Works matching Criminal defense
1
- Derecho PUCP, 2023, n. 90, p. 79, doi. 10.18800/derechopucp.202301.003
- FARÍAS, JAVIERA;
- FERNÁNDEZ, JOSÉ MANUEL;
- PASCUAL, TOMÁS;
- ROJAS, HUGO
- Article
2
- Crime, Media, Culture, 2008, v. 4, n. 1, p. 31, doi. 10.1177/1741659007087273
- Article
3
- Law, Crime & History, 2012, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
4
- Journal of Social Psychology, 2021, v. 161, n. 5, p. 543, doi. 10.1080/00224545.2020.1845593
- Avery, Joseph J.;
- Starck, Jordan;
- Zhong, Yiqiao;
- Avery, Jonathan D.;
- Cooper, Joel
- Article
5
- European Journal on Criminal Policy & Research, 2016, v. 22, n. 2, p. 341, doi. 10.1007/s10610-015-9289-3
- Liang, Bin;
- Lu, Hong;
- He, Ni
- Article
6
- Revista Jurídica Cesumar: Mestrado, 2024, v. 24, n. 3, p. 782, doi. 10.17765/2176-9184.2024v24n3.e13355
- de Lara Araujo, Leonardo;
- Foletto Santin, Valter;
- Ribeiro Cardoso, Henrique
- Article
7
- Plymouth Law & Criminal Justice Review, 2013, v. 5, p. 50
- Article
8
- Crime, Law & Social Change, 2023, v. 79, n. 5, p. 555, doi. 10.1007/s10611-023-10081-2
- Rengifo, Andres F.;
- Avila, Lorena;
- Ibañez, David
- Article
9
- Psychology, Crime & Law, 2018, v. 24, n. 4, p. 414, doi. 10.1080/1068316X.2017.1390114
- Xiong, Moulin;
- Liu, Siyu;
- Liang, Bin
- Article
10
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2024, v. 42, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1002/bsl.2635
- Frierson, Richard L.;
- Joshi, Kaustubh G.
- Article
11
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2007, v. 25, n. 4, p. 573, doi. 10.1002/bsl.759
- Kramer, Greg M.;
- Wolbransky, Melinda;
- Heilbrun, Kirk
- Article
12
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2021, v. 45, n. 2, p. 159
- Article
13
- American Bar Association Journal, 1983, v. 69, n. 8, p. 1030
- Article
14
- Law & Society Review, 2011, v. 45, n. 4, p. 831, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00458.x
- Liu, Sida;
- Halliday, Terence C.
- Article
15
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2008, v. 75, n. 3, p. 1259
- Article
16
- German Law Journal, 2014, v. 15, n. 1, p. 43, doi. 10.1017/s2071832200002820
- Schemmel, Alexander;
- Corell, Christian;
- Richter, Natalie
- Article
17
- Advocate (05154987), 2021, v. 64, n. 2, p. 5
- Article
18
- Advocate (05154987), 2021, v. 64, n. 2, p. 18
- Article
19
- Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 1959, v. 50, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
20
- Legal Studies, 2020, v. 40, n. 2, p. 230, doi. 10.1017/lst.2019.31
- Article
21
- Journal of Crime & Justice, 2007, v. 30, n. 2, p. 79, doi. 10.1080/0735648X.2007.9721236
- Leto, Jessica L.;
- Pogrebin, Mark R.;
- Stretesky, Paul B.
- Article
22
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2005, v. 153, n. 5, p. 1709, doi. 10.2307/4150639
- Article
23
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 1986, v. 11, n. 1, p. 11, doi. 10.1007/BF02889818
- Article
24
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2022, v. 112, n. 2, p. 265
- GALOOB, STEPHEN R.;
- SHELEY, ERIN
- Article
25
- American Journal of Law & Medicine, 1991, v. 17, n. 1/2, p. 192
- Article
26
- Judges' Journal, 2012, v. 51, n. 2, p. 10
- Adler, Julian;
- Taylor, Brett
- Article
27
- McGill Law Journal, 2023, v. 68, n. 3, p. 291, doi. 10.26443/law.v68i3.1307
- Article
28
- Texas Law Review, 2002, v. 81, n. 2, p. 655
- Article
29
- Law of Ukraine / Pravo Ukrainy, 2014, n. 10, p. 124
- Article
30
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2018, v. 45, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
32
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2023, v. 117, n. 5, p. 1351
- Roth, Jessica A.;
- Vaynman, Anna D.;
- Penrod, Steven D.
- Article
33
- International Journal of the Legal Profession, 2012, v. 19, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1080/09695958.2012.758039
- Article
34
- Arizona Law Review, 2013, v. 55, n. 3, p. 805
- Article
35
- Journal of Law & Society, 2007, v. 34, n. 4, p. 489, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2007.00402.x
- Article
36
- Manitoba Law Journal, 2013, v. 37, n. 1, p. 181, doi. 10.29173/mlj867
- Article
37
- UCLA Journal of International Law & Foreign Affairs, 2009, v. 14, n. 1, p. 169
- Article
38
- Vniversitas, 2013, n. 126, p. 165
- Prieto Sanjuán, Rafael A.
- Article
39
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2013, v. 70, n. 2, p. 1363
- Article
40
- Denver University Law Review, 2015, v. 92, n. 4, p. 835
- Article
41
- UCLA Law Review, 2011, v. 58, n. 6, p. 1515
- Article
43
- Stanford Law Review, 2011, v. 63, n. 4, p. 813
- Article
44
- Columbia Law Review, 2004, v. 104, n. 3, p. 801, doi. 10.2307/4099331
- Article
45
- LESIJ - Lex ET Scientia International Journal, 2020, v. 27, n. 2, p. 174
- Article
46
- Advocate (05154987), 2025, v. 68, n. 5, p. 34
- Article
47
- Georgia State University Law Review, 2021, v. 37, n. 2, p. 305
- Article
48
- New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement, 2015, v. 41, n. 1, p. 29
- Article
49
- Child Welfare, 1991, v. 70, n. 5, p. 541
- Article
50
- Criminal Law & Philosophy, 2016, v. 10, n. 4, p. 657, doi. 10.1007/s11572-014-9337-y
- Article