Works matching Cruel %26 unusual punishment
1
- Touro Law Review, 2021, v. 37, n. 1, p. 347
- Article
2
- North Carolina Law Review, 2016, v. 94, n. 3, p. 817
- Article
3
- Virginia Law Review, 2018, v. 104, n. 3, p. 547
- Article
4
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2014, v. 37, n. 3, p. 1065
- Article
5
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 2017, v. 25, n. 3, p. 327
- Article
6
- Iowa Law Review, 2014, v. 100, n. 1, p. 323
- Article
7
- Rutgers Law Journal, 2013, v. 43, n. 4, p. 635
- Article
8
- Emory Law Journal, 2012, v. 61, n. 6, p. 1445
- Article
9
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2018, v. 31, n. 1, p. 111
- Article
10
- Loyola Journal of Public Interest Law, 2014, v. 16, n. 1, p. 99
- Article
11
- Pace Law Review, 2021, v. 42, n. 1, p. 223
- Article
12
- American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 2018, v. 42, n. 1, p. 185
- Article
13
- Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 2011, v. 18, n. 3, p. 329, doi. 10.1080/13218719.2011.599927
- Article
14
- Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2025, v. 19, n. 1, p. 61, doi. 10.1007/s11572-024-09735-6
- Article
15
- Journal of Theoretical & Philosophical Criminology, 2010, v. 2, n. 3, p. 1
- Bersot, Heather Y.;
- Arrigo, Bruce A.
- Article
16
- Journal of Corporation Law, 2019, v. 44, n. 3, p. 559
- Article
17
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 5, p. 1955
- Article
18
- Denver Law Review, 2018, v. 95, n. 3, p. 781
- Article
19
- Denver Law Review, 2017, v. 94, n. 2, p. 385
- Article
20
- Denver Law Review, 2017, v. 94, n. 2, p. 385
- Article
21
- Journal of Law & the Biosciences, 2019, v. 6, n. 1, p. 184, doi. 10.1093/jlb/lsz014
- Article
22
- Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 1972, v. 63, n. 4, p. 484, doi. 10.2307/1141799
- Article
23
- Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 1968, v. 59, n. 3, p. 405
- Article
24
- William & Mary Law Review, 2014, v. 56, n. 2, p. 531
- Article
25
- New York University Law Review, 2015, v. 90, n. 4, p. 1331
- Article
26
- European Journal of Law & Economics, 1998, v. 5, n. 3, p. 235, doi. 10.1023/A:1008681616164
- Palmer, John P.;
- Henderson, John
- Article
27
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2014, v. 54, n. 2, p. 109
- Cairns, Jason A.;
- Koehler, Jonathan J.
- Article
28
- Iowa Law Review, 2012, v. 98, n. 1, p. 69
- Zydney Mannheimer, Michael J.
- Article
29
- Cornell Law Review, 2017, v. 102, n. 2, p. 413
- Smith, Robert J.;
- Robinson, Zoë
- Article
30
- Denver University Law Review, 2012, v. 90, n. 1, p. 1
- HAFEMEISTER, THOMAS L.;
- GEORGE, JEFF
- Article
31
- Revista de Derecho Puertorriqueño, 2008, v. 47, n. 2, p. 205
- Article
32
- Ateneo Law Journal, 2009, v. 54, n. 3, p. 568
- Rosales, Maria Luisa Isabel L.
- Article
33
- Emory Law Journal, 2012, v. 62, n. 2, p. 407
- Article
34
- International Journal of Politics, Culture & Society, 2001, v. 14, n. 4, p. 729, doi. 10.1023/A:1011118906363
- Article
35
- New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement, 2015, v. 41, n. 1, p. 225
- Article
36
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2016, v. 40, n. 1, p. 115
- LEVICK, MARSHA;
- SHAH, RIYA SAHA
- Article
37
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2015, v. 38, n. 3, p. 423
- Article
38
- Modern Law Review, 2012, v. 75, n. 2, p. 261, doi. 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00899.x
- Article
39
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2016, v. 34, n. 2/3, p. 460, doi. 10.1002/bsl.2216
- Chavira, Cynthia;
- Botello, Timothy;
- Lagomasino, Isabel T.
- Article
41
- Touro Law Review, 2021, v. 37, n. 2, p. 1027
- Article
42
- Touro Law Review, 2021, v. 37, n. 1, p. 105
- Article
43
- American University Law Review, 2011, v. 61, n. 1, p. 165
- Article
45
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2020, v. 43, n. 1, p. 85
- LARKIN, PAUL J.;
- CANAPARO, GIAN CARLO
- Article
46
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2013, v. 36, n. 1, p. 355
- Article
47
- Charleston Law Review, 2010, v. 4, n. 3, p. 661
- Article
49
- Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 2014, v. 30, n. 3, p. 558, doi. 10.1093/jleo/ewt006
- Boylan, Richard T.;
- Mocan, Naci
- Article