Works matching Computer Fraud %26 Abuse Act, 1984
1
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law, 2014, v. 16, n. 2, p. 551
- Article
2
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2018, v. 86, n. 1, p. 315
- Article
3
- Southern Law Journal, 2016, v. 26, n. 2, p. 191
- USNICK, WILLIAM;
- USNICK, LEE
- Article
4
- Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, 2013, v. 16, p. 231
- Article
5
- Touro Law Review, 2015, v. 31, n. 4, p. 981
- Article
6
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2021, v. 78, n. 6, p. 35
- DUBIS, JOE;
- MARES, KATHERINE F. K.
- Article
7
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2019, v. 109, n. 2, p. 313
- GRAVES, JAMES T.;
- ACQUISTI, ALESSANDRO;
- ANDERSON, ROSS
- Article
9
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2018, v. 2018, n. 2, p. 847
- Article
10
- George Mason Law Review, 2019, v. 26, n. 3, p. 965
- Article
11
- Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2014, v. 38, n. 3, p. 469
- Article
12
- William & Mary Law Review, 2020, v. 62, n. 2, p. 571
- Article
13
- Creighton Law Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 3, p. 423
- Article
14
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2020, v. 87, n. 5, p. 1437
- Article
15
- New York University Law Review, 2018, v. 93, n. 5, p. 1311
- Article
16
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2020, v. 34, n. 2, p. 529
- Article
17
- University of La Verne Law Review, 2016, v. 37, n. 2, p. 369
- Article
18
- Real Property, Trust & Estate Law Journal, 2017, v. 52, n. 1, p. 51
- Article
19
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2013, v. 82, n. 1, p. 359
- Article
20
- Penn State Law Review, 2020, v. 124, n. 3, p. 743
- Article
21
- Cardozo Law Review, 2020, v. 42, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
22
- Canadian Law Library Review, 2019, v. 44, n. 4, p. 25
- Article
23
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2021, v. 36, n. 1, p. 469, doi. 10.15779/Z384B2X554
- Penney, Jonathon W.;
- Schneier, Bruce
- Article
24
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2019, v. 34, n. 3, p. 891, doi. 10.15779/Z38M32N99Q
- Evtimov, Ivan;
- O'Hair, David;
- Fernandes, Earlence;
- Calo, Ryan;
- Kohno, Tadayoshi
- Article
25
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2018, v. 33, n. 4, p. 1307, doi. 10.15779/Z38SQ8QH9J
- Article
26
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2017, v. 57, n. 4, p. 483
- Article
27
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2013, v. 53, n. 4, p. 447
- Article
28
- Cornell Law Review, 2015, v. 100, n. 5, p. 1191
- Article
29
- Marquette Law Review, 2015, v. 98, n. 4, p. 1841
- Article
30
- Journal of Law, Technology & the Internet, 2014, v. 6, n. 1, p. 67
- Article
31
- Journal of Science & Technology Law, 2018, v. 24, n. 2, p. 372
- Article
32
- Journal of Science & Technology Law, 2018, v. 24, n. 2, p. 416
- Article
33
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2019, v. 50, n. 4, p. 831
- Article
34
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2019, v. 50, n. 4, p. 663
- Article
35
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 3, p. 901
- Article
36
- Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, 2017, v. 37, n. 3, p. 305
- Article
37
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2016, v. 34, n. 1, p. 281
- Article
38
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2022, v. 87, n. 3, p. 1077
- Article
39
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2020, v. 85, n. 2, p. 421
- Article
40
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2017, v. 82, n. 4, p. 1849
- Article
41
- New England Law Review, 2015, v. 49, n. 2, p. 259
- Article
42
- New England Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 2, p. 421
- Article
43
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology, 2023, v. 29, n. 1, p. 89
- Article
44
- George Washington Law Review, 2016, v. 84, n. 6, p. 1703
- Article
45
- George Washington Law Review, 2016, v. 84, n. 6, p. 1644
- Article
46
- George Washington Law Review, 2016, v. 84, n. 6, p. 1616
- Article
47
- George Washington Law Review, 2016, v. 84, n. 6, p. 1591
- Article
48
- George Washington Law Review, 2016, v. 84, n. 6, p. 1568
- Article
49
- George Washington Law Review, 2016, v. 84, n. 6, p. 1544
- Article
50
- George Washington Law Review, 2016, v. 84, n. 6, p. 1523
- Article