THE SUPREME COURT'S FRAGILE COPYRIGHT LAW.
- Published in:
- Florida State University Law Review, 2023, v. 50, n. 2, p. 235
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching Copyright and the Supreme Court
Results: 286
1
2
Copyright Law Declared by the Supreme Court of India.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2023, v. 28, n. 2, p. 151, doi. 10.56042/jipr.v28i2.556
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Theoretical Underpinnings of Copyright and Design Laws Post-Krishika Lulla and Godrej Sara Lee: Decisions of the Supreme Court of India.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2022, v. 27, n. 6, p. 434, doi. 10.56042/jipr.v27i6.66025
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Theoretical Underpinnings of Copyright and Design Laws: Decisions of the Supreme Court of India.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2021, v. 26, n. 4, p. 220, doi. 10.56042/jipr.v26i4.47010
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Application of YouTube/Cyando by Dutch Supreme Court: Usenet operator not liable for copyright infringement.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2023, v. 18, n. 4, p. 271, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpad027
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
A RIFF ON THE SUPREME COURT'S COPYRIGHT CASES COMPARED TO ITS PATENT CASES.
- Published in:
- Boston University Law Review, 2024, v. 104, n. 3, p. 965
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
The Blackmun Papers: A Peek Behind the Scenes of a Quarter Century of Supreme Court Copyright Jurisprudence.
- Published in:
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2005, v. 28, n. 3, p. 315
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Mickey Mouse Still Belongs to Disney: The Supreme Court Upholds Copyright Extension.
- Published in:
- Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2004, v. 32, n. 2, p. 212, doi. 10.1177/0092070303262522
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
Why and How the Issue of Copyright Registration Made Its Way up to the Supreme Court.
- Published in:
- Touro Law Review, 2018, v. 34, n. 4, p. 1319
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
We Need An Answer! Hearst Newspapers Calls Out the Supreme Court For Not Choosing A Copyrights Accrual Rule.
- Published in:
- Penn State Law Review, 2024, v. 129, n. 1, p. 241
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
COPYRIGHT IMPLICATIONS OF IMPORTING AND RESELLING FOREIGN EDITION TEXTBOOKS IN THE UNITED STATES: SUPREME COURT UPDATE ON FIVE LITTLE WORDS IN THE FIRST SALE DOCTRINE.
- Published in:
- Business Law Review (15337421), 2014, v. 47, p. 19
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Italian Supreme Court provides guidance on parody exception under copyright and trade mark law.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2023, v. 18, n. 3, p. 177, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpad017
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Five decisions in one day: the Supreme Court of Canada takes on copyright law.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 1, p. 59, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jps187
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
THREATENING THE FOUNDING IDEAL OF A REPUBLIC OF LETTERS: AN ASSESSMENT OF THE SUPREME COURT'S COPYRIGHT DECISIONS OVER THE FIRST DECADE OF THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY.
- Published in:
- Akron Intellectual Property Journal, 2011, v. 5, n. 2, p. 205
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Der urheberrechtliche Schutz von Programmierschnittstellen unter Berücksichtigung der Entscheidung des U.S. Supreme Court in der Sache Oracle v. Google.
- Published in:
- Computer und Recht, 2023, v. 39, n. 10, p. 687, doi. 10.9785/cr-2023-391016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
UP IN THE AEREO: DID THE SUPREME COURT JUST ELIMINATE THE VOLITIONAL CONDUCT REQUIREMENT FOR DIRECT COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT?
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2015, v. 46, n. 1, p. 243
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Recent developments in copyright law: Selected US Supreme Court, Court Of Appeals, and District Court opinions between 1 February 2005 and 1 May 2006.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2007, v. 12, n. 3, p. 365
- Publication type:
- Article
18
THE 2012 SUPREME COURT COPYRIGHT DECISIONS & TECHNOLOGICAL NEUTRALITY.
- Published in:
- University of British Columbia Law Review, 2013, v. 46, n. 2, p. 589
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
CLEAR SKIES AHEAD: WHY THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION IN AEREO SHOULD HAVE LIMITED COPYRIGHT IMPLICATIONS ON CLOUD TECHNOLOGY.
- Published in:
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 4, p. 891
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
WHY THE SUPREME COURT REJECTED THE PROSPECT THEORY OF COPYRIGHT SCOPE.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2024, v. 42, n. 3, p. 683
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
ALL FOR COPYRIGHT STAND UP AND HOLLER! THREE CHEERS FOR STAR ATHLETICA AND THE U.S. SUPREME COURT'S PERCEIVED AND IMAGINED SEPARATELY TEST.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2018, v. 36, n. 1, p. 149
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Türkiye'de Telif Hakları İhlalleri: Yargıtay Kararları Çerçevesinde Bir Değerlendirme.
- Published in:
- Information World / Bilgi Dünyası, 2014, v. 15, n. 1, p. 55
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
Copyright Legal Protection on Ownership of the Song “Majulah, Jayalah STA” (Study of the Supreme Court Decision No. 279 K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2020).
