Works matching Actions %26 defenses (Law)
1
- California Law Review, 1929, v. 17, n. 6, p. 591, doi. 10.2307/3475468
- Article
2
- Vniversitas, 2010, n. 121, p. 49
- Coral-Díaz, Ana Milena;
- Londoño-Toro, Beatriz;
- Muñoz-Ávila, Lina Marcela
- Article
4
- South Carolina Journal of International Law & Business, 2009, v. 5, p. 347
- Article
5
- Yale Law Journal, 2014, v. 123, n. 7, p. 2512
- Article
6
- Yale Law Journal, 2009, v. 118, n. 8, p. 1712
- Article
7
- Creighton Law Review, 2014, v. 47, n. 3, p. 501
- Article
8
- Tax Executive, 2006, v. 58, n. 2, p. 80
- Article
9
- Tax Executive, 2005, v. 57, n. 4, p. 370
- Article
10
- Tax Executive, 2000, v. 52, n. 5, p. 385
- Article
11
- Canadian Tax Journal / Revue Fiscale Canadienne, 2006, v. 54, n. 3, p. 677
- Article
13
- Canadian Tax Journal / Revue Fiscale Canadienne, 2003, v. 51, n. 5, p. 1982
- Article
14
- Canadian Tax Journal / Revue Fiscale Canadienne, 2003, v. 51, n. 3, p. 1291
- Thomas, Richard;
- Haney, Mary-Ann;
- Hong Ky Luu, Mary-Ann;
- Friedman, Michael F.;
- McDonnell, Thomas E.
- Article
15
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 3, p. 1088
- Article
17
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 1, p. 337
- Article
18
- Urban Lawyer, 2007, v. 39, n. 1, p. 164
- Article
19
- IIE Solutions, 2000, v. 32, n. 1, p. 10
- Article
20
- Columbia Law Review, 2022, v. 122, n. 5, p. 1423
- Article
21
- Arbitration Journal, 1986, v. 41, n. 2, p. 76
- Article
22
- Arbitration Journal, 1977, v. 32, n. 3, p. 224
- Article
23
- Arbitration Journal, 1975, v. 30, n. 3, p. 228
- Article
24
- Cardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2009, v. 17, n. 3, p. 545
- Article
25
- Emory Law Journal, 2016, v. 65, n. 6, p. 1657
- Article
26
- Syracuse Law Review, 2014, v. 64, n. 3, p. 469
- Keillor, Stan;
- Cohen, James H.;
- Changwesha, Mercy
- Article
27
- Syracuse Law Review, 2014, v. 64, n. 3, p. 409
- Article
30
- Southern California Law Review, 2014, v. 87, n. 3, p. 545
- Article
31
- Forensic Examiner, 2008, v. 17, n. 2, p. 48
- Article
32
- Deakin Law Review, 2005, v. 10, n. 1, p. 271, doi. 10.21153/dlr2005vol10no1art277
- Article
33
- Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 1987, v. 17, n. 3, p. 1
- Article
34
- Michigan Law Review, 1999, v. 97, n. 7, p. 2129, doi. 10.2307/1290183
- Bradley, Curtis A.;
- Goldsmith, Jack L.
- Article
35
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 2004, v. 67, n. 1/2, p. 75
- Sternlight, Jean R.;
- Jensen, Elizabeth J.
- Article
36
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 2003, v. 66, n. 4, p. 155
- Article
37
- Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 2006, v. 25, n. 2, p. 125
- Article
38
- Journal: American Water Works Association, 2006, v. 98, n. 10, p. 44, doi. 10.1002/j.1551-8833.2006.tb07772.x
- Article
39
- Journal of Education, 1911, v. 73, n. 3, p. 74
- Article
40
- Journal of Education, 1910, v. 71, n. 14, p. 366
- Article
41
- Journal of Education, 1909, v. 70, n. 2, p. 51
- Article
42
- Internal Auditor, 1998, v. 55, n. 4, p. 15
- Article
43
- Health Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine, 2008, v. 18, n. 2, p. 441
- Article
44
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2008, v. 53, n. 1, p. 95, doi. 10.1177/0003603X0805300107
- Article
45
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2008, v. 53, n. 1, p. 51, doi. 10.1177/0003603X0805300105
- Article
46
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2008, v. 53, n. 1, p. 35, doi. 10.1177/0003603X0805300104
- Durrance, Christine Piette
- Article
47
- Antitrust Bulletin, 2008, v. 53, n. 1, p. 5, doi. 10.1177/0003603X0805300103
- Article
48
- European Competition Journal, 2010, v. 6, n. 2, p. 475, doi. 10.5235/174410510792283772
- Article
49
- Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation, 2014, v. 29, n. 2, p. 331
- Article
50
- 2000
- Hostetler, Dennis W.;
- Pynes, Joan B.
- Editorial