Works by Srebniak, M.I.

Results: 8

Pregnant couples at increased risk for common aneuploidies choose maximal information from invasive genetic testing.

Published in:

Clinical Genetics, 2015, v. 88, n. 1, p. 25, doi. 10.1111/cge.12479

By:

van der Steen, S.L.;
Diderich, K.E.M.;
Riedijk, S.R.;
Verhagen‐Visser, J.;
Govaerts, L.C.P.;
Joosten, M.;
Knapen, M.F.C.M.;
Van Opstal, D.;
Srebniak, M.I.;
Tibben, A.;
Galjaard, R.J.H.

Publication type:

Article

Another Rare Case of a Child with de novo Terminal 9p Deletion and Co-Existing Interstitial 9p Duplication: Clinical Findings and Molecular Cytogenetic Study by Array-CGH.

Published in:

Cytogenetic & Genome Research, 2012, v. 139, n. 1, p. 9, doi. 10.1159/000342165

By:

Kowalczyk, M.;
Tomaszewska, a.;
Podbioł-Palenta, a.;
Constantinou, M.;
Wawrzkiewicz-Witkowska, a.;
Kowalski, J.;
Kałużewski, B.;
Zajączek, S.;
Srebniak, M.I.

Publication type:

Article

OC07.10: Is nuchal translucency of 3.0–3.49 mm an indication for NIPT or microarray? Still needs a debate.

Published in:

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2022, v. 60, p. 23, doi. 10.1002/uog.25047

By:

Rybak‐Krzyszkowska, M.;
Madetko‐Talowska, A.;
Szewczyk, K.;
Bik‐Multanowski, M.;
Sakowicz, A.;
Stejskal, D.;
Trkova, M.;
Smetanova, D.;
Serafim, S.;
Correia, H.;
Nevado, J.;
Mori, M.;
Mansila, E.;
Rutkowska, L.;
Kucinska, A.;
Gach, A.;
Huras, H.;
Kolak, M.;
Srebniak, M.I.

Publication type:

Article

P16.04: Prevalence of submicroscopic chromosome aberrations in pregnancies without increased risk for structural chromosome aberrations: a systematic review of the literature.

Published in:

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, v. 50, p. 205, doi. 10.1002/uog.18158

By:

Srebniak, M.I.;
Joosten, M.;
Knapen, M.;
Arends, L.;
Polak, M.;
Van Veen, S.;
Go, A.;
Van Opstal, D.

Publication type:

Article

P16.05: The influence of chromosomal microarray and NIPT on the diagnostic yield in 6,811 high-risk pregnancies without ultrasound anomalies.

Published in:

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, v. 50, p. 206, doi. 10.1002/uog.18159

By:

Srebniak, M.I.;
Knapen, M.;
Polak, M.;
Joosten, M.;
Diderich, K.E.;
Govaerts, L.;
Ijcken, W.F.;
Heydanus, R.;
Dijkman, A.;
Toolenaar, T.;
de Vries, F.A.;
Knijnenburg, J.;
Go, A.;
Galjaard, R.J.;
Van Opstal, D.

Publication type:

Article

EP06.03: Be aware of a diagnostic delay: Rotterdam's experience with NIPT in 1071 high-risk pregnancies.

Published in:

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, v. 50, p. 284, doi. 10.1002/uog.18407

By:

Diderich, K.E.;
Srebniak, M.I.;
Knapen, M.;
Joosten, M.;
Govaerts, L.;
Ijcken, W.F.;
Go, A.;
Galjaard, R.J.;
Van Opstal, D.

Publication type:

Article

P13.04: Does genomic microarray add prognostic information in case of the second trimester small-for-gestational age, but structurally normal fetus?

Published in:

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2014, v. 44, p. 254, doi. 10.1002/uog.14234

By:

De Wit, M.C.;
Srebniak, M.I.;
Govaerts, L.;
Joosten, M.S.;
Knapen, M.;
Galjaard, R.J.;
Go, A.

Publication type:

Article

OP35.10: What do pregnant couples want? The preferences of pregnant couples at increased risk for Down's syndrome who are offered a choice in prenatal diagnosis between the clinical outcomes of 5 Mb and 0,5 Mb whole genome SNP array analysis.

Published in:

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2014, v. 44, p. 148, doi. 10.1002/uog.13984

By:

Knapen, M.;
van der Steen, S.L.;
Riedijk, S.;
Diderich, K.;
Joosten, M.S.;
Govaerts, L.;
Opstal, D.V.;
Galjaard, R.J.;
Visser, J.;
Srebniak, M.I.;
Tibben, A.

Publication type:

Article