Works matching DE "UNITED States. District Court (New York : Southern District)"
1
- Defense Counsel Journal, 2014, v. 81, n. 1, p. 95
- Article
2
- Environmental Claims Journal, 2011, v. 23, n. 1, p. 75, doi. 10.1080/10406026.2011.545711
- Chesler, Robert D.;
- Masilamani, Priya Rebecca
- Article
3
- 2010
- Kowalski, Thomas J.;
- Lu, Deborah L.
- Opinion
4
- Tulane Maritime Law Journal, 2013, v. 37, n. 2, p. 605
- Article
5
- Tulane Maritime Law Journal, 2011, v. 35, n. 2, p. 607
- Article
6
- Tulane Maritime Law Journal, 2011, v. 35, n. 2, p. 585
- Article
8
- Tulane Maritime Law Journal, 2009, v. 34, n. 1, p. 303
- Article
9
- Tulane Maritime Law Journal, 2009, v. 33, n. 2, p. 661
- Article
10
- Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, 2014, v. 17, p. 375
- Article
11
- Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, 2013, v. 16, p. 287
- Article
12
- Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, 2011, v. 14, p. 365
- Article
13
- Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, 2008, v. 11, p. 157
- Article
14
- Touro Law Review, 2013, v. 29, n. 4, p. 1025
- Article
15
- Braille Monitor, 2009, v. 52, n. 10, p. 805
- Article
16
- Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 2014, v. 24, n. 3, p. 529
- Article
17
- Regulation, 2015, v. 38, n. 4, p. 13
- Article
18
- DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 2009, v. 20, n. 1, p. 199
- Article
19
- Alabama Law Review, 2014, v. 65, n. 2, p. 539
- Cornett, Rhojonda A. Debrow
- Article
20
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2011, v. 26, n. 1, p. 586
- Article
21
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2008, v. 23, n. 1, p. 503
- Article
22
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2007, v. 22, n. 1, p. 381
- Article
23
- Seton Hall Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law, 2013, v. 23, n. 2, p. 411
- Article
24
- Iowa Law Review, 2023, v. 108, n. 3, p. 1403
- Article
25
- Journal of Science & Technology Law, 2012, v. 18, n. 2, p. 343
- Article
26
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, v. 8, n. 8, p. 590, doi. 10.1093/jiplp/jpt090
- Article
28
- Seattle University Law Review, 2011, v. 34, n. 4, p. 1545
- Article
29
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2014, v. 33, n. 1, p. 237
- Article
30
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2014, v. 32, n. 3, p. 995
- Article
31
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2013, v. 31, n. 3, p. 893
- Article
32
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2012, v. 30, n. 2, p. 369
- Article
33
- European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL), 2019, v. 5, n. 2, p. 266, doi. 10.21552/edpl/2019/2/18
- Rotenberg, Marc;
- Petkova, Bilyana
- Article
35
- New York Law School Law Review, 2004, v. 49, n. 1, p. 425
- Article
36
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2016, v. 52, p. 255
- Article
37
- Touro Law Review, 2012, v. 28, n. 3, p. 687
- Article
38
- Duke Law & Technology Review, 2012, v. 11, n. 1, p. 145
- Article
39
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology, 2012, v. 18, n. 2, p. 1
- Article
40
- University of Miami Law Review, 2015, v. 69, n. 2, p. 367
- Article
41
- Journal of Marketing, 1990, v. 54, n. 4, p. 106
- Werner, Ray O.;
- Reid, Brad
- Article
42
- Journal of Marketing, 1981, v. 45, n. 4, p. 135
- Werner, Ray O.;
- Tower, C. Burk
- Article
43
- Journal of Marketing, 1965, v. 29, n. 2, p. 72
- Werner, Ray O.;
- Hartman, George E.
- Article
44
- Journal of Marketing, 1965, v. 29, n. 1, p. 74
- Werner, Ray O.;
- Phillips Jr., Charles F.
- Article
45
- Computer Law Review International, 2016, v. 17, n. 4, p. 118, doi. 10.9785/cri-2016-0405
- Article
46
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2014, v. 163, n. 1, p. 249
- Article
48
- Journal of Marketing, 1960, v. 25, n. 1, p. 81
- Article
49
- Journal of Marketing, 1954, v. 19, n. 2, p. 202
- Article
50
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2013, v. 108, n. 1, p. 311
- Article