Works matching Confrontation of witnesses
1
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2019, v. 46, n. 1, p. 157
- Article
2
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2020, v. 22, n. 3, p. 547
- Article
3
- Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 2010, v. 32, n. 1, p. 8, doi. 10.1080/01973530903539754
- Rasinski, HeatherM.;
- Czopp, AlexanderM.
- Article
4
- Rutgers Law Journal, 2010, v. 41, n. 4, p. 967
- Article
6
- Virginia Law Review, 2011, v. 97, n. 1, p. 199
- Article
7
- Washington University Law Review, 2015, v. 92, n. 3, p. 793
- Article
8
- American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 2009, v. 33, n. 2, p. 431
- Article
9
- Hamline Law Review, 2011, v. 34, n. 1, p. 51
- Article
10
- Social Sciences in China, 2010, v. 31, n. 4, p. 36, doi. 10.1080/02529203.2010.524373
- Article
11
- Journal of Law, Technology & the Internet, 2024, v. 15, n. 2, p. 416
- Article
12
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 2012, v. 45, n. 5, p. 1283
- Article
13
- Utrecht Law Review, 2013, v. 9, n. 4, p. 127, doi. 10.18352/ulr.246
- Article
15
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2012, v. 102, n. 4, p. 1181
- LYON, THOMAS D.;
- DENTE, JULIA A.
- Article
16
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2020, v. 77, n. 9, p. 15
- MANKEY, MATTHEW;
- BETTISON, STACY L.
- Article
17
- St. Mary's Law Journal, 2015, v. 46, n. 2, p. 137
- Article
18
- UMKC Law Review, 2022, v. 91, n. 1, p. 217
- Article
19
- Texas Law Review, 2009, v. 87, n. 5, p. 857
- Article
20
- Charleston Law Review, 2023, v. 18, n. 2, p. 307
- Article
21
- Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 1968, v. 59, n. 3, p. 410
- Article
22
- Tax Lawyer, 2010, v. 64, n. 1, p. 125
- Article
23
- Columbia Law Review, 2021, v. 121, n. 2, p. 451
- Article
24
- Social Forces, 1980, v. 58, n. 3, p. 833, doi. 10.2307/2577187
- Article
26
- Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 2023, v. 32, n. 2, p. 491
- Article
27
- SMU Law Review, 2024, v. 77, n. 2, p. 399, doi. 10.25172/smulr.77.2.7
- Article
28
- South Dakota Law Review, 2011, v. 56, n. 2, p. 316
- Article
29
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2016, v. 20, n. 2, p. 103, doi. 10.1177/1365712716631761
- Article
30
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2004, v. 8, n. 4, p. 240, doi. 10.1350/ijep.8.4.240.60203
- Article
31
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2004, v. 8, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1350/ijep.8.1.1.36509
- Article
32
- L'Ospite Ingrato, 2024, v. 15, n. 1, p. 151, doi. 10.36253/oi-16364
- Article
33
- Carnets: Revue Electronique d'Etudes Françaises / Revista Electrónica de Estudos Franceses, 2018, n. 12, p. 1, doi. 10.4000/carnets.2401
- Article
34
- Texas Law Review, 2024, v. 102, n. 5, p. 1011
- Article
35
- South Carolina Law Review, 2013, v. 64, n. 4, p. 1117
- Article
36
- Maryland Law Review, 2010, v. 69, n. 2, p. 390
- Article
37
- Behaviour & Information Technology, 2004, v. 23, n. 2, p. 83, doi. 10.1080/01449290310001659231
- Lee, Eric;
- Whalen, Thom;
- Terris, Michael;
- McCarthy, Andrew
- Article
38
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 2019, v. 46, n. 2, p. 333
- Article
39
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2015, v. 17, n. 2, p. 463
- Article
40
- Seattle University Law Review, 2012, v. 35, n. 2, p. 473
- Article
41
- Boston College International & Comparative Law Review, 2009, v. 32, n. 2, p. 471
- Article
42
- Washington Law Review, 2022, v. 97, n. 1, p. 207
- Article
43
- Marquette Law Review, 2006, v. 89, n. 3, p. 625
- Article
44
- Universul Juridic, 2021, n. 6, p. 81
- OSTAVCIUC, Dinu;
- RUSNAC, Constantin
- Article
45
- Global Media Journal: Turkish Edition, 2012, v. 3, n. 5, p. 61
- ERKILIÇ, Senem DURUEL;
- ERKILIÇ, Hakan
- Article
46
- Media, War & Conflict, 2016, v. 9, n. 3, p. 306, doi. 10.1177/1750635216648051
- Article
48
- Roger Williams University Law Review, 2013, v. 18, n. 2, p. 353
- Article
49
- Iowa Law Review, 2023, v. 108, n. 3, p. 1369
- Article
50
- Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 2020, v. 34, n. 1, p. 307
- Article