Connecting you to content on EBSCOhost

Works matching IS 01629174 AND DT 2013 AND VI 39 AND IP 1

Results: 6

1

SHIELDS AND KIRPANS: HOW RFRA PROMOTES "IRRATIONAL-BASIS" REVIEW AS FOR-PROFIT COMPANIES CHALLENGE THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT'S WOMEN'S HEALTH AMENDMENT.

Published in:

University of Dayton Law Review, 2013, v. 39, n. 1, p. 173

By:

Urch, Emily

Publication type:

Article

2

BLURRING THE BOUNDARIES: HOW THE ADDITIONAL GROUNDS FOR POST-GRANT REVIEW IN THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT RAISE ISSUES WITH SEPARATION OF POWERS AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT.

Published in:

University of Dayton Law Review, 2013, v. 39, n. 1, p. 112

By:

Christoff, Benjamin J.

Publication type:

Article

3

CONTRACEPTION AND CORPORATE PERSONHOOD: DOES THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECT FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS THAT OPPOSE THE EMPLOYER MANDATE?

Published in:

University of Dayton Law Review, 2013, v. 39, n. 1, p. 138

By:

Lyle, John

Publication type:

Article

4

PARALLEL INVESTIGATIONS BETWEEN ADMINISTRATIVE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES: A QUESTION OF CIVIL LIBERTIES.

Published in:

University of Dayton Law Review, 2013, v. 39, n. 1, p. 77

By:

Narayan Persaud, Shiv

Publication type:

Article

5

TAMING A DRAGON: LEGISLATIVE HISTORY IN LEGAL ANALYSIS.

Published in:

University of Dayton Law Review, 2013, v. 39, n. 1, p. 37

By:

DeForrest, Mark

Publication type:

Article

6

OTHER PEOPLE'S VOLATILITY: A CALL FOR RULES THAT MORE EQUITABLY STABILIZE THE STOCK MARKET.

Published in:

University of Dayton Law Review, 2013, v. 39, n. 1, p. 1

By:

Scott Colesanti, J.

Publication type:

Article