Found: 46
Select item for more details and to access through your institution.
Trial by Cognitive Ordeal: Irrational Approaches to the Opinions of Investigators, Trial Integrity and Proof.
- Published in:
- Modern Law Review, 2024, v. 87, n. 3, p. 535, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12848
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Images, Investigators, Identification, Code D and the Court of Appeal.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2024, v. 88, n. 2, p. 130, doi. 10.1177/00220183231221865
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
A WARNING ABOUT JUDICIAL DIRECTIONS AND WARNINGS.
- Published in:
- Adelaide Law Review, 2023, v. 44, n. 1, p. 194
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
FACIAL RECOGNITION AND IMAGE COMPARISON EVIDENCE: IDENTIFICATION BY INVESTIGATORS, FAMILIARS, EXPERTS, SUPER-RECOGNISERS AND ALGORITHMS.
- Published in:
- Melbourne University Law Review, 2021, v. 45, n. 1, p. 99
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Public attitudes towards the use of automatic facial recognition technology in criminal justice systems around the world.
- Published in:
- PLoS ONE, 2021, v. 16, n. 10, p. 1, doi. 10.1371/journal.pone.0258241
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Fingerprint Comparison and Adversarialism: The Scientific and Historical Evidence.
- Published in:
- Modern Law Review, 2020, v. 83, n. 6, p. 1287, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12565
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
An expert–novice comparison of feature choice.
- Published in:
- Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2020, v. 34, n. 5, p. 984, doi. 10.1002/acp.3676
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Exploring juror evaluations of expert opinions using the Expert Persuasion Expectancy framework.
- Published in:
- Legal & Criminological Psychology, 2020, v. 25, n. 2, p. 90, doi. 10.1111/lcrp.12165
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
FORENSIC SCIENCE EVIDENCE, WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS AND ADVERSARIAL PROCESS.
- Published in:
- University of Queensland Law Journal, 2019, v. 38, n. 2, p. 185
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
LATENT SCIENCE: A HISTORY OF CHALLENGES TO FINGERPRINT EVIDENCE IN AUSTRALIA.
- Published in:
- University of Queensland Law Journal, 2019, v. 38, n. 2, p. 301
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
FORENSIC SCIENCE EVIDENCE AND THE LIMITS OF CROSS-EXAMINATION.
- Published in:
- Melbourne University Law Review, 2019, v. 42, n. 3, p. 858
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Just Cognition: Scientific Research on Bias and Some Implications for Legal Procedure and Decision‐Making.
- Published in:
- Modern Law Review, 2019, v. 82, n. 4, p. 633, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12424
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
ICARUS AND THE EVIDENCE ACT: SECTION 137, PROBATIVE VALUE AND TAKING FORENSIC SCIENCE EVIDENCE 'AT ITS HIGHEST'.
- Published in:
- Melbourne University Law Review, 2017, v. 41, n. 1, p. 106
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
RETHINKING EXPERT OPINION EVIDENCE.
- Published in:
- Melbourne University Law Review, 2017, v. 40, n. 3, p. 967
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
EXPERT REPORTS AND THE FORENSIC SCIENCES.
- Published in:
- University of New South Wales Law Journal, 2017, v. 40, n. 2, p. 590, doi. 10.53637/ipwz9949
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
CINDERELLA STORY? THE SOCIAL PRODUCTION OF A FORENSIC "SCIENCE".
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2016, v. 106, n. 2, p. 219
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Legal versus non-legal approaches to forensic science evidence.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2016, v. 20, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1177/1365712715613470
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Contextual bias and cross-contamination in the forensic sciences: the corrosive implications for investigations, plea bargains, trials and appeals.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2015, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgu018
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
FORENSIC SCIENCE EVIDENCE AND THE CONDITIONS FOR RATIONAL (JURY) EVALUATION.
- Published in:
- Melbourne University Law Review, 2015, v. 39, n. 1, p. 77
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
CHRISTIE, SECTION 137 AND FORENSIC SCIENCE EVIDENCE (AFTER DUPAS v THE QUEEN AND RvXY).
- Published in:
- Monash University Law Review, 2014, v. 40, n. 2, p. 389
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Before the High Court.
- Published in:
- Sydney Law Review, 2014, v. 36, n. 2, p. 323
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
COMPARING THE USE OF FORENSIC SCIENCE EVIDENCE IN AUSTRALIA, SWITZERLAND, AND THE UNITED STATES: TRANSCENDING THE ADVERSARIAL-NONADVERSARIAL DICHOTOMY.
