Works matching Age Discrimination and the Supreme Court
1
- Review of Public Personnel Administration, 2009, v. 29, n. 1, p. 89, doi. 10.1177/0734371X08327091
- Article
2
- EurAmerica, 2011, v. 41, n. 3, p. 679
- Article
3
- Review of Public Personnel Administration, 2014, v. 34, n. 1, p. 23, doi. 10.1177/0734371X13506623
- Article
4
- Florida Bar Journal, 2010, v. 84, n. 2, p. 20
- Article
5
- Modern Law Review, 2015, v. 78, n. 2, p. 189, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12113
- Article
6
- St. John's Law Review, 2016, v. 90, n. 1, p. 109
- Article
7
- Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal, 2009, v. 44, n. 2, p. 385
- Article
8
- Illinois Public Employee Relations Report, 2008, v. 25, n. 2, p. 10
- Article
9
- Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 2010, v. 25, n. 4, p. 975
- Article
10
- Monthly Labor Review, 1996, v. 119, n. 7, p. 51
- Article
11
- Monthly Labor Review, 1995, v. 118, n. 10, p. 48
- Article
12
- Dispute Resolution Journal, 1997, v. 52, n. 3, p. 16
- Article
13
- Compensation & Benefits Review, 2005, v. 37, n. 2, p. 23, doi. 10.1177/0886368705274798
- Article
14
- Monthly Labor Review, 1978, v. 101, n. 4, p. 51
- Article
15
- ILR Review, 1987, v. 41, n. 1, p. 170, doi. 10.1177/001979398704100140
- Article
16
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1996, v. 47, n. 1, p. 117
- Article
17
- Review of Litigation, 2018, v. 38, n. 1, p. 95
- Article
18
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2016, v. 84, n. 3, p. 899
- Article
19
- Cardozo Law Review, 2017, v. 39, n. 2, p. 439
- Article
20
- Alabama Law Review, 2019, v. 70, n. 4, p. 1073
- Article
21
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2015, v. 72, n. 4, p. 34
- Article
22
- Review of European Administrative Law, 2017, v. 10, n. 1, p. 135, doi. 10.7590/187479817X14945955772000
- Article
23
- University of Louisville Law Review, 2013, v. 52, n. 2, p. 405
- Article
24
- Florida Bar Journal, 2000, v. 74, n. 9, p. 46
- Article
25
- Albany Law Review, 2009, v. 72, n. 1, p. 367
- Article
26
- Albany Law Review, 2006, v. 70, n. 1, p. 143
- Article
27
- TIP: The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 2013, v. 50, n. 4, p. 125
- Gutman, Art;
- Dunleavy, Eric
- Article
28
- Review of Public Personnel Administration, 2006, v. 26, n. 3, p. 269, doi. 10.1177/0734371X05285420
- Article
29
- CPA Journal, 1997, v. 67, n. 2, p. 10
- Article
30
- Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law, 2009, v. 30, n. 2, p. 571
- Article
31
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2014, v. 75, n. 6, p. 1027
- Article
32
- Journal of Risk & Insurance, 2004, v. 71, n. 2, p. 323, doi. 10.1111/j.0022-4367.2004.00092.x
- Article
33
- Maryland Law Review, 2014, v. 73, n. 3, p. 837
- Article
34
- Przeglad Sejmowy, 2023, v. 176, n. 3, p. 195, doi. 10.31268/PS.2023.193
- Article
35
- ABA Journal of Labor & Employment Law, 2016, v. 31, n. 3, p. v
- Article
36
- Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 2004, v. 11, n. 1, p. 109, doi. 10.2979/GLS.2004.11.1.109
- Article
37
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2017, v. 48, n. 3, p. 643
- Article
39
- Columbia Law Review, 2019, v. 119, n. 3, p. 763
- Article
40
- Studia BAS, 2011, v. 26, n. 2, p. 183
- Article
41
- Canadian Labour & Employment Law Journal, 2013, v. 17, n. 1, p. 31
- Article
42
- Advocate (05154987), 2014, v. 57, n. 2, p. 28
- Bennett, A. Dean;
- Randolph, Scott E.
- Article
44
- American Bar Association Journal, 1979, v. 65, n. 10, p. 1545
- Article
45
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 4, p. 529
- Article
46
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 1, p. 31
- Article
47
- Boston College Law Review, 2010, v. 51, n. 2, p. 279
- Article
48
- Benefits Quarterly, 2009, v. 25, n. 3, p. 57
- Article
49
- Emory Law Journal, 2020, v. 70, n. 2, p. 465
- Article
50
- Loyola Law Review, 2012, v. 58, n. 4, p. 795
- Article