TEXT, PRECEDENT, AND THE CONSTITUTION: SOME ORIGINALIST AND NORMATIVE ARGUMENTS FOR OVERRULING PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA v. CASEY.
- Published in:
- Constitutional Commentary, 2005, v. 22, n. 2, p. 311
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
Results: 146
1
2
State Abortion Policies, Targeted Regulation of Abortion Provider Laws, and Abortion Demand.
- Published in:
- Review of Policy Research, 2010, v. 27, n. 5, p. 577, doi. 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00460.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Undue Burdens and Potential Opportunities in Voting Rights and Abortion Law.
- Published in:
- Indiana Law Journal, 2018, v. 93, n. 1, p. 139
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
EXPLORING THE BOUNDARIES OF OBERGEFELL.
- Published in:
- William & Mary Law Review, 2017, v. 58, n. 6, p. 2063
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Casey, Camnitz, and Compelled Speech: Why the Fourth Circuit's Interpretation of Casey Sets the Right Standard for Speech-and-Display Provisions.
- Published in:
- North Carolina Law Review, 2016, v. 94, n. 3, p. 1037
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Whole Woman's Health and the Supreme Court's Kaleidoscopic Review of Constitutional Rights.
- Published in:
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2015, p. 153
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
After Life: Governmental Interests and the New Antiabortion Incrementalism.
- Published in:
- University of Miami Law Review, 2018, v. 73, n. 1, p. 78
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Falling into the TRAP: The ineffectiveness of 'undue burden' analysis in protecting women's right to choose.
- Published in:
- Pace Law Review, 2014, v. 34, n. 2, p. 947, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.1864
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
Upholding a 40-Year-Old Promise: Why the Texas Sonogram Act is Unlawful According to Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
- Published in:
- Pace Law Review, 2013, v. 34, n. 1, p. 129
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
THE INSULAR CITIZENS: AMERICA'S LOST ELECTORATE V. STARE DECISIS.
- Published in:
- Cardozo Law Review, 2016, v. 38, n. 2, p. 797
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
Say It Ain't Roe: Dobbs and Reason Bans Are Trojan Horses for the Down Syndrome Community.
- Published in:
- Minnesota Law Review, 2022, v. 107, n. 2, p. 817
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
"I DON'T WANT TO DIE, BUT I AM DYING": REEXAMINING PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE IN A NEW AGE OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS.
- Published in:
- Arizona Law Review, 2018, v. 60, n. 2, p. 509
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
LITIGATING ABORTION ACCESS CASES IN THE POSTWINDSOR WORLD.
- Published in:
- Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2015, v. 29, n. 1, p. 143
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
PROTECTING PRENATAL PERSONS: DOES THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT PROHIBIT ABORTION?
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2017, v. 40, n. 2, p. 539
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
JUDICIAL REVIEW OF UNENUMERATED RIGHTS: DOES MARBURY'S HOLDING APPLY IN A POST-WARREN COURT WORLD?
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2005, v. 28, n. 3, p. 713
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
UNDUE SCHIZOPHRENIA: SPLIT DECISIONS, CONFUSED SCHOLARS, AND REVERSING UNWORKABLE ABORTION PRECEDENT.
- Published in:
- Willamette Law Review, 2018, v. 54, n. 2, p. 219
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Informed Consent as Compelled Professional Speech: Fictions, Facts, and Open Questions.
- Published in:
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2016, v. 50, p. 11
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
THE BURDEN IS UNDUE: WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH AND THE EVOLUTION, CLARIFICATION, AND APPLICATION OF THE UNDUE BURDEN STANDARD.
- Published in:
- George Mason Law Review, 2017, v. 24, n. 5, p. 1271
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
THE FAILED PURPOSE PRONG: WOMEN'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE IN THEORY, NOT IN FACT, UNDER THE UNDUE BURDEN STANDARD.
- Published in:
- Lewis & Clark Law Review, 2014, v. 18, n. 2, p. 469
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
UNIVERSAL ARGUMENTS AND PARTICULAR ARGUMENTS ON ABORTION RIGHTS.
- Published in:
- Maryland Law Review, 2015, v. 75, n. 1, p. 247
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
GONZALES, CASEY, AND THE VIABILITY RULE.
- Published in:
- 2009
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
22
LIBERTY FINDS NO REFUGE: THE DOUBTFILLED FUTURE OF CASEY'S UNDUE BURDEN STANDARD.
- Published in:
- Michigan State Law Review, 2019, v. 2019, n. 1, p. 23
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
THE TRUE JURISPRUDENCE OF DOUBT: THE THRESHOLD QUESTIONS OF PERSONHOOD THAT THE SUPREME COURT WOULDN'T, COULDN'T, AND SHOULDN'T ANSWER.
- Published in:
- Regent University Law Review, 2016, v. 29, n. 1, p. 155
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
Iowa's Unconstitutional Ban on Tele-Medicine Abortions.
- Published in:
- Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 2016, v. 19, n. 2, p. 351
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
UNDUE BURDEN AND THE LAW OF ABORTION IN ARIZONA.
