Works matching Anthony M. Kennedy
2
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (Duke University Press), 2024, v. 36, n. 5, p. 251, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2024.36.5.251
- Article
3
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 3
- Parker, Elizabeth Rindskopf
- Article
4
- Albany Law Review, 2005, v. 69, n. 1, p. 237
- Article
5
- AWWA Water Science, 2022, v. 4, n. 2, p. 1, doi. 10.1002/aws2.1281
- Kearns, Joshua P.;
- Kennedy, Anthony M.;
- Shimabuku, Kyle K.
- Article
6
- Stanford Law Review, 2006, v. 58, n. 6, p. 1663
- Article
7
- Environmental Engineering Science, 2017, v. 34, n. 7, p. 496, doi. 10.1089/ees.2016.0525
- Kennedy, Anthony M.;
- Reinert, Allison M.;
- Knappe, Detlef R.U.;
- Summers, R. Scott
- Article
8
- Journal: American Water Works Association, 2018, v. 110, n. 4, p. E29, doi. 10.1002/awwa.1048
- Kennedy, Anthony M.;
- Korak, Julie A.;
- Flint, Leah C.;
- Hoffman, Catherine M.;
- Arias‐Paic, Miguel
- Article
9
- Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 2019, v. 49, n. 3, p. 490, doi. 10.1093/publius/pjz012
- Article
10
- California Law Review, 2014, v. 102, n. 4, p. 971
- Article
12
- Stanford Law Review, 2018, v. 71, p. 140
- Article
13
- Lewis & Clark Law Review, 2016, v. 20, n. 2, p. 381
- Article
14
- Education Next, 2018, v. 18, n. 3, p. 84
- Article
15
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 247
- Article
16
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 229
- Article
17
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 211
- Article
18
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 201
- Article
19
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 167
- Bhagwat, Ashutosh;
- Struhar, Matthew
- Article
20
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 103
- Article
21
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 77
- Article
22
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 61
- Article
23
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 31
- Article
24
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
25
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
26
- UMKC Law Review, 2013, v. 82, n. 1, p. 79
- Article
28
- University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2007, v. 18, n. 3, p. 383
- Article
29
- Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 2014, v. 65, n. 1, p. 11, doi. 10.1111/jfcj.12014
- Article
30
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1993, v. 56, n. 4, p. 121, doi. 10.2307/1192093
- Article
31
- White House Studies, 2018, v. 18, n. 2/3, p. 177
- Article
32
- White House Studies, 2018, v. 18, n. 2/3, p. 111
- Nolan, Andrew;
- Lewis, Kevin M.;
- Brannon, Valerie C.
- Article
33
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 2001, v. 56, n. 2, p. 5
- Article
34
- Labor Law Journal, 2018, v. 69, n. 3, p. 128
- Article
35
- Family Court Review, 2005, v. 43, n. 4, p. 544, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00053.x
- Article
36
- Gay & Lesbian Review Worldwide, 2003, v. 10, n. 6, p. 23
- Article
37
- Journal of the Missouri Bar, 2022, v. 78, n. 1, p. 29
- Article
38
- Teachers College Record, 2010, v. 112, n. 6, p. 1705, doi. 10.1177/016146811011200601
- ARMOR, DAVID J.;
- O'NEILL, STEPHANIE DUCK
- Article
39
- Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2015, v. 29, n. 1, p. 85
- Article
40
- Politeja, 2020, v. 17, n. 68, p. 215, doi. 10.12797/Politeja.17.2020.68.11
- Article
42
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2008, p. 23
- Article
43
- Cardozo Law Review, 2022, v. 43, n. 6, p. 2385
- Article
44
- Southern California Law Review, 2025, v. 98, n. 2, p. 255
- Article
45
- Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 1991, v. 21, n. 3, p. 93, doi. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a037960
- Thomas, John Clayton;
- Hoxworth, Dan H.
- Article
46
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2013, v. 37, n. 1, p. 229
- Article
47
- University of Queensland Law Journal, 2012, v. 31, n. 2, p. 203
- Article
48
- National Social Science Journal, 2011, v. 37, n. 1, p. 88
- Article
49
- White House Studies, 2018, v. 18, n. 1, p. 29
- Article
50
- Pace Law Review, 2023, v. 44, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.2081
- Article