- Published in:
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2014, v. 54, n. 3, p. 221
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
A guide to interpreting forensic testimony: scientific approaches to fingerprint evidence.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2014, v. 13, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgt011
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
THE 'SCIENCE' OF MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE.
- Published in:
- University of New South Wales Law Journal, 2014, v. 37, n. 1, p. 376
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
(AD)MINISTERING JUSTICE: EXPERT EVIDENCE AND THE PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF PROSECUTORS.
- Published in:
- University of New South Wales Law Journal, 2013, v. 36, n. 3, p. 921
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Justicia's Gaze: Surveillance, Evidence and the Criminal Trial.
- Published in:
- Surveillance & Society, 2013, v. 11, n. 3, p. 252, doi. 10.24908/ss.v11i3.4556
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Trial by Theory: A Response to Acharya's "Law's Treatment of Science: From Idealization to Understanding".
- Published in:
- Dalhousie Law Journal, 2013, v. 36, n. 1, p. 57
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Expressing evaluative forensic science opinions in a court of law.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2012, v. 11, n. 4, p. 289, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgs016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Discussion paper: A just measure of probability.
- Published in:
- Law, Probability & Risk, 2012, v. 11, n. 4, p. 365, doi. 10.1093/lpr/mgs023
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Advice for the courts? Sufficiently reliable assistance with forensic science and medicine (Part 2).
- Published in:
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2012, v. 16, n. 3, p. 263, doi. 10.1350/ijep.2012.16.3.405
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Is reliability sufficient? The Law Commission and expert evidence in international and interdisciplinary perspective (Part 1).
- Published in:
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2012, v. 16, n. 1, p. 30, doi. 10.1350/ijep.2012.16.1.391
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Procedural Fairness, the Criminal Trial and Forensic Science and Medicine.
- Published in:
- Sydney Law Review, 2011, v. 33, n. 3, p. 359
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
'Mere guesswork': CrossLingual Voice Comparisons and the Jury.
- Published in:
- Sydney Law Review, 2011, v. 33, n. 3, p. 395
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
A CONTEXTUAL APPROACH TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF THE STATE'S FORENSIC SCIENCE AND MEDICAL EVIDENCE†.
- Published in:
- University of Toronto Law Journal, 2011, v. 61, n. 3, p. 343, doi. 10.1353/tlj.2011.0025
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
UNSOUND LAW: ISSUES WITH ('EXPERT') VOICE COMPARISON EVIDENCE.
- Published in:
- Melbourne University Law Review, 2011, v. 35, n. 1, p. 52
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Atkins v The Emperor: the ‘cautious’ use of unreliable ‘expert’ opinion.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2010, v. 14, n. 2, p. 146, doi. 10.1350/ijep.2010.14.2.349
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Suspect Sciences? Evidentiary Problems with Emerging Technologies.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Digital Crime & Forensics, 2010, v. 2, n. 1, p. 40, doi. 10.4018/jdcf.2010010104
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
MERTON AND THE HOT TUB: SCIENTIFIC CONVENTIONS AND EXPERT EVIDENCE IN AUSTRALIAN CIVIL PROCEDURE.
- Published in:
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 2009, v. 72, n. 1, p. 159
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Judging the Scientific and Medical Literature: Some Legal Implications of Changes to Biomedical Research and Publication.
- Published in:
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2008, v. 28, n. 3, p. 523, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqn021
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
SUPERSIZING DAUBERT SCIENCE FOR LITIGATION AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR LEGAL PRACTICE AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH.
- Published in:
- 2007
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
Law and the uncooked - a reply.
- Published in:
- Oceania, 2004, v. 75, n. 1, p. 60, doi. 10.1002/j.1834-4461.2004.tb02866.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Daubert and the Exclusionary Ethos: The Convergence of Corporate and Judicial Attitudes towards the Admissibility of Expert Evidence in Tort Litigation*.
- Published in:
- Law & Policy, 2004, v. 26, n. 2, p. 231, doi. 10.1111/j.0265-8240.2004.00011.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Thick Decisions: Expertise, Advocacy and Reasonableness in the Federal Court of Australia.
- Published in:
- Oceania, 2004, v. 74, n. 3, p. 190, doi. 10.1002/j.1834-4461.2004.tb02850.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Constructing Miscarriages of Justice: Misunderstanding Scientific Evidence in High Profile Criminal Appeals.
- Published in:
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2002, v. 22, n. 1, p. 53, doi. 10.1093/ojls/22.1.53
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Judicial Representations of Scientific Evidence.
- Published in:
- Modern Law Review, 2000, v. 63, n. 2, p. 216, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.00260
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Survey review.
- Published in:
- 1996
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review