Works matching Criminal defendants
1
- Psychology, Crime & Law, 2015, v. 21, n. 2, p. 186, doi. 10.1080/1068316X.2014.951646
- Raaijmakers, E.;
- de Keijser, J.W.;
- Nieuwbeerta, P.;
- Dirkzwager, A.J.E.
- Article
2
- Library of Progress-Library Science, Information Technology & Computer, 2024, v. 44, n. 3, p. 18420
- Lutfiu, Nuredin;
- Agushi, Arben;
- Halabaku, Agon
- Article
3
- Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2006, v. 24, n. 5, p. 633, doi. 10.1002/bsl.661
- Kucharski, L. Thomas;
- Duncan, Scott;
- Egan, Shannon S.;
- Falkenbach, Diana M.
- Article
4
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 3, p. 691
- Article
5
- Missouri Law Review, 2019, v. 84, n. 2, p. 323
- Article
6
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2018, v. 2018, n. 6, p. 1193
- Article
7
- Michigan Law Review, 2024, v. 123, n. 1, p. 51, doi. 10.36644/mlr.123.1.reimagining
- Article
9
- California Law Review, 2018, v. 106, n. 4, p. 1379, doi. 10.15779/Z38N58CM0D
- Article
10
- San Diego Law Review, 2009, v. 46, n. 1, p. 161
- Article
11
- Iowa Law Review, 2013, v. 98, n. 3, p. 1275
- Article
12
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2008, v. 5, n. 3, p. 477, doi. 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2008.00131.x
- Article
13
- Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 2017, v. 22, n. 4, p. 307, doi. 10.24839/2325-7342.JN22.4.307
- Crawley, Donna;
- Ramos, Casey;
- Leyva, Janelle
- Article
14
- Australian Journal of Asian Law, 2020, v. 21, n. 1, p. 55
- Article
15
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2024, v. 57, n. 2, p. 333
- Article
16
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2011, v. 44, n. 4, p. 1399
- Article
17
- Akron Law Review, 2017, v. 50, n. 2, p. 269
- Article
18
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2017, v. 74, n. 3, p. 1743
- Article
19
- Psychology, Crime & Law, 2021, v. 27, n. 3, p. 282, doi. 10.1080/1068316X.2020.1798428
- Rerick, Peter O.;
- Livingston, Tyler N.;
- Miller, Monica K.
- Article
20
- North Dakota Law Review, 2013, v. 89, n. 4, p. 709
- Article
21
- Social Forces, 2021, v. 100, n. 1, p. 194, doi. 10.1093/sf/soaa082
- Article
22
- Yale Law Journal, 2022, v. 131, n. 5, p. 1584
- Article
23
- Duke Law Journal, 2018, v. 67, n. 6, p. 1219
- Article
24
- Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2023, v. 38, n. 4, p. 513, doi. 10.1093/arclin/acac073
- Finley, John-Christopher A;
- Brook, Michael;
- Kern, Daniel M;
- Reilly, James L;
- Hanlon, Robert E
- Article
25
- Wyoming Law Review, 2013, v. 13, n. 1, p. 263, doi. 10.59643/1942-9916.1297
- Article
26
- Columbia Law Review, 2018, v. 118, n. 3, p. 769
- Capra, Daniel J.;
- Richter, Liesa L.
- Article
27
- Southern California Law Review, 2017, v. 90, n. 6, p. 1299
- Article
28
- Social Behavior & Personality: an international journal, 1998, v. 26, n. 1, p. 23, doi. 10.2224/sbp.1998.26.1.23
- JOINER, JR., THOMAS E.;
- BROWN, DAVID LANE;
- FELTHOUS, ALAN R.;
- BARRATT, ERNEST P.;
- BROWN, LAURIE A.
- Article
29
- International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2006, v. 5, n. 2, p. 195, doi. 10.1080/14999013.2006.10471243
- Kucharski, L. Thomas;
- Falkenbach, Diana M.;
- Egan, Shannon S.;
- Duncan, Scott
- Article
30
- Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores, 2021, v. 8, n. 3, p. 1
- Benavides Benalcázar, Merck;
- Crespo-Berti., Luis A.;
- Solá Íniguez, Miguel
- Article
31
- UMKC Law Review, 2011, v. 79, n. 4, p. 925
- Article
32
- Monash University Law Review, 2019, v. 45, n. 1, p. 141
- Article
33
- South Carolina Law Review, 2011, v. 62, n. 4, p. 671
- Article
34
- Stanford Law Review, 2010, v. 62, n. 4, p. 1119
- Brown, Teneille;
- Murphy, Emily
- Article
35
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2014, v. 28, n. 2, p. 525
- GALLO, JOHN N.;
- GREENFIELD, DANIEL M.
- Article
36
- Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 2017, v. 51, n. 1, p. 39
- Article
37
- Hamline Law Review, 2015, v. 38, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
38
- Hamline Law Review, 2014, v. 37, n. 2, p. 453
- Article
39
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2019, v. 72, n. 2, p. 519
- Article
40
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2012, v. 44, n. 4, p. 1575
- Article
41
- Creighton Law Review, 2024, v. 57, n. 2, p. 391
- Article
42
- Marquette Law Review, 2012, v. 96, n. 2, p. 591
- Article
43
- Arizona Law Review, 2012, v. 54, n. 4, p. 1073
- Article
44
- Tennessee Law Review, 2012, v. 79, n. 3, p. 669
- Article
45
- Akron Law Review, 2017, v. 50, n. 2, p. 175
- Article
46
- Psychology, Crime & Law, 2022, v. 28, n. 9, p. 883, doi. 10.1080/1068316X.2021.1972107
- Frazier, Annabelle;
- Gonzales, Joseph E.
- Article
47
- Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2014, v. 59, n. 4, p. 1008, doi. 10.1111/1556-4029.12429
- Lee, Eugene;
- Rosner, Richard;
- Harmon, Ronnie
- Article
48
- Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2007, v. 52, n. 6, p. 1372, doi. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00571.x
- Poortinga, Ernest;
- Lemmen, Craig;
- Majeske, Karl
- Article
49
- Frontiers in Immunology, 2017, v. 8, p. 1, doi. 10.3389/fgene.2017.00033
- Taylor, Duncan A.;
- Bright, Jo-Anne;
- Buckleton, John
- Article
50
- Frontiers in Genetics, 2017, v. 8, p. 1, doi. 10.3389/fgene.2017.00033
- Taylor, Duncan A.;
- Bright, Jo-Anne;
- Buckleton, John
- Article