IMPROVING LEGAL STATISTICS.
- Published in:
- 1990
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
Works matching AU KAYE, DAVID H.
Results: 19
1
2
Deadly statistics: quantifying an 'unacceptable risk' in capital punishment.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2017, v. 16, n. 1, p. 7, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgw012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Beyond uniqueness: the birthday paradox, source attribution and individualization in forensic science testimony.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2013, v. 12, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgs031
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Identification, individualization and uniqueness: What's the difference?†.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2009, v. 8, n. 2, p. 85, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgp018
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Case comment--People v. Nelson: a tale of two statistics.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2008, v. 7, n. 4, p. 249, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgn005
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
FIREARM-MARK EVIDENCE: LOOKING BACK AND LOOKING AHEAD.
- Published in:
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2018, v. 68, n. 3, p. 723
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
HOW GOOD IS GOOD ENOUGH?: EXPERT EVIDENCE UNDER DAUBERT AND KUMHO.
- Published in:
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2000, v. 50, n. 3, p. 645
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
THE ULTIMATE OPINION RULE AND FORENSIC SCIENCE IDENTIFICATION.
- Published in:
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2020, v. 60, n. 2, p. 175
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
A BRIEF OF GENETICS, GENOMICS AND FORENSIC SCIENCE RESEARCHERS IN MARYLAND V. KING.
- Published in:
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2013, v. 54, n. 1, p. 43
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
THE DICTIONARY AND THE DATABASE.
- Published in:
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2013, v. 53, n. 4, p. 389
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
LIKELIHOODISM, BAYESIANISM, AND A PAIR OF SHOES.
- Published in:
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2012, v. 53, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
WHERE HAVE ALL THE WOMEN GONE? THE GENDER GAP IN SUPREME COURT CLERKSHIPS.
- Published in:
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2009, v. 49, n. 4, p. 411
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Statistics in the Jury Box: How Jurors Respond to Mitochondrial DNA Match Probabilities.
- Published in:
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2007, v. 4, n. 4, p. 797, doi. 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00107.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE AND THE BURDEN OF PERSUASION.
- Published in:
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1983, v. 46, n. 4, p. 13, doi. 10.2307/1191592
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Probability, Individualization, and Uniqueness in Forensic Science Evidence.
- Published in:
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2010, v. 75, n. 4, p. 1163
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Statistical Reasoning in Law and Public Policy (Book).
- Published in:
- 1989
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
17
WHY SO CONTRIVED? FOURTH AMENDMENT BALANCING, PER SE RULES, AND DNA DATABASES AFTER MARYLAND V. KING.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2014, v. 104, n. 3, p. 535
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
Questioning a Courtroom Proof of the Uniqueness of Fingerprints.
- Published in:
- International Statistical Review, 2003, v. 71, n. 3, p. 521, doi. 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2003.tb00209.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
A FOURTH AMENDMENT THEORY FOR ARRESTEE DNA AND OTHER BIOMETRIC DATABASES.
- Published in:
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2013, v. 15, n. 4, p. 1095
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article