A short-run welfare analysis of FTC antitrust oversight of patent litigation settlements under the Hatch-Waxman Act.Published in:Antitrust Bulletin, 2002, v. 47, n. 4, p. 661, doi. 10.1177/0003603X0204700406By:Higgins, Richard S.Publication type:Article
UNSETTLING DRUG PATENT SETTLEMENTS: A FRAMEWORK FOR PRESUMPTIVE ILLEGALITY.Published in:Michigan Law Review, 2009, v. 108, n. 1, p. 37By:Carrier, Michael A.Publication type:Article
EXAMINING THE § 271(E)(1) SAFE HARBOR OF THE HATCH-WAXMAN ACT: A LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL GRANTING MANDATORY POSTMARKETING EXCEPTIONS.Published in:Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2014, v. 32, n. 2, p. 651By:Chao, JessicaPublication type:Article
IF HATCH WINS, MAKE WAXMAN PAY: ONE-WAY FEE SHIFTING AS A SUBSTITUTE INCENTIVE TO RESOLVE ABUSE OF THE HATCH-WAXMAN ACT.Published in:Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, 2007, v. 2007, n. 1, p. 119By:McNair, John R.Publication type:Article
First Amendment Rights of Government Employees: A Primer for Public Officials.Published in:Public Administration Review, 1985, v. 45, n. 1, doi. 10.2307/3110153By:Haytord, Stephen L.Publication type:Article