. 24, n. 3, p. 1019
- Article
29
- African Research & Documentation, 2008, n. 106, p. 59, doi. 10.1017/s0305862x0001863x
- Article
30
- Newspaper Research Journal, 2004, v. 25, n. 4, p. 95, doi. 10.1177/073953290402500410
- Article
31
- Indiana Law Review, 2019, v. 52, n. 3, p. 455, doi. 10.18060/23839
- Article
32
- Indiana Law Review, 2017, v. 50, n. 4, p. 1215, doi. 10.18060/4806.1167
- CHINN, SCOTT;
- PULLIAM, DANIEL E.
- Article
33
- Library Philosophy & Practice, 2010, p. 1
- Article
34
- Journal of the Missouri Bar, 2023, v. 79, n. 3, p. 120
- Article
35
- Journal of the Missouri Bar, 2023, v. 79, n. 3, p. 114
- Bates, Jeffrey;
- Lynch, Gary W.
- Article
36
- Journal of the Missouri Bar, 2023, v. 79, n. 3, p. 110
- Howard, Diane C.;
- Lebeck, Christopher W.
- Article
37
- Journal of the Missouri Bar, 2023, v. 79, n. 3, p. 106
- Article
38
- Journal of the Missouri Bar, 2009, v. 65, n. 6, p. 324
- Article
39
- Seattle University Law Review, 2013, v. 36, n. 3, p. 1553
- Article
40
- Florida Bar Journal, 2000, v. 74, n. 1, p. 63
- Article
41
- Albany Law Review, 2003, v. 66, n. 4, p. 1089
- Article
42
- Connecticut Bar Journal, 2018, v. 91, n. 4, p. 350
- Article
43
- Widener Law Journal, 2014, v. 23, n. 2, p. 571
- Article
44
- Widener Law Journal, 2014, v. 23, n. 2, p. 539
- Article
45
- Widener Law Journal, 2014, v. 23, n. 2, p. 523
- Article
46
- Widener Law Journal, 2014, v. 23, n. 2, p. 505
- Article
47
- Widener Law Journal, 2014, v. 23, n. 2, p. 475
- Article
48
- Widener Law Journal, 2011, v. 21, n. 1, p. 137
- Article
49
- Society, 1999, v. 36, n. 5, p. 70, doi. 10.1007/BF02686155
- Article
50
- History Today, 1952, v. 2, n. 5, p. 358
- Article