Works matching DE "ATTITUDES of U.S. Supreme Court justices"
1
- California Law Review, 2012, v. 100, n. 5, p. 1101
- Article
2
- Touro Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
3
- Touro Law Review, 2017, v. 33, n. 1, p. 371
- Article
4
- Touro Law Review, 2015, v. 31, n. 2, p. 187
- Article
5
- Touro Law Review, 2015, v. 31, n. 1, p. 133
- Article
6
- Public Choice, 2015, v. 163, n. 1/2, p. 167, doi. 10.1007/s11127-014-0216-9
- Article
7
- Denver Law Review, 2019, v. 96, n. 4, p. 793
- BALLINGRUD, GORDON;
- JAMMO, CAITLEIN
- Article
8
- Denver Law Review, 2018, v. 95, n. 3, p. 809
- Article
9
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2023, v. 46, n. 3, p. 1331
- Article
10
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2019, v. 42, n. 3, p. 971
- Article
11
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2018, v. 41, n. 1, p. 139
- Article
12
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2017, v. 40, n. 2, p. 539
- Article
15
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2016, v. 39, n. 2, p. 371
- Article
17
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2013, v. 36, n. 2, p. 457
- Article
18
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2013, v. 36, n. 1, p. 211
- Article
19
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2017, v. 107, n. 4, p. 521
- Article
20
- BYU Journal of Public Law, 2013, v. 28, n. 1, p. 117
- Yates, Jeff;
- Moeller, Justin;
- Levey, Brian
- Article
21
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2018, v. 2018, n. 1, p. 57
- Gedicks, Frederick Mark;
- Jennings, Waylon
- Article
22
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 6, p. 1953
- Article
23
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 6, p. 1837
- Article
24
- Southern California Law Review, 2016, v. 89, n. 3, p. 457
- Article
25
- Southern California Law Review, 2013, v. 86, n. 2, p. 205
- Article
27
- William & Mary Law Review, 2015, v. 56, n. 4, p. 1339
- Article
28
- William & Mary Law Review, 2015, v. 56, n. 3, p. 667
- Article
29
- Creighton Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 2, p. 167
- Article
30
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2019, v. 86, n. 4, p. 871
- Article
31
- Quarterly Journal of Speech, 2022, v. 108, n. 4, p. 418, doi. 10.1080/00335630.2022.2131215
- Article
32
- New York University Law Review, 2013, v. 88, n. 5, p. 1665
- Article
35
- Michigan Journal of Race & Law, 2020, v. 26, n. 1, p. 65, doi. 10.36643/mjrl.26.1.predicting
- Article
36
- Cardozo Law Review, 2014, v. 35, n. 6, p. 2397
- Smith, Robert J.;
- Sarma, Bidish J.;
- Cull, Sophie
- Article
37
- Capital University Law Review, 2017, v. 45, n. 3, p. 457
- SMITH, CHRISTOPHER E.;
- PETLAKH, KSENIA
- Article
38
- Akron Law Review, 2017, v. 50, n. 2, p. 203
- Article
39
- Akron Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1
- Article
40
- Cornell Law Review, 2018, v. 103, n. 4, p. 817
- Bennett, Thomas B.;
- Friedman, Barry;
- Martin, Andrew D.;
- Smelcer, Susan Navarro
- Article
42
- Cornell Law Review, 2015, v. 100, n. 4, p. 769
- Article
43
- Minnesota Law Review, 2017, v. 101, n. 2, p. 1247
- Article
44
- Minnesota Law Review, 2017, v. 101, n. 1, p. 1247
- Article
46
- Minnesota Law Review, 2012, v. 97, n. 2, p. 625
- Article
47
- Denver University Law Review, 2014, v. 91, n. 2, p. 369
- Article
48
- Denver University Law Review, 2014, v. 91, n. 2, p. 221
- SAWYER III, LOGAN EVERETT
- Article
49
- Denver University Law Review, 2012, v. 89, n. 1, p. 197
- Article
50
- Denver University Law Review, 2012, v. 89, n. 1, p. 133
- Article