Works matching Capital punishment laws
1
- Al-Azhaar Research Journal, 2022, v. 8, n. 1, p. 101, doi. 10.46896/alazhr.v8i01.353
- Article
2
- Albany Law Review, 2002, v. 65, n. 4, p. 1051
- Article
4
- Akron Law Review, 2021, v. 54, n. 2, p. 267
- Acker, James R.;
- Stull, Brian W.
- Article
5
- Akron Law Review, 2017, v. 50, n. 2, p. 203
- Article
6
- Southern California Law Review, 2014, v. 87, n. 3, p. 733
- STEIKER, CAROL S.;
- STEIKER, JORDAN M.
- Article
8
- International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 2019, v. 14, n. 2, p. 298, doi. 10.5281/zenodo.3723480
- Robinson, Matthew;
- Moody, Lauren
- Article
9
- Denver Law Review, 2017, v. 94, n. 2, p. 363
- SAM KAMIN;
- MARCEAU, JUSTIN
- Article
10
- Denver Law Review, 2017, v. 94, n. 2, p. 363
- KAMIN, SAM;
- MARCEAU, JUSTIN
- Article
11
- Manchester Journal of Transnational Islamic Law & Practice, 2023, v. 19, n. 2, p. 20
- Article
12
- Revista Batista Pioneira, 2019, v. 8, n. 2, p. 405
- Article
13
- Boston University International Law Journal, 2016, v. 34, n. 1, p. 149
- Article
14
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 2016, v. 49, n. 4, p. 853
- Article
15
- Law & Literature, 2013, v. 25, n. 3, p. 466, doi. 10.1525/lal.2013.25.3.466
- Article
16
- Law & Literature, 2003, v. 15, n. 2, p. 267, doi. 10.1525/lal.2003.15.2.267
- Article
19
- Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2016, v. 26, n. 1, p. 66
- Article
20
- Critical Criminology, 2022, v. 30, n. 4, p. 947, doi. 10.1007/s10612-022-09638-9
- Article
21
- St. Louis University Law Journal, 2018, v. 62, n. 4, p. 781
- Article
22
- Minnesota Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 2/3, p. 421
- Article
23
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2016, v. 73, n. 3, p. 1213
- Article
25
- Journal of Legal Education, 2014, v. 64, n. 1, p. 5
- Article
27
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2017, v. 70, n. 2, p. 409
- Article
28
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2017, v. 70, n. 2, p. 369
- Article
29
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2017, v. 70, n. 2, p. 227
- Article
30
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2011, v. 36, n. 2, p. 427
- Article
31
- Nature, 2014, v. 506, n. 7488, p. 284, doi. 10.1038/506284a
- Article
33
- Maryland Law Review, 2010, v. 70, n. 1, p. 272
- Article
34
- International Journal of Human Rights, 2010, v. 14, n. 4, p. 603, doi. 10.1080/13642980903109130
- Article
35
- International Journal of Human Rights, 2008, v. 12, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1080/13642980701725160
- Article
36
- Alternative Law Journal, 2014, v. 39, n. 2, p. 134, doi. 10.1177/1037969X1403900215
- Article
37
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 2, p. 427
- Article
38
- Emory Law Journal, 2012, v. 62, n. 2, p. 407
- Article
39
- Emory Law Journal, 2012, v. 62, n. 1, p. 121
- Article
40
- Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 2015, v. 15, n. 2, p. 277, doi. 10.1080/14729342.2016.1191766
- Article
41
- University of Chicago Legal Forum, 2020, v. 2020, p. 295
- Article
42
- UMKC Law Review, 2014, v. 82, n. 2, p. 407
- Article
43
- Albany Law Review, 2013, v. 76, n. 4, p. 2061
- Article
44
- Albany Law Review, 2013, v. 76, n. 1, p. 561
- Article
45
- Cornell Law Review, 2022, v. 107, n. 6, p. 1799
- Article
46
- South Carolina Law Review, 2012, v. 64, n. 2, p. 369
- Article
47
- South Carolina Law Review, 2011, v. 63, n. 2, p. 425
- Article
48
- Connecticut Law Review, 2012, v. 44, n. 5, p. 1675
- Article
49
- Connecticut Bar Journal, 2012, v. 86, n. 4, p. 329
- CASALE, ROBERT M.;
- KATZ, JOHANNA S.
- Article
50
- Social & Legal Studies, 2023, v. 32, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1177/09646639221094938
- Article