Works matching DE "ABSTENTION doctrine (Law)"
1
- California Law Review, 2023, v. 111, p. 1705, doi. 10.15779/Z38RN3085H
- Article
2
- Modern Italy, 2020, v. 25, n. 3, p. 279, doi. 10.1017/mit.2020.29
- Bracalente, Bruno;
- Pellegrino, Davide;
- Forcina, Antonio
- Article
3
- St. John's Law Review, 2017, v. 91, n. 3, p. 703
- Article
4
- American University Law Review, 2022, v. 71, n. 3, p. 1105
- Article
5
- Gonzaga Law Review, 2011, v. 47, n. 3, p. 589
- Article
6
- Review of Economic Studies, 2016, v. 83, n. 2, p. 547, doi. 10.1093/restud/rdw001
- ELLINGSEN, TORE;
- PALTSEVA, ELENA
- Article
7
- Actualidad Jurídica (1578-956X), 2016, n. 43, p. 194
- Article
8
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2019, v. 2019, n. 6, p. 1551
- Article
9
- Kansas Law Review, 2016, v. 64, n. 3, p. 793
- Article
10
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2016, v. 2016, n. 2, p. 425
- Article
11
- William & Mary Law Review, 2021, v. 62, n. 4, p. 1397
- Article
12
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2022, v. 89, n. 8, p. 2109
- Article
13
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 1, p. 390
- Article
14
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 2, p. 763
- Article
15
- Arizona Law Review, 2012, v. 54, n. 4, p. 939
- Article
16
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2018, v. 68, n. 3, p. 943
- Article
17
- Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 2019, v. 51, n. 1/2, p. 359
- Article
18
- American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 2013, v. 87, n. 4, p. 483
- Article
19
- Berkeley Journal of International Law, 2014, v. 32, n. 1, p. 144
- Article
20
- Mercer Law Review, 2022, v. 73, n. 3, p. 1043
- Article
21
- Alabama Law Review, 2016, v. 67, n. 4, p. 1019
- Article
22
- Akron Law Review, 2019, v. 52, n. 2, p. 275
- Article
23
- Tennessee Law Review, 2013, v. 81, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
24
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2017, v. 74, n. 9, p. 38
- Article
25
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2017, v. 74, n. 9, p. 30
- Article
26
- Journal of College & University Law, 2014, v. 40, n. 2, p. 247
- Article
27
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2021, v. 69, n. 4, p. 859
- Article
29
- South Carolina Law Review, 2012, v. 63, n. 3, p. 671
- Article
30
- Journal of Sports Creativity, 2019, v. 10, n. 2, p. 205
- Ataellah, Louakhch;
- Ameur, Cherfi
- Article
31
- Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale, 2013, v. 33, n. 101, p. 61
- Truglia, Francesco Giovanni
- Article
32
- Juridical Tribune / Tribuna Juridica, 2015, v. 5, n. 2, p. 25
- Article
33
- Boston University Law Review, 2012, v. 92, n. 6, p. 1771
- Article
34
- New York Law School Law Review, 2014, v. 59, n. 1, p. 211
- Article
35
- New York University Annual Survey of American Law, 2022, v. 78, n. 1, p. 137
- Article
36
- Nevada Law Journal, 2011, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
37
- Washington Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 3, p. 1153
- Article
38
- Texas Law Review, 2013, v. 92, n. 1, p. 1
- Pfander, James E.;
- Nazemi, Nassim
- Article
39
- Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 3, p. 1191
- Article
40
- Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 2012, v. 13, n. 1, p. 75, doi. 10.1515/1565-3404.1285
- Article
41
- University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 2013, v. 74, n. 4, p. 759, doi. 10.5195/lawreview.2013.298
- Article
42
- Georgia Law Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 4, p. 1161
- Jordan, Samuel P.;
- Bader, Christopher K.
- Article
43
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2021, v. 169, n. 8, p. 2291
- Article
44
- Stanford Law Review, 2024, v. 76, n. 6, p. 1323
- Article
45
- Analise Social, 2024, v. 59, n. 251, p. 2, doi. 10.31447/2022119
- PLAZA-COLODRO, CAROLINA;
- LISI, MARCO
- Article
48
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 3, p. 845
- Article
49
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2012, v. 65, n. 2, p. 509
- Article
50
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2014, v. 45, n. 2, p. 347
- Article