Works matching Antonin Scalia
1
- Perspectives on Political Science, 2019, v. 48, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1080/10457097.2018.1526002
- Article
2
- Human Life Review, 2016, v. 42, n. 2, p. 85
- Article
3
- International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2005, v. 3, n. 4, p. 519, doi. 10.1093/icon/moi032
- Article
5
- New York Law School Law Review, 2007, v. 51, n. 4, p. 907
- Article
6
- Perspectives on Political Science, 1999, v. 28, n. 1, p. 22, doi. 10.1080/10457099909600683
- Article
7
- Hofstra Law Review, 2017, v. 46, n. 2, p. 445
- Article
8
- Hofstra Law Review, 2017, v. 46, n. 2, p. 433
- Article
9
- North Dakota Law Review, 2016, v. 92, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
10
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2008, v. 75, n. 3, p. 997
- Article
11
- Education Next, 2017, v. 17, n. 4, p. 50
- Article
13
- Washington University Jurisprudence Review, 2021, v. 13, n. 2, p. 253
- Article
14
- Communication Law & Policy, 1997, v. 2, n. 3, p. 329, doi. 10.1080/10811689709368629
- Article
15
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2021, v. 56, n. 2, p. 321
- Article
16
- Yale Law Journal, 2017, v. 126, n. 6, p. 1600
- Article
17
- Perspectives on Political Science, 2019, v. 48, n. 1, p. 14, doi. 10.1080/10457097.2018.1513753
- Article
18
- Perspectives on Political Science, 2019, v. 48, n. 1, p. 7, doi. 10.1080/10457097.2018.1513752
- Article
21
- University of Memphis Law Review, 2014, v. 45, n. 2, p. 281
- LAMPARELLO, ADAM;
- MACLEAN, CHARLES E.
- Article
22
- 2017
- O’SCANNLAIN, JUDGE DIARMUID F.
- Speech
23
- Newspaper Research Journal, 1989, v. 10, n. 3, p. 61, doi. 10.1177/073953298901000307
- Hopkins, W. Wat;
- Yarbrough, Timothy L.
- Article
26
- Vermont Law Review, 2017, v. 41, n. 4, p. 689
- Article
27
- Právník, 2016, v. 155, n. 7, p. 639
- Article
29
- George Mason Law Review, 2025, v. 32, n. 1, p. 7
- Article
30
- George Washington Law Review, 2012, v. 80, n. 6, p. 1601
- Article
35
- Washington University Jurisprudence Review, 2017, v. 9, n. 2, p. 179
- Article
36
- Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal, 2017, v. 21, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
37
- George Washington Law Review Arguendo, 2012, v. 80, n. 6, p. 1601
- Article
38
- Intercultural Human Rights Law Review, 2019, v. 14, p. 67
- Article
39
- Journal of Public Law / Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht, 2013, v. 68, n. 1, p. 183, doi. 10.33196/zoer201301018301
- Article
40
- Logos: A Journal of Modern Society & Culture, 2024, v. 23, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
41
- Kritische Justiz, 2016, v. 49, n. 2, p. 253, doi. 10.5771/0023-4834-2016-2-253
- Article
42
- Lewis & Clark Law Review, 2009, v. 13, n. 2, p. 349
- Article
43
- Modern Age, 2016, v. 58, n. 2, p. 95
- Article
45
- 2013
- SCALIA, ANTONIN;
- ROBINSON, PETER
- Interview
46
- Inquiry, 2018, v. 61, n. 4, p. 422, doi. 10.1080/0020174X.2017.1371875
- Article
47
- Revista de Economía y Derecho, 2007, v. 4, n. 15, p. 7
- Article
48
- Human Life Review, 2016, v. 42, n. 2, p. 80
- Article
49
- 2015
- Scalia, Antonin;
- Breyer, Stephen G.
- Opinion
50
- George Washington Law Review, 2012, v. 80, n. 6, p. 1610
- Scalia, Antonin;
- Manning, John F.
- Article