Found: 12
Select item for more details and to access through your institution.
EDITORS' NOTES.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter, 2014, v. 26, n. 5, p. 349
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
EDITOR'S NOTES.
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Proceeding
Realigning California Corrections.
- Published in:
- 2013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
State of Emergency: California's Correctional Crisis.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter, 2010, v. 22, n. 3, p. 133, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2010.22.3.133
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
EDITOR'S NOTES.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter, 2005, v. 18, n. 2, p. 78
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
What the Supreme Court Should Do: Save Sentencing Reform, Gut the Guidelines.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter, 2004, v. 17, n. 1, p. 46, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2004.17.1.046
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Aaron Rappaport, Rationalizing the Commission: The Philosophical Premises of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter, 2003, v. 15, n. 3, p. 213
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Panel III: Accomplishing the Purposes of Sentencing--the Role of the Courts and the Commission.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter, 2003, v. 15, n. 3, p. 179
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
EDITORS' NOTES.
- Published in:
- Federal Sentencing Reporter, 2000, v. 13, n. 1, p. 2, doi. 10.2307/20640299
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
THE INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN OF PUNISHMENT.
- Published in:
- Arizona Law Review, 2018, v. 60, n. 4, p. 913
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
An Unappreciated Constraint on the President's Pardon Power.
- Published in:
- Connecticut Law Review, 2020, v. 52, n. 1, p. 271
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Evaluation of Three Field-Based Methods for Quantifying Soil Carbon.
- Published in:
- PLoS ONE, 2013, v. 8, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1371/journal.pone.0055560
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article