Works matching Coke, Edward, Sir, 1552-1634
2
- Legal Studies, 2014, v. 34, n. 1, p. 123, doi. 10.1111/lest.12010
- Article
3
- History Today, 2011, v. 61, n. 2, p. 18
- Article
4
- Seventeenth Century, 2024, v. 39, n. 3, p. 329, doi. 10.1080/0268117X.2024.2313195
- Article
6
- Law & History Review, 2010, v. 28, n. 1, p. 39, doi. 10.1017/S0738248009990034
- Article
7
- Law & Literature, 2015, v. 27, n. 3, p. 313, doi. 10.1080/1535685X.2015.1024924
- Article
8
- Law & Literature, 2005, v. 17, n. 1, p. 69, doi. 10.1525/lal.2005.17.1.69
- Article
9
- Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2020, v. 28, n. 3, p. 443
- Article
11
- Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 2023, v. 54, n. 2, p. 613
- Article
12
- Historian (02651076), 2015, n. 125, p. 16
- Article
13
- Sixteenth Century Journal, 2012, v. 43, n. 1, p. 103, doi. 10.1086/scj23210757
- Article
14
- Indexer, 2018, v. 36, n. 1, p. 2, doi. 10.3828/indexer.2018.22
- Article
15
- Indexer, 2018, v. 36, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.3828/indexer.2018.21
- Article
16
- Law & History Review, 2022, v. 40, n. 3, p. 383, doi. 10.1017/S0738248022000189
- Article
17
- Political Studies, 1986, v. 34, n. 2, p. 249, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1986.tb01594.x
- Article
18
- SEL: Studies in English Literature (Johns Hopkins), 2018, v. 58, n. 1, p. 193, doi. 10.1353/sel.2018.0008
- Article
19
- Historical Journal, 2016, v. 59, n. 3, p. 669, doi. 10.1017/S0018246X15000308
- Article
20
- Historical Journal, 2004, v. 47, n. 4, p. 849, doi. 10.1017/S0018246X04004005
- Article
21
- Utah Bar Journal, 2015, v. 28, n. 1, p. 54
- Article
22
- Parergon, 2015, v. 32, n. 3, p. 123, doi. 10.1353/pgn.2015.0186
- Article
23
- Macquarie Law Journal, 2017, v. 17, p. 128
- Article
24
- Adelaide Law Review, 2011, v. 31, n. 2, p. 127
- Article
25
- Parliamentary History, 2018, v. 37, n. 2, p. 197, doi. 10.1111/1750-0206.12361
- Article
26
- Utrecht Law Review, 2014, v. 10, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.18352/ulr.252
- Article
27
- Emory Law Journal, 2009, v. 58, n. 3, p. 588
- Article
28
- Emory Law Journal, 2009, v. 58, n. 3, p. 585
- Article
31
- Plymouth Law & Criminal Justice Review, 2015, v. 7, p. i
- Article
32
- Glossator: Practice & Theory of the Commentary, 2018, v. 10, n. 1, p. 309
- Article
33
- Historical Research, 2013, v. 86, n. 234, p. 619, doi. 10.1111/1468-2281.12018
- Article
34
- Journal of Legal History, 2021, v. 42, n. 2, p. 171, doi. 10.1080/01440365.2021.1946184
- Article
36
- Journal of Legal History, 2015, v. 36, n. 2, p. 129, doi. 10.1080/01440365.2015.1007899
- Article
38
- Journal of Legal History, 2009, v. 30, n. 1, p. 53, doi. 10.1080/01440360902765449
- Article
39
- Quebec Studies, 2013, v. 55, p. 101, doi. 10.3828/qs.55.1.101
- Article
40
- North Carolina Law Review, 2016, v. 94, n. 5, p. 1545
- Article
41
- Legal Studies, 2016, v. 36, n. 1, p. 163, doi. 10.1111/lest.12112
- Article
42
- Comitatus: A Journal of Medieval & Renaissance Studies, 2009, v. 40, p. 231, doi. 10.1353/cjm.2009.0009
- Article
43
- Independent Review, 2002, v. 7, n. 1, p. 69
- Article
44
- Past & Present, 1999, v. 163, n. 1, p. 76, doi. 10.1093/past/163.1.76
- Article
45
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2013, v. 38, n. 3, p. 309, doi. 10.1353/sch.2013.0002
- Article
47
- Journal of Constitutional History / Giornale di Storia Costituzionale, 2017, n. 34, p. 19
- Article
48
- Journal of Constitutional History / Giornale di Storia Costituzionale, 2012, n. 23, p. 13
- Article
49
- Modern Intellectual History, 2019, v. 16, n. 2, p. 375, doi. 10.1017/S1479244317000580
- Article
50
- Social Semiotics, 2005, v. 15, n. 1, p. 43, doi. 10.1080/10350330500059122
- Article