Works matching IS 01629174 AND DT 2013 AND VI 39 AND IP 1
Results: 6
SHIELDS AND KIRPANS: HOW RFRA PROMOTES "IRRATIONAL-BASIS" REVIEW AS FOR-PROFIT COMPANIES CHALLENGE THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT'S WOMEN'S HEALTH AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- University of Dayton Law Review, 2013, v. 39, n. 1, p. 173
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
CONTRACEPTION AND CORPORATE PERSONHOOD: DOES THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECT FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS THAT OPPOSE THE EMPLOYER MANDATE?
- Published in:
- University of Dayton Law Review, 2013, v. 39, n. 1, p. 138
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
BLURRING THE BOUNDARIES: HOW THE ADDITIONAL GROUNDS FOR POST-GRANT REVIEW IN THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT RAISE ISSUES WITH SEPARATION OF POWERS AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT.
- Published in:
- University of Dayton Law Review, 2013, v. 39, n. 1, p. 112
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
PARALLEL INVESTIGATIONS BETWEEN ADMINISTRATIVE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES: A QUESTION OF CIVIL LIBERTIES.
- Published in:
- University of Dayton Law Review, 2013, v. 39, n. 1, p. 77
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
TAMING A DRAGON: LEGISLATIVE HISTORY IN LEGAL ANALYSIS.
- Published in:
- University of Dayton Law Review, 2013, v. 39, n. 1, p. 37
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
OTHER PEOPLE'S VOLATILITY: A CALL FOR RULES THAT MORE EQUITABLY STABILIZE THE STOCK MARKET.
- Published in:
- University of Dayton Law Review, 2013, v. 39, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article