Works matching American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
2
- UCLA Law Review, 2025, v. 72, n. 1, p. 192
- Article
3
- Written Communication, 2021, v. 38, n. 3, p. 380, doi. 10.1177/07410883211007870
- Article
4
- TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 2012, v. 56, n. 1, p. 40, doi. 10.1007/s11528-011-0552-2
- Article
5
- Social Policy, 1999, v. 30, n. 2, p. 27
- Article
6
- Government Technology, 2019, v. 32, n. 3, p. 9
- Article
8
- International Social Science Review, 2019, v. 95, n. 3, p. 1
- Anyikwa, Victoria A.;
- Tecson, Christina;
- Capano, Berta
- Article
9
- Feminist Media Studies, 2017, v. 17, n. 6, p. 1107, doi. 10.1080/14680777.2017.1380428
- Article
10
- Afterimage, 1998, v. 26, n. 3, p. 4, doi. 10.1525/aft.1998.26.3.4
- Article
11
- Harvard Kennedy School Review, 2019, v. 19, p. 148
- Article
12
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2024, v. 28, n. 3, p. 741
- Article
13
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2006, v. 10, n. 2, p. 357
- Article
14
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2005, v. 9, n. 2, p. 367
- Article
15
- Princeton University Library Chronicle, 2007, v. 69, n. 1, p. 190
- Article
16
- Western Historical Quarterly, 2025, v. 56, n. 2, p. 181, doi. 10.1093/whq/whaf023
- Article
17
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 1998, v. 21, n. 2, p. 637
- Article
18
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 1997, v. 20, n. 2, p. 532
- Article
19
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 1992, v. 15, n. 1, p. 43
- Article
20
- Dissent (0012-3846), 2017, v. 64, n. 1, p. 26, doi. 10.1353/dss.2017.0006
- Article
21
- Dissent (0012-3846), 2016, v. 63, n. 2, p. 104, doi. 10.1353/dss.2016.0041
- Article
23
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2018, v. 2018, n. 5, p. 1581
- Cassell, Paul G.;
- Fowles, Richard
- Article
24
- George Mason Law Review, 2013, v. 21, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
25
- Cancer (0008543X), 2009, v. 115, n. 21, p. 4887, doi. 10.1002/cncr.24706
- Article
26
- William & Mary Law Review, 2015, v. 56, n. 4, p. 1637
- Article
28
- Peace Review, 2003, v. 15, n. 4, p. 491, doi. 10.1080/1040265032000156780
- Article
29
- Law & Society Review, 2008, v. 42, n. 2, p. 367, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2008.00345.x
- Article
30
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2010, v. 75, n. 4, p. 1277
- Article
31
- Journal of Mormon History, 2011, v. 37, n. 2, p. 146, doi. 10.2307/23291641
- Article
32
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2015, v. 66, n. 1, p. 261
- Article
33
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 2010, v. 20, n. 2, p. 473
- Article
34
- JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 2013, v. 310, n. 4, p. 357, doi. 10.1001/jama.2013.8627
- Article
35
- Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 2010, v. 22, n. 1/2, p. 183, doi. 10.1080/10538720903332602
- Article
36
- Law & Sexuality: A Review of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Legal Issues, 2023, v. 32, p. 259
- Article
37
- Regent University Law Review, 2021, v. 34, n. 1, p. 69
- Article
38
- Quinnipiac Law Review, 2012, v. 30, n. 4, p. 691
- Article
39
- Social Behavior & Personality: an international journal, 1991, v. 19, n. 3, p. 195, doi. 10.2224/sbp.1991.19.3.195
- Gibson, Gail S.;
- Manley, Shelah
- Article
40
- Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 2015, v. 55, n. 2, p. 225
- Dryer, Randy L.;
- Stroud, S. Shane
- Article
41
- Surveillance & Society, 2010, v. 8, n. 2, p. 113, doi. 10.24908/ss.v8i2.3481
- Article
42
- NARF Legal Review, 2011, v. 36, n. 1, p. 9
- Article
43
- NARF Legal Review, 2008, v. 33, n. 1, p. 5
- Article
44
- NARF Legal Review, 2009, v. 34, n. 2, p. 2
- Article
45
- Iowa Law Review, 2014, v. 100, n. 1, p. 431
- Article
46
- Newspaper Research Journal, 2005, v. 26, n. 2/3, p. 119, doi. 10.1177/073953290502600210
- Scott, David W.;
- McDonald, Christopher S.
- Article
47
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 2022, v. 48, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
48
- Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 1993, v. 21, n. 2, p. 265
- Article
49
- Social Sciences (2076-0760), 2021, v. 10, n. 10, p. 358, doi. 10.3390/socsci10100358
- Liao, Wenjie;
- Ebert, Kim;
- Hummel, Joshua R.;
- Estrada, Emily P.
- Article
50
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2013, v. 38, n. 1, p. 63, doi. 10.1353/sch.2013.0026
- Article