Works matching Barth, Karl, 1886-1968
1
- Dialog Teologic, 2019, v. 22, n. 43, p. 31, doi. 10.53438/hhis3955
- Article
2
- Catholica, 2019, v. 73, n. 1, p. 19
- Article
3
- Hervormde Teologiese Studies, 2017, v. 73, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.4102/hts.v73i1.4592
- van Wyk, Gabriël M. J. (Gafie)
- Article
4
- Modernism: Annual Journal of Contemporary Religious Reformism (2499-6742), 2019, n. 1, p. 153
- Article
5
- Pharos Journal of Theology, 2023, v. 104, n. 2, p. 1, doi. 10.46222/pharosjot.104.232
- Article
6
- European Legacy, 2020, v. 25, n. 2, p. 167, doi. 10.1080/10848770.2019.1692598
- Article
7
- Modern Theology, 2019, v. 35, n. 2, p. 323, doi. 10.1111/moth.12469
- Article
8
- Religions, 2025, v. 16, n. 5, p. 594, doi. 10.3390/rel16050594
- Article
9
- Stimulus: The New Zealand Journal of Christian Thought & Practice, 2017, v. 24, n. 1, p. 33
- Article
11
- Stimulus: The New Zealand Journal of Christian Thought & Practice, 2013, v. 20, n. 2, p. 26
- Article
13
- International Journal of Christianity & Education, 2025, v. 29, n. 1, p. 7, doi. 10.1177/20569971241252087
- Article
14
- Journal of Media & Religion, 2006, v. 5, n. 3, p. 147, doi. 10.1207/s15328415jmr0503_2
- Article
19
- Toronto Journal of Theology, 2014, v. 30, n. 2, p. 211, doi. 10.3138/tjt.2493
- Article
20
- Toronto Journal of Theology, 2009, v. 25, p. 155, doi. 10.3138/tjt.25.suppl_1.155
- Article
22
- Lutheran Quarterly, 2020, v. 34, n. 3, p. 293, doi. 10.1353/lut.2020.0050
- Article
23
- Christian Studies Journal, 2010, n. 24, p. 33
- Article
25
- Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion (Indiana University Press), 2014, v. 30, n. 2, p. 23, doi. 10.2979/jfemistudreli.30.2.23
- Article
26
- Ecumenical Review, 2007, v. 59, n. 2/3, p. 177, doi. 10.1111/j.1758-6623.2007.tb00625.x
- Article
27
- Ecumenical Review, 2007, v. 59, n. 2/3, p. 173
- Article
28
- Ecumenical Review, 1980, v. 32, n. 2, p. 129, doi. 10.1111/j.1758-6623.1980.tb03263.x
- Article
30
- Ecumenical Review, 1969, v. 21, n. 3, p. 204, doi. 10.1111/j.1758-6623.1969.tb02270.x
- Article
31
- Ecumenical Review, 1969, v. 21, n. 1, p. 74, doi. 10.1111/j.1758-6623.1969.tb02252.x
- Article
32
- Anglican Theological Review, 2021, v. 103, n. 4, p. 402, doi. 10.1177/00033286211028793
- Article
33
- Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 2021, v. 64, n. 2, p. 327
- Article
36
- Colloquium: The Australian & New Zealand Theological Review, 2017, v. 49, n. 2, p. 36
- Article
39
- Colloquium: The Australian & New Zealand Theological Review, 2012, v. 44, n. 2, p. 194
- Article
40
- Colloquium: The Australian & New Zealand Theological Review, 2011, v. 43, n. 1, p. 3
- Article
41
- Colloquium: The Australian & New Zealand Theological Review, 2010, v. 42, n. 1, p. 3
- Article
42
- Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 2011, v. 46, n. 3, p. 733, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2011.01209.x
- Article
43
- Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 2011, v. 46, n. 2, p. 370, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2011.01186.x
- Article
44
- Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 2009, v. 44, n. 1, p. 115, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2009.00989.x
- Article
45
- Stimulus: The New Zealand Journal of Christian Thought & Practice, 2007, v. 15, n. 3, p. 33
- Article
46
- Documentatieblad voor de Nederlandse Kerkgeschiedenis na 1800, 2021, v. 44, n. 94, p. 25, doi. 10.5117/DNK2021.94.002.VANK
- Article
47
- Documentatieblad voor de Nederlandse Kerkgeschiedenis na 1800, 2020, v. 43, n. 93, p. 159, doi. 10.5117/DNK2020.93.004.HARI
- Article
49
- Interpretation: A Journal of Bible & Theology, 2016, v. 70, n. 1, p. 61, doi. 10.1177/0020964315603351
- Article