Works matching DE "LOGICAL atomism"
1
- British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 2008, v. 16, n. 3, p. 625, doi. 10.1080/09608780802200760
- Article
2
- Agora (0211-6642), 2013, v. 32, n. 1, p. 27
- Article
3
- Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies, 2022, v. 42, n. 2, p. 132, doi. 10.1353/rss.2022.0014
- Article
4
- Journal of International Social Research, 2021, v. 14, n. 81, p. 71
- Article
5
- Epistemologia, 2008, v. 31, n. 1, p. 75
- Article
6
- Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy, 2013, v. 32, n. 2, p. 267, doi. 10.1007/s11245-012-9130-2
- Article
7
- Sign Systems Studies, 2002, v. 30, n. 2, p. 513, doi. 10.12697/sss.2002.30.2.10
- Article
8
- Philosophia, 2021, v. 49, n. 1, p. 95, doi. 10.1007/s11406-020-00245-y
- Article
9
- Philosophia, 2021, v. 49, n. 1, p. 393, doi. 10.1007/s11406-020-00246-x
- Article
10
- Philosophia, 2016, v. 44, n. 1, p. 117, doi. 10.1007/s11406-015-9681-8
- Article
11
- Philosophia, 2014, v. 42, n. 3, p. 713, doi. 10.1007/s11406-014-9533-y
- Article
12
- Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2006, v. 25, p. 425, doi. 10.1613/jair.1675
- Kersting, Kristian;
- De Raedt, Luc;
- Raiko, Tapani
- Article
13
- Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory, 2013, v. 41, n. 2, p. 245, doi. 10.1080/03017605.2013.805025
- Article
14
- Monist, 2004, v. 87, n. 3, p. 339
- Hawthorne, John;
- Weatherson, Brian
- Article
15
- Sociological Focus, 2005, v. 38, n. 1, p. 65, doi. 10.1080/00380237.2005.10571257
- Article
16
- Sociologia del Diritto, 2014, v. 41, n. 2, p. 63
- Article
17
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 2015, v. 78, n. 1/2, p. 185
- Article
18
- Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 2014, v. 92, n. 1, p. 165, doi. 10.1080/00048402.2013.840322
- Article
19
- Muse India, 2013, n. 51, p. 63
- Article
20
- Synthese, 2014, v. 191, n. 5, p. 779, doi. 10.1007/s11229-013-0299-8
- Article
21
- Man & the Word / Zmogus ir zodis, 2008, v. 10, n. 4, p. 15
- Article
22
- Philosophical Quarterly, 1981, v. 31, n. 124, p. 242, doi. 10.2307/2219113
- Article
24
- Teorema, 2021, v. 40, n. 2, p. 11
- Article
25
- Teorema, 2012, v. 31, n. 2, p. 21
- Article
26
- Philosophical Studies, 2010, v. 150, n. 3, p. 349, doi. 10.1007/s11098-009-9411-9
- Article
27
- Language & Speech, 2005, v. 48, n. 1, p. 91, doi. 10.1177/00238309050480010501
- Article
29
- Philosophical Studies, 2015, v. 172, n. 2, p. 321, doi. 10.1007/s11098-014-0305-0
- Article
30
- Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (FLSF), 2011, n. 11, p. 41
- Article
31
- Encounter, 2011, v. 24, n. 2, p. 55
- Article
32
- Political Studies, 2003, v. 51, n. 4, p. 722, doi. 10.1111/j.0032-3217.2003.00455.x
- Article
33
- Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 2000, v. 81, n. 3, p. 325, doi. 10.1111/1468-0114.00108
- Article
34
- Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1988, v. 12, n. 1, p. 29, doi. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035046
- Article
35
- Value Inquiry Book Series, 2023, v. 393, p. 154, doi. 10.1163/9789004682900_016
- Gordon, John-Stewart;
- Mosakas, Kęstutis
- Article
36
- Southern Journal of Philosophy, 2002, v. 40, n. 1, p. 59, doi. 10.1111/j.2041-6962.2002.tb01889.x
- Article
37
- Virginia Law Review, 2010, v. 96, n. 3, p. 549
- Van Houweling, Molly Shaffer
- Article