Found: 19
Select item for more details and to access through your institution.
The New Psychology of Expert Witness Procedure.
- Published in:
- Sydney Law Review, 2020, v. 42, n. 1, p. 69
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
A WARNING ABOUT JUDICIAL DIRECTIONS AND WARNINGS.
- Published in:
- Adelaide Law Review, 2023, v. 44, n. 1, p. 194
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Questionable Research Practices and Open Science in Quantitative Criminology.
- Published in:
- Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2023, v. 39, n. 1, p. 21, doi. 10.1007/s10940-021-09525-6
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
THE PRESUMPTION OF RESULTING TRUST AND BENEFICIARY DESIGNATIONS: WHAT'S INTENTION GOT TO DO WITH IT?
- Published in:
- Alberta Law Review, 2016, v. 54, n. 1, p. 41, doi. 10.29173/alr460
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Open forensic science.
- Published in:
- Journal of Law & the Biosciences, 2019, v. 6, n. 1, p. 255, doi. 10.1093/jlb/lsz009
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE IN EVIDENCE-BASED LAW REFORM?
- Published in:
- University of New South Wales Law Journal, 2022, v. 45, n. 3, p. 1124
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE IN EVIDENCE-BASED LAW REFORM?
- Published in:
- University of New South Wales Law Journal, 2022, v. 45, n. 3, p. 1124
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Metaresearch, Psychology, and Law: A Case Study on Implicit Bias.
- Published in:
- Connecticut Law Review, 2023, v. 56, n. 1, p. 225
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
R v Bingley and the Importance of Scientifically Guided Legal Analysis.
- Published in:
- Queen's Law Journal, 2017, v. 43, n. 1, p. 33
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
R v Bingley and the Importance of Scientifically Guided Legal Analysis.
- Published in:
- Queen's Law Journal, 2018, v. 43, n. 2, p. 33
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
RETHINKING REPLICATION IN EMPIRICAL LEGAL RESEARCH.
- Published in:
- University of Western Australia Law Review, 2022, v. 49, n. 2, p. 76
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Improving Expert Evidence: The Role of Open Science and Transparency.
- Published in:
- Ottawa Law Review, 2019, v. 50, n. 2, p. 365
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Rethinking the Ken Through the Lens of Psychological Science.
- Published in:
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 2018, v. 55, n. 3, p. 625, doi. 10.60082/2817-5069.3349
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
FORENSIC BITEMARK IDENTIFICATION EVIDENCE IN CANADA.
- Published in:
- University of British Columbia Law Review, 2019, v. 52, n. 1, p. 57
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
DRAWING THE LINE BETWEEN LAY AND EXPERT OPINION EVIDENCE.
- Published in:
- McGill Law Journal, 2017, v. 63, n. 1, p. 89, doi. 10.7202/1054352ar
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIAL ISSUE ON EXPERT EVIDENCE.
- Published in:
- University of Queensland Law Journal, 2019, v. 38, n. 2, p. 183
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
THE LEGAL AND SCIENTIFIC CHALLENGE OF BLACK BOX EXPERTISE.
- Published in:
- University of Queensland Law Journal, 2019, v. 38, n. 2, p. 237
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
THE PREJUDICES OF EXPERT EVIDENCE.
- Published in:
- Monash University Law Review, 2022, v. 48, n. 2, p. 59
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Improving the Credibility of Empirical Legal Research: Practical Suggestions for Researchers, Journals and Law Schools.
- Published in:
- Law, Technology & Humans, 2021, v. 3, n. 2, p. 107, doi. 10.5204/lthj.1875
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article