Works matching United States Congress powers
1
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2015, v. 50, n. 1, p. 321
- Article
2
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2015, v. 49, n. 3, p. 723
- Article
3
- American University Law Review, 2013, v. 62, n. 6, p. 1587
- Article
5
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2019, v. 42, n. 1, p. 29
- Article
6
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2017, v. 40, n. 2, p. 417
- Article
7
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2015, v. 38, n. 1, p. 337
- Article
8
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2015, v. 38, n. 1, p. 267
- Article
11
- BYU Journal of Public Law, 2014, v. 29, n. 1, p. 99
- Article
12
- William & Mary Law Review, 2014, v. 56, n. 1, p. 59
- Article
13
- Creighton Law Review, 2013, v. 46, n. 4, p. 721
- Article
14
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 1997, v. 47, n. 3, p. 921
- Litman, Harry;
- Greenberg, Mark D.
- Article
15
- American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 2014, v. 88, n. 4, p. 411
- Article
17
- Minnesota Law Review, 2017, v. 101, n. 6, p. 2167
- Mulligan, Lumen N.;
- Staszewski, Glen
- Article
18
- Minnesota Law Review, 2013, v. 97, n. 3, p. 838
- Article
19
- Yale Law Journal, 2018, v. 128, n. 1, p. 166
- Article
20
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2015, v. 40, n. 2, p. 133, doi. 10.1353/sch.2015.0012
- Article
21
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 4, p. 1459
- Article
22
- Texas Law Review, 2017, v. 95, n. 6, p. 1451
- Article
23
- Texas Law Review, 1999, v. 78, n. 1, p. 173
- Article
24
- International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2007, v. 5, n. 2, p. 380, doi. 10.1093/icon/mom009
- Article
25
- University of Miami Law Review, 2011, v. 66, n. 1, p. 259
- Article
26
- Journal of Law & Politics, 2009, v. 25, n. 1, p. 41
- Article
27
- Georgia Law Review, 2011, v. 46, n. 1, p. 117
- Article
28
- Houston Journal of International Law, 2000, v. 22, n. 2, p. 209
- Article
29
- Wake Forest Law Review, 2016, v. 51, n. 5, p. 941
- Article
30
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2009, v. 2009, n. 2, p. 327
- Article
31
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 1999, v. 1999, n. 1, p. 75
- Article
33
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 2015, v. 78, n. 3, p. 129
- Article
34
- American Journal of Law & Medicine, 2012, v. 38, n. 2/3, p. 516, doi. 10.1177/009885881203800210
- Willis, Steven J.;
- Chung, Nakku
- Article
35
- Florida State University Law Review, 2014, v. 42, n. 1, p. 255
- Article
36
- Virginia Law Review, 2015, v. 101, n. 5, p. 1289
- Article
37
- Virginia Law Review, 2015, v. 101, n. 3, p. 807
- Article
38
- Virginia Law Review, 2015, v. 101, n. 2, p. 501
- Article
39
- California Law Review, 2017, v. 105, n. 5, p. 1375, doi. 10.15779/Z38H12V721
- Farber, Daniel A.;
- O'Connell, Anne Joseph
- Article
40
- California Law Review, 2017, v. 105, n. 4, p. 985, doi. 10.15779/Z38QZ22G70
- Article
41
- California Law Review, 2017, v. 105, n. 2, p. 539, doi. 10.15779/Z38HX15Q49
- Article
42
- California Law Review, 2015, v. 103, n. 2, p. 387
- Article
43
- California Law Review, 2015, v. 103, n. 1, p. 103
- Article
44
- California Law Review, 2014, v. 102, n. 5, p. 1123
- Elmendorf, Christopher S.;
- Spencer, Douglas M.
- Article
45
- California Law Review, 2013, v. 101, n. 6, p. 1565
- Article
46
- American Journal of Political Science (Wiley-Blackwell), 1985, v. 29, n. 4, p. 721, doi. 10.2307/2111178
- Article
47
- Public Choice, 2017, v. 172, n. 3/4, p. 359, doi. 10.1007/s11127-017-0450-z
- Gray, Thomas;
- Jenkins, Jeffery
- Article
48
- Public Choice, 2014, v. 161, n. 3/4, p. 305, doi. 10.1007/s11127-014-0201-3
- Ellig, Jerry;
- Conover, Christopher
- Article
49
- American University Law Review, 2016, v. 66, n. 2, p. 539
- Article
50
- American University Law Review, 2015, v. 64, n. 3, p. 687
- Article