Works matching Copyright cases
1
- Modern Law Review, 2018, v. 81, n. 2, p. 282, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12329
- Kalimo, Harri;
- Meyer, Trisha;
- Mylly, Tuomas
- Article
2
- Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 2011, v. 15, n. 1, p. 257
- Article
3
- Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, 2022, v. 43, n. 1, p. 37
- Article
4
- Boston University Law Review, 2024, v. 104, n. 3, p. 965
- Article
5
- Florida Bar Journal, 2010, v. 84, n. 2, p. 26
- Wolfe, Richard C.;
- Elton, Serona
- Article
6
- ITNOW, 2006, v. 48, n. 1, p. 34, doi. 10.1093/itnow/bwi150
- Article
7
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2020, v. 43, n. 3, p. 343
- Article
8
- Pace Law Review, 2015, v. 35, n. 3, p. 1016, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.1900
- Article
9
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2012, v. 20, n. 1, p. 75
- Article
11
- William & Mary Law Review, 2022, v. 63, n. 3, p. 773
- Article
12
- William & Mary Law Review, 1997, v. 39, n. 1, p. 65
- Article
13
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2020, v. 35, n. 3, p. 663, doi. 10.15779/Z38ST7DX70
- Baganesh, Shyamkrishna;
- Menell, Peter S.
- Article
14
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2015, v. 10, n. 6, p. 406, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpv060
- Bercimuelle-Chamot, Kevin
- Article
15
- Journal of Law & Education, 2014, v. 43, n. 4, p. 581
- Article
16
- Library Trends, 2022, v. 71, n. 1, p. 66, doi. 10.1353/lib.2023.0005
- Article
17
- Publishing Research Quarterly, 2017, v. 33, n. 3, p. 238, doi. 10.1007/s12109-017-9522-7
- Article
18
- Jurisprudence (1802-3843), 2020, n. 1, p. 15
- Article
19
- Law of Ukraine / Pravo Ukraini, 2025, n. 2, p. 102, doi. 10.33498/louu-2025-02-102
- Article
20
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2015, v. 109, n. 2, p. 343
- Walker, Robert Kirk;
- Depoorter, Ben
- Article
21
- Deakin Law Review, 2012, v. 17, n. 2, p. 385
- Article
22
- Jurisprudence / Jurisprudencija, 2008, v. 2, n. 104, p. 84
- Article
23
- Temple Law Review, 2025, v. 97, n. 3, p. 459
- Article
25
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2016, v. 40, n. 2, p. 237
- Article
26
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2016, v. 39, n. 3, p. 463
- Article
27
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2016, v. 40, n. 2, p. 275
- Article
28
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2016, v. 39, n. 3, p. 441
- Article
29
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2016, v. 40, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
30
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2016, v. 39, n. 4, p. 513
- Article
31
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2016, v. 39, n. 3, p. 437
- Article
36
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2015, v. 38, n. 4, p. 577
- Article
37
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2014, v. 37, n. 4, p. 557
- Article
38
- International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 1999, v. 13, n. 1, p. 81, doi. 10.1080/13600869955279
- Article
39
- International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 1998, v. 12, n. 1, p. 163, doi. 10.1080/13600869855612
- Article
40
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2011, v. 79, n. 6, p. 1746
- Article
41
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2011, v. 79, n. 6, p. 1644
- Article
42
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 2, p. 473
- Dogan, Stacey L.;
- Lemley, Mark A.
- Article
43
- Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, 2013, v. 16, p. 301
- Article
44
- Touro Law Review, 2019, v. 35, n. 4, p. 1291
- Article
45
- ARSC Journal, 2009, v. 40, n. 2, p. 225
- Article
46
- i-Manager's Journal on Economics & Commerce, 2024, v. 4, n. 2, p. 1, doi. 10.26634/jecom.4.2.21029
- KAMPANDIRA, RACHEAL;
- LAXMIKANTHAN, MUTHUVEL
- Article
47
- Journal of the Australian Library & Information Association, 2019, v. 68, n. 2, p. 146, doi. 10.1080/24750158.2019.1608496
- Pryor-Darnell, Teghan Alexis;
- Andersen, Nikki;
- Rowling, Samara
- Article
48
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2020, v. 28, n. 2, p. 183
- Article
49
- Texas Review of Entertainment & Sports Law, 2003, v. 5, n. 1, p. 195
- Article
50
- Strategic Finance, 2001, v. 82, n. 8, p. 52
- Article