Works matching Concept of Law, The (Book : Hart)
1
- Revista de Derecho UNED, 2016, n. 19, p. 917, doi. 10.5944/rduned.19.2016.18472
- Puig Hernández, Marc-Abraham
- Article
2
- San Diego Law Review, 2014, v. 51, n. 4, p. 921
- Article
3
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2001, v. 21, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1093/ojls/21.1.1
- Article
4
- Texas Law Review, 2013, v. 91, n. 7, p. 1739
- Berman, Mitchell N.;
- Toh, Kevin
- Article
5
- Law & Philosophy, 1991, v. 10, n. 4, p. 349, doi. 10.1007/BF00127410
- Article
6
- Texas Law Review, 2006, v. 84, n. 4, p. 945
- Article
7
- Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 2014, v. 27, n. 1, p. 27, doi. 10.1017/S0841820900006214
- Article
8
- Virginia Law Review, 2015, v. 101, n. 5, p. 1203
- Article
9
- Virginia Law Review, 2015, v. 101, n. 4, p. 987
- Article
10
- Virginia Law Review, 2015, v. 101, n. 4, p. 903
- Article
11
- Virginia Law Review, 2015, v. 101, n. 4, p. 869
- Article
13
- Lex Naturalis, 2015, v. 1, p. 1
- Article
14
- Legal Theory, 2017, v. 23, n. 4, p. 258, doi. 10.1017/S1352325217000258
- Article
15
- Ratio Juris, 2016, v. 29, n. 1, p. 136, doi. 10.1111/raju.12117
- Article
16
- Ratio Juris, 2009, v. 22, n. 4, p. 532, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2009.00439.x
- Article
17
- Griffith Law Review, 2015, v. 24, n. 4, p. 571, doi. 10.1080/10383441.2015.1138922
- Sykes, Robbie;
- Tranter, Kieran
- Article
20
- Revus: Journal for Constitutional Theory & Philosophy of Law, 2019, v. 37, p. 17, doi. 10.4000/revus.4773
- Article
21
- Utrecht Law Review, 2011, v. 7, n. 1, p. 141, doi. 10.18352/ulr.166
- Article
23
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2017, v. 84, n. 1, p. 147
- Ginsburg, Tom;
- Stephanopoulos, Nicholas
- Article
24
- Law & Philosophy, 2023, v. 42, n. 3, p. 211, doi. 10.1007/s10982-022-09461-x
- Article
25
- Law & Philosophy, 2017, v. 36, n. 5, p. 469, doi. 10.1007/s10982-017-9304-6
- Article
26
- Law & Philosophy, 2014, v. 33, n. 6, p. 689, doi. 10.1007/s10982-013-9203-4
- Article
27
- Law & Philosophy, 2014, v. 33, n. 6, p. 795, doi. 10.1007/s10982-014-9217-6
- Article
28
- Law & Philosophy, 2008, v. 27, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1007/s10982-007-9010-x
- Article
29
- Law & Philosophy, 2006, v. 25, n. 5, p. 533, doi. 10.1007/s10982-006-0004-x
- Article
30
- University of Queensland Law Journal, 2016, v. 35, n. 1, p. 21
- Article
35
- Otago Law Review, 2005, v. 11, n. 1, p. 17
- Article
36
- European Journal of International Law, 2017, v. 28, n. 1, p. 251, doi. 10.1093/ejil/chx006
- Article
37
- European Journal of International Law, 2017, v. 28, n. 1, p. 233, doi. 10.1093/ejil/chx005
- Article
38
- European Journal of International Law, 2017, v. 28, n. 1, p. 203, doi. 10.1093/ejil/chx004
- Article
39
- University of Louisville Law Review, 2011, v. 50, n. 1, p. 87
- Article
40
- University of Toronto Law Journal, 2014, v. 64, n. 5, p. 736, doi. 10.3138/utlj.020614-02RA
- Article
41
- Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 2021, v. 34, n. 2, p. 283, doi. 10.1017/cjlj.2021.11
- Article
42
- Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 2017, v. 30, n. 1, p. 97, doi. 10.1017/cjlj.2017.5
- Article
44
- American Journal of Jurisprudence, 2015, v. 60, n. 1, p. 51, doi. 10.1093/ajj/auv005
- Article