- Published in:
- Arizona State Law Journal, 2012, v. 44, n. 1, p. 391
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
CASEY AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: REVISITING AN OLD CASE TO RESOLVE A NEW COMPELLED SPEECH CONTROVERSY.
- Published in:
- South Carolina Law Review, 2015, v. 66, n. 4, p. 951
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
Giving Casey Its Bite Back: The Role of Rational Basis Review in Undue Burden Analysis.
- Published in:
- Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 2013, v. 48, n. 2, p. 279
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
THE GENETIC FALLACY AND A LIVING CONSTITUTION.
- Published in:
- Constitutional Commentary, 2019, v. 34, n. 3, p. 429
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
THE DOCTOR REQUIREMENT: GRISWOLD, PRIVACY, AND AT-HOME REPRODUCTIVE CARE.
- Published in:
- Constitutional Commentary, 2017, v. 32, n. 2, p. 341
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
The Supreme Court, Abortion, and the Jurisprudence of Class.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Public Health, 1992, v. 82, n. 11, p. 1556, doi. 10.2105/AJPH.82.11.1556
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
MONEY MATTERS: WHY THE ADA'S UNDUE HARDSHIP FRAMEWORK COULD SAVE CASEY AND LEGAL ABORTION IN AMERICA.
- Published in:
- University of Colorado Law Review, 2017, v. 88, n. 2, p. 429
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
The Smokescreen Problem in Abortion Jurisprudence: How the Undue Burden Standard and Long-Term Legislative Tactics Allow Courts to Turn a Blind Eye to True Legislative Intent.
- Published in:
- Missouri Law Review, 2020, v. 85, n. 4, p. 1139
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
Privacy: Pre- and Post-Dobbs.
- Published in:
- Duquesne Law Review, 2023, v. 61, n. 1, p. 62
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
ABORTION, PERSUASION, AND EMOTION: IMPLICATIONS OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH ON EMOTION FOR READING CASEY.
- Published in:
- Washington Law Review, 2008, v. 83, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
GIVE ME BACK MY BIG GULP! THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF OBESITY REGULATIONS UNDER THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE.
- Published in:
- Tennessee Law Review, 2013, v. 80, n. 4, p. 847
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
RELIANCE BY WHOM? THE FALSE PROMISE OF SOCIETAL RELIANCE IN STARE DECISIS ANALYSIS.
- Published in:
- New York University Law Review, 2017, v. 92, n. 6, p. 2094
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
THE FUTURE OF WOMEN'S HEALTH ANALYSIS IN CONTESTED ABORTION REGULATIONS.
- Published in:
- University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 2018, v. 79, n. 3, p. 563, doi. 10.5195/lawreview.2018.570
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
THE EMERGING USE OF A BALANCING APPROACH IN CASEY'S UNDUE BURDEN ANALYSIS.
- Published in:
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2015, v. 18, n. 2, p. 657
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
CONTEMPORARY CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS: ACCOUNTING FOR CHANGED FACTUAL CONDITIONS UNDER THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE.
- Published in:
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2014, v. 17, n. 2, p. 591
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
AN "EXCEPTION"-ALLY DIFFICULT SITUATION: DO THE EXCEPTIONS, OR LACK THEREOF, TO THE "SPEECH-AND-DISPLAY REQUIREMENTS" FOR ABORTION INVALIDATE THEIR USE AS INFORMED CONSENT?
- Published in:
- Georgia State University Law Review, 2014, v. 30, n. 2, p. 521
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
THE FIVE DAYS IN JUNE WHEN VALUES DIED IN AMERICAN LAW.
- Published in:
- Akron Law Review, 2016, v. 49, n. 1, p. 115
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
JUSTICE SOUTER'S COMMON LAW.
- Published in:
- Virginia Law Review, 2018, v. 104, n. 4, p. 655
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
THE CHANGING TIDES OF NORTH DAKOTA ABORTION LEGISLATION.
- Published in:
- North Dakota Law Review, 2023, v. 98, n. 3, p. 409
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
ABORTION AND BIRTH CONTROL-UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECLARES TEXAS’ RESTRICTIONS ON ABORTION FACILITIES UNCONSTITUTIONAL: IMPACT ON STATES WITH SIMILAR ABORTION RESTRICTIONS.
- Published in:
- North Dakota Law Review, 2016, v. 92, n. 1, p. 213
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
ABORTION AND BIRTH CONTROL - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: CONSTITUTIONALITY OF NORTH DAKOTA'S LEGISLATIVE BAN ON ABORTIONS BEFORE VIABILITY.
- Published in:
- North Dakota Law Review, 2014, v. 90, n. 1, p. 211
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
Casey and a Woman's Right to Know: Ultrasounds, Informed Consent, and the First Amendment.
- Published in:
- Connecticut Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 2, p. 595
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
Keynote Address: Untying the Moral Knot of Abortion.
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Speech
48
If the Purpose Fits: The Two Functions of Casey's Purpose Inquiry.
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
49
Abortion Exceptionalism and Undue Burden Preemption.
- Published in:
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2014, v. 71, n. 2, p. 1047
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
Roe, Casey, and Sex-Selection Abortion Bans.
- Published in:
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2014, v. 71, n. 2, p. 1089
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article