Works matching DE "KIOBEL v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co."
1
- Revista Jurídica de la Universidad Autonóma de Madrid, 2011, n. 24, p. 87
- BLÁZQUEZ RODRÍGUEZ, PALOMA;
- ESPÓSITO MASSICCI, CARLOS
- Article
2
- Brooklyn Law Review, 2013, v. 78, n. 4, p. 1553
- Article
3
- Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 2018, v. 50, n. 1/2, p. 225
- Article
4
- Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 2018, v. 50, n. 1/2, p. 127
- Article
5
- Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 2018, v. 50, n. 1/2, p. 49
- Article
7
- Maryland Journal of International Law, 2013, v. 28, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
8
- Maryland Journal of International Law, 2013, v. 28, n. 1, p. 241
- Article
9
- Maryland Journal of International Law, 2013, v. 28, n. 1, p. 76
- Article
10
- Maryland Journal of International Law, 2013, v. 28, n. 1, p. 208
- Article
12
- Maryland Journal of International Law, 2013, v. 28, n. 1, p. 146
- Article
13
- Maryland Journal of International Law, 2013, v. 28, n. 1, p. 42
- Article
15
- Maryland Journal of International Law, 2013, v. 28, n. 1, p. 28
- Article
16
- Boston University Law Review, 2018, v. 98, n. 2, p. 397
- DAVIS, SETH;
- WHYTOCK, CHRISTOPHER A.
- Article
17
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
18
- Review of Litigation, 2016, v. 35, n. 1, p. 1
- Stengel, James L.;
- Pieper Trautmann, Kristina
- Article
19
- Review of Litigation, 2014, v. 33, n. 2, p. 333
- Article
20
- Emory Law Journal, 2014, v. 63, n. 5, p. 1089
- Article
21
- Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 2014, v. 46, n. 1, p. 158
- Article
22
- Michigan Journal of International Law, 2016, v. 37, n. 3, p. 539
- Article
23
- Alberta Law Review, 2014, v. 52, n. 2, p. 389
- FAIRHURST, SEAN E.D.;
- THOMS, ZOË
- Article
25
- 2014
- Moringiello, Juliet M.;
- Reynolds, William L.
- Essay
27
- Transnational Legal Theory, 2016, v. 7, n. 3, p. 287, doi. 10.1080/20414005.2016.1264669
- Article
28
- Transnational Legal Theory, 2016, v. 7, n. 2, p. 155, doi. 10.1080/20414005.2016.1264656
- Article
29
- Transnational Legal Theory, 2014, v. 5, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.5235/20414005.5.1.1
- Article
30
- University of Miami Business Law Review, 2015, v. 24, n. 1, p. 111
- Article
31
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2016, v. 44, n. 2, p. 451
- Article
32
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2011, v. 40, n. 1, p. 175
- Article
33
- California Law Review, 2014, v. 102, n. 6, p. 1496
- Article
34
- Southern Law Journal, 2014, v. 24, n. 2, p. 291
- SMITH, AMY;
- LOWERY, CARRIE
- Article
35
- Houston Law Review, 2012, v. 50, n. 2, p. 653
- Article
36
- Virginia Law Review, 2016, v. 102, n. 2, p. 289
- Article
37
- Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2015, v. 13, n. 2, p. 353, doi. 10.1093/jicj/mqv025
- Article
38
- Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2014, v. 12, n. 3, p. 579
- Article
39
- Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2014, v. 12, n. 3, p. 593, doi. 10.1093/jicj/mqu040
- Article
42
- European Journal of International Law, 2017, v. 28, n. 1, p. 147, doi. 10.1093/ejil/chx003
- Article
43
- Emory International Law Review, 2020, v. 34, n. 4, p. 997
- Article
44
- Emory International Law Review, 2014, v. 29, n. 1, p. 119
- Article
45
- Emory International Law Review, 2012, v. 26, n. 1, p. 227
- Article
46
- Australian International Law Journal, 2013, v. 20, n. 1, p. 131
- Article
47
- Australian International Law Journal, 2011, v. 18, n. 1, p. 131
- Article
48
- University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 2016, v. 47, n. 2, p. 263
- Article
49
- Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2016, v. 25, n. 1, p. 291
- Article
50
- Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2014, v. 22, n. 2, p. 411
- Article