Works matching Supreme Court and the U.S. Constitution
2
- Public Health Reports, 2011, v. 126, n. 5, p. 750, doi. 10.1177/003335491112600518
- Rosenbaum, Sara;
- RUTKOW, LAINIE;
- VERNICK, JON S.
- Article
4
- Journal of American Studies, 1991, v. 25, n. 1, p. 145, doi. 10.1017/S0021875800028462
- Article
5
- Financial & Economic Law Review, 2024, n. 49, p. 75, doi. 10.53106/1815008X494
- Article
6
- Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 2019, v. 107, n. 4, p. 53
- Article
8
- DePaul Law Review, 2012, v. 62, n. 1, p. 63
- Article
9
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2016, v. 64, n. 2, p. 303
- Article
10
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2019, v. 86, p. 1117
- Article
11
- Syracuse Journal of International Law & Commerce, 2005, v. 33, n. 1, p. 95
- Article
12
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2017, v. 49, n. 2, p. 355
- Avelar, Paul;
- Disss, Keith
- Article
13
- Iowa Law Review, 2010, v. 95, n. 5, p. 1731
- Article
14
- Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 1986, v. 16, n. 3, p. 111
- Article
15
- Judges' Journal, 2025, v. 64, n. 2, p. 4
- Wilkins, Justice Herbert P.
- Article
16
- Hamline Journal of Public Law & Policy, 2011, v. 33, n. 1, p. 235
- Article
17
- Tennessee Bar Journal, 2016, v. 52, n. 11, p. 12
- Harvey, Emily H.;
- Hudson, Jr., David L.
- Article
18
- Social Work, 2023, v. 68, n. 2, p. 150, doi. 10.1093/sw/swad004
- Article
19
- Society, 1987, v. 24, n. 2, p. 56, doi. 10.1007/BF02695824
- Article
20
- Social Forces, 1958, v. 36, n. 3, p. 232, doi. 10.2307/2573810
- Article
21
- Marquette Benefits & Social Welfare Law Review, 2023, v. 24, n. 2, p. 181
- Article
22
- Michigan Law Review, 2016, v. 115, n. 2, p. 215
- Article
23
- Michigan Law Review, 2007, v. 105, n. 4, p. 837
- Article
24
- Michigan Law Review, 2003, v. 101, n. 8, p. 2557
- Article
25
- Michigan Law Review, 1999, v. 97, n. 7, p. 2239, doi. 10.2307/1290185
- Article
26
- Callaloo, 2003, v. 26, n. 1, p. 26, doi. 10.1353/cal.2003.0026
- Article
27
- Indiana Law Journal, 2017, v. 92, n. 2, p. 783
- Article
28
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2016, v. 40, n. 2, p. 139
- Article
30
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 2020, v. 15, n. 1, p. 183
- Article
31
- JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 2008, v. 300, n. 13, p. 1575, doi. 10.1001/jama.300.13.1575
- Article
32
- Florida Journal of International Law, 2012, v. 24, n. 3, p. 605
- Article
34
- Boston University Law Review, 2017, v. 97, n. 3, p. 893
- Article
35
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 5, p. 1651
- Article
36
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 4, p. 1419
- Article
37
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 4, p. 1383
- Article
39
- Review of Litigation, 2007, v. 26, n. 1, p. 77
- Zariski, Daniel A.;
- Feldman, Leonard J.;
- Eaton, Malaika M.;
- Sands, Darin M.
- Article
40
- Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights, 2023, v. 28, n. 2, p. 121
- Article
41
- Emory Law Journal, 2021, v. 70, n. 4, p. 1005
- Article
42
- Emory Law Journal, 2012, v. 62, n. 2, p. 259
- Article
43
- Emory Law Journal, 2008, v. 58, n. 2, p. 547
- Article
44
- American Catholic Sociological Review, 1956, v. 17, n. 2, p. 184, doi. 10.2307/3708937
- Frasca, William R.;
- Gensert, Joseph F.
- Article
45
- University of Memphis Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 2, p. 413
- Article
46
- Kansas Law Review, 2012, p. 1257, doi. 10.17161/1808.20201
- Article
47
- Kansas Law Review, 2011, p. 681
- Article
48
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2015, v. 2015, n. 1, p. 263
- Article