Works matching Brandeis, Louis Dembitz, 1856-1941
1
- Journal of Modern Jewish Studies, 2012, v. 11, n. 2, p. 207, doi. 10.1080/14725886.2012.684862
- Article
3
- Connecticut History, 2010, v. 49, n. 2, p. 212, doi. 10.2307/44370050
- Article
4
- Maryland Law Review, 2015, v. 75, n. 1, p. 312
- Article
5
- Emory Law Journal, 2013, v. 62, n. 6, p. 1459
- Article
6
- University of Chicago Legal Forum, 2013, p. 173
- Article
7
- DePaul Journal of Health Care Law, 2023, v. 24, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
9
- Journal of Medicine & Philosophy, 1996, v. 21, n. 2, p. 121, doi. 10.1093/jmp/21.2.121
- Article
10
- Business History Review, 2016, v. 90, n. 1, p. 31, doi. 10.1017/S0007680515001063
- Article
12
- Akron Law Review, 2019, v. 52, n. 2, p. 1
- Article
13
- American Bar Association Journal, 1980, v. 66, n. 6, p. 795
- Article
14
- Southern California Law Review, 2012, v. 85, n. 3, p. 605
- ORBACH, BARAK;
- REBLING, GRACE CAMPBELL
- Article
16
- Creighton Law Review, 2005, v. 38, n. 5, p. 1179
- Article
17
- Widener Law Journal, 2012, v. 21, n. 2, p. 423
- Article
18
- Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 2001, v. 31, n. 1, p. 37, doi. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004880
- Article
20
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 3, p. 325, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0005
- Article
21
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 1, p. 80, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0026
- Article
22
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2014, v. 39, n. 2, p. 201, doi. 10.1353/sch.2014.0013
- Article
23
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2014, v. 39, n. 2, p. v, doi. 10.1353/sch.2014.0010
- Article
25
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2003, v. 28, n. 2, p. 145, doi. 10.1111/1540-5818.00060
- Article
26
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2001, v. 26, n. 3, p. 257, doi. 10.1111/1059-4329.00028
- Article
27
- Ad Americam, 2016, v. 17, p. 211, doi. 10.12797/AdAmericam.17.2016.17.16
- Article
28
- Western Speech, 1971, v. 35, n. 3, p. 199, doi. 10.1080/10570317109373704
- Article
29
- Public Opinion Quarterly, 1938, v. 2, n. 4, p. 533, doi. 10.1086/265230
- Article
30
- Journal of Education, 1919, v. 90, n. 11, p. 301
- Article
31
- Journalism History, 2009, v. 35, n. 3, p. 162, doi. 10.1080/00947679.2009.12062798
- Article
32
- Journalism History, 1987, v. 14, n. 1, p. 18, doi. 10.1080/00947679.1987.12066639
- Article
33
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2021, v. 46, n. 3, p. 280, doi. 10.1111/jsch.12278
- Article
35
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2018, v. 43, n. 1, p. 5, doi. 10.1353/sch.2018.0019
- Article
37
- California Law Review, 2010, v. 98, n. 6, p. 1805
- Article
38
- Journal of the Legal Profession, 2010, v. 35, p. 1
- Article
40
- University of Louisville Law Review, 2010, v. 49, n. 2, p. 163
- Article
41
- Tulane European & Civil Law Forum, 2011, v. 26, n. 1, p. 67
- Article
42
- Touro Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 1, p. 131
- Article
43
- Touro Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 1, p. 5
- Article
44
- Touro Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 1, p. 131
- Article
45
- Touro Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 1, p. 211
- Article
46
- Touro Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 1, p. 91
- Article
47
- Touro Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 1, p. 159
- Article
48
- Touro Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 1, p. 259
- Article
49
- Touro Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 1, p. 51
- Article
50
- Touro Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 1, p. 1
- Article