Works matching Communications Act of 1934
1
- American Journalism, 1988, v. 5, n. 4, p. 204, doi. 10.1080/08821127.1988.10731171
- Article
3
- Florida Journal of International Law, 2017, v. 29, n. 3, p. 303
- Article
4
- Harvard Kennedy School Review, 2018, v. 18, p. 95
- Article
5
- Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 2014, v. 58, n. 4, p. 671, doi. 10.1080/08838151.2014.966356
- Article
8
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1957, v. 22, n. 4, p. 549, doi. 10.2307/1190365
- Article
9
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2016, v. 82, n. 1, p. 281
- Article
10
- UCLA Entertainment Law Review, 2011, v. 18, n. 1, p. 148
- Article
12
- New England Law Review, 2013, v. 48, n. 1, p. 7
- Article
13
- Review of Industrial Organization, 2014, v. 45, n. 3, p. 203, doi. 10.1007/s11151-014-9429-9
- Article
14
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2017, v. 41, n. 1, p. 125
- Article
15
- University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 2019, v. 80, n. 4, p. 905, doi. 10.5195/lawreview.2019.657
- Article
16
- Georgia State University Law Review, 2019, v. 35, n. 3, p. 605
- Article
17
- Indiana Law Journal, 2016, v. 91, p. 33
- Article
19
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2018, v. 20, n. 3, p. 655
- Article
20
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2017, v. 32, p. 591, doi. 10.15779/Z38J38KH5F
- Article
21
- Villanova Law Review, 2018, v. 63, n. 2, p. 269
- Article
22
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1957, v. 22, n. 4, p. 672, doi. 10.2307/1190372
- Article
23
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1957, v. 22, n. 4, p. 644, doi. 10.2307/1190370
- Article
24
- Willamette Law Review, 2017, v. 53, n. 2, p. 137
- BOSE, AYESHA;
- GILPIN, LEILANI;
- AGOSTI, JAMIN;
- QUINN DANG
- Article
25
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2018, v. 56, p. 199
- Article
26
- Boston College Law Review, 2019, v. 60, p. 1
- Article
27
- Maryland Law Review, 2015, v. 74, n. 4, p. 715
- Article
28
- Review of Industrial Organization, 2014, v. 45, n. 3, p. 201, doi. 10.1007/s11151-014-9440-1
- Article
29
- CounterPunch, 2024, p. 1
- Article
30
- Iowa Law Review, 2013, v. 99, n. 1, p. 363
- Article
31
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 2016, v. 42, n. 1, p. 425
- Article
32
- Journal of Current Issues in Media & Telecommunications, 2010, v. 2, n. 1, p. 15
- Figliola, Patricia Moloney
- Article
34
- International Journal of Public Administration, 1996, v. 19, n. 1, p. 51, doi. 10.1080/01900699608525084
- Article
35
- Critical Studies in Media Communication, 2014, v. 31, n. 3, p. 230, doi. 10.1080/15295036.2014.889320
- Article
36
- Communication Law & Policy, 2020, v. 25, n. 3, p. 378, doi. 10.1080/10811680.2020.1766894
- Article
37
- Communication Law & Policy, 1997, v. 2, n. 4, p. 363, doi. 10.1080/10811689709368631
- Article
38
- American Bar Association Journal, 1981, v. 67, n. 4, p. 409
- Article
39
- American Bar Association Journal, 1981, v. 67, n. 2, p. 152
- Article
40
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2022, v. 37, p. 527, doi. 10.15779/Z38GH9B99R
- Article
41
- Communication Theory (1050-3293), 2022, v. 32, n. 1, p. 142, doi. 10.1093/ct/qtab009
- Article
42
- Journal of Radio Studies, 2002, v. 9, n. 2, p. 227
- Article
43
- Journal of Current Issues in Media & Telecommunications, 2013, v. 5, n. 4, p. 289
- Article
45
- Journal of Current Issues in Media & Telecommunications, 2010, v. 2, n. 4, p. 299
- Article
46
- Journal of Current Issues in Media & Telecommunications, 2010, v. 2, n. 2/3, p. 119
- Article
47
- International Journal of Communication (19328036), 2016, v. 10, p. 5908
- FREELON, DEEN;
- BECKER, AMY B.;
- LANNON, BOB;
- PENDLETON, ANDREW
- Article
48
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2010, v. 51, n. 1, p. 17
- Article
50
- Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 1999, v. 2, n. 3, p. 481, doi. 10.1353/rap.2010.0134
- Article