- Published in:
- EAI Computing & Communication in Emerging Regions - CCER, 2022, p. 1, doi. 10.4108/eai.4-11-2022.2329362
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
US Supreme Court holds that copyright law's discovery rule does not impose a 3-year limit on infringement damages.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2024, v. 19, n. 11, p. 802, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpae068
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
Bullfighting denied copyright protection by Spanish Supreme Court.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2021, v. 16, n. 3, p. 198, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpab066
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
Danish Supreme Court denies copyright in rubber boots.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2020, v. 15, n. 9, p. 679, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa127
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
US Supreme Court holds that US states are immune from federal copyright infringement claims in case involving Blackbeard's flagship.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2020, v. 15, n. 6, p. 414, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa078
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
Supreme Court of Lithuania rules that draft GDPR documentation is subject to copyright protection and does not fall within the exclusion from protection concerning legal acts.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2020, v. 15, n. 6, p. 413, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa074
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
How the Nigerian Supreme Court finally resolved the copyright collective management organizations' locus standi conundrum.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2019, v. 14, n. 6, p. 472, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpz013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
Italian Supreme Court confirms eligibility of TV formats for copyright protection.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2017, v. 12, n. 12, p. 968, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpx197
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
US Supreme Court clarifies attorney's fees standard under section 505 of the Copyright Act.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2016, v. 11, n. 10, p. 737, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpw125
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
Supreme Court of Canada releases ‘copyright pentalogy’.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2012, v. 7, n. 12, p. 846, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jps146
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
PARODIES, PHOTOCOPIES, RECUSALS, AND ALTERNATE COPYRIGHT HISTORIES: THE TWO DEADLOCKED SUPREME COURT FAIR USE CASES.
- Published in:
- Syracuse Law Review, 2018, v. 68, n. 1, p. 7
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
A NEW HOPE FOR COPYRIGHT: THE U.K. SUPREME COURT RULING IN LUCASFILM LTD. V. AINSWORTH AND WHY CONGRESS SHOULD FOLLOW SUIT.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2012, v. 20, n. 1, p. 87
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
Copyrights "Restored": The Supreme Court Yanks Millions of Copyrights out of the Public Domain in GOLAN v. HOLDER.
- Published in:
- Roger Williams University Law Review, 2013, v. 18, n. 1, p. 10
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
GOOGLE, INC. V. ORACLE AMERICA, INC.: SUPREME COURT DECLINES TO REVIEW REVERSAL OF LANDMARK API COPYRIGHT DECISION.
- Published in:
- Loyola Law Review, 2016, v. 62, n. 1, p. 189
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
Supreme Court backs copyright owners.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2005, v. 10, n. 6, p. 525
- Publication type:
- Article
38
RETHINKING COPYRIGHT'S RELATIONSHIP TO THE FIRST AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- Boston University Law Review, 2020, v. 100, n. 4, p. 1215
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
A TALE OF TWO GINSBURGS: TRADITIONAL CONTOURS IN ELDRED AND GOLAN.
- Published in:
- DePaul Law Review, 2013, v. 62, n. 4, p. 931
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
DON'T YOU WANT TO WATCH TELEVISION PROGRAMS AIRED IN YOUR COUNTRY WHILE YOU ARE ABROAD?: BROADCASTING, REPRODUCTION, PUBLIC TRANSMISSION AND COPYRIGHT.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, 2015, v. 2015, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
The Institutional Progress Clause.
- Published in:
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2014, v. 16, n. 3, p. 533
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
Unwinding Sony.
- Published in:
- California Law Review, 2007, v. 95, n. 4, p. 941
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
Trademark Law Declared by the Supreme Court of India in Twentieth-Century.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2023, v. 28, n. 4, p. 334, doi. 10.56042/jipr.v28i4.759
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
Secondary Liability for Copyright Infringement: BitTorrent as a Vehicle for Establishing a New Copyright Definition for Staple Articles of Commerce.
- Published in:
- Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 2006, v. 40, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
German Federal Supreme Court expands design protection: ‘Birthday Train’.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2014, v. 9, n. 7, p. 549, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpu079
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSING VIEWPOINTS: WHY POLAR OPPOSITES SHOULD NOT ATTRACT THE PARODY LABEL UNDER THE FAIR USE EXCEPTION TO COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2013, v. 21, n. 1, p. 105
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
THE REVOLUTION WAS NOT TELEVISED: EXAMINING COPYRIGHT DOCTRINE AFTER AEREO.
- Published in:
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2015, v. 30, p. 899
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT IN A BORDERLESS WORLD -- DOES TERRITORIALITY MATTER?
- Published in:
- International Journal of Law & Information Technology, 2007, v. 15, n. 1, p. 38, doi. 10.1093/ijlit/eal030
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
IT’S NOT FAIR: SOLVING THE EMBEDDED COPYRIGHT STALEMATE.
- Published in:
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2023, v. 2023, n. 1, p. 309
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
Reconsidering the Criminalization of Copyright Violation in India: Evaluating the Cognizable and Non-Bailable Regime.
- Published in:
- Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2025, v. 30, n. 2, p. 197, doi. 10.56042/jipr.v30i2.4311
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article