Works matching Judicial discretion
1
- Text & Talk, 2020, v. 40, n. 3, p. 269, doi. 10.1515/text-2020-2061
- Article
2
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2012, v. 37, n. 1, p. 4, doi. 10.1007/s12103-010-9094-y
- Maddan, Sean;
- Hartley, Richard;
- Walker, Jeffery;
- Miller, J.
- Article
3
- Law & World, 2023, v. 9, n. 2, p. 55, doi. 10.36475/9.2.5
- Article
4
- Antalya Bilim University Law Review, 2020, v. 8, n. 15, p. 165
- Article
5
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2016, v. 36, n. 2, p. 304, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqv025
- Article
6
- Novi Sad Faculty of Law: Collected Papers / Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu, 2012, v. 46, n. 2, p. 311, doi. 10.5937/zrpfns46-2084
- Article
7
- Criminology & Criminal Justice: An International Journal, 2013, v. 13, n. 5, p. 506, doi. 10.1177/1748895812458297
- Article
8
- Liverpool Law Review, 2011, v. 32, n. 3, p. 251, doi. 10.1007/s10991-011-9101-5
- Article
9
- Law & Philosophy, 1982, v. 1, n. 1, p. 21, doi. 10.1007/BF00143145
- Article
10
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2012, v. 9, n. 4, p. 729, doi. 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2012.01266.x
- Fischman, Joshua B.;
- Schanzenbach, Max M.
- Article
11
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2016, v. 28, n. 3, p. 165, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2016.28.3.165
- Article
12
- Federal Sentencing Reporter (University of California Press), 2009, v. 22, n. 2, p. 81, doi. 10.1525/fsr.2009.22.2.81
- Article
13
- Boston University Law Review, 2018, v. 98, n. 1, p. 127
- Article
14
- Temple Law Review, 2012, v. 84, n. 3, p. 637
- Article
15
- Journal of Law & Politics, 2011, v. 26, n. 2, p. 123
- Article
16
- Criminology, 1983, v. 21, n. 3, p. 309, doi. 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1983.tb00264.x
- Nagel, Stuart;
- Geraci, Robert
- Article
17
- Georgia State University Law Review, 2011, v. 27, n. 3, p. 673
- Weatherford, Christina R.
- Article
18
- Lewis & Clark Law Review, 2016, v. 20, n. 2, p. 647
- Article
19
- Ratio Juris, 2007, v. 20, n. 4, p. 506, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2007.00373.x
- Article
20
- Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 2016, v. 21, p. 221
- Sinai, Yuval;
- Alberstein, Michal
- Article
21
- Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal, 2018, v. 34, n. 2, p. 681
- Article
22
- Indiana Law Journal, 2022, v. 97, n. 4, p. 1479
- Article
23
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 2011, v. 44, n. 5, p. 1299
- Article
24
- International Journal of Punishment & Sentencing, 2011, v. 7, n. 2, p. 39
- Article
25
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2005, v. 29, n. 1, p. 331
- Article
27
- Judicial Review, 2013, v. 18, n. 4, p. 388, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2013.11426806
- Article
28
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2010, v. 7, n. 2, p. 355, doi. 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01181.x
- Freeborn, Beth A.;
- Hartmann, Monica E.
- Article
29
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2005, v. 56, n. 1, p. 65
- Article
30
- Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 2020, v. 33, n. 2, p. 369, doi. 10.1017/cjlj.2020.7
- Reyes Molina, Sebastián A.
- Article
31
- Bench & Bar of Minnesota, 2013, v. 70, n. 10, p. 28
- ALDRICH, JUDGE STEPHEN C.;
- CASS, MICHAEL
- Article
32
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1939, v. 6, n. 2, p. 213, doi. 10.2307/1189358
- Article
33
- Australian Journal of Asian Law, 2013, v. 14, n. 2, p. 1
- Missbach, Antje;
- Crouch, Melissa
- Article
34
- Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas, 2012, v. 2, n. 2, p. 39, doi. 10.5102/rbpp.v2i2.1587
- Article
36
- Administrative Law Review, 2010, v. 62, n. 2, p. 291
- Article
37
- Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 2012, v. 8, n. 1, p. 187, doi. 10.1093/joclec/nhs003
- Article
38
- Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 2015, v. 46, n. 2, p. 533
- Article
39
- Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2017, v. 92, n. 1, p. 249
- Article
40
- Hamline Journal of Public Law & Policy, 2005, v. 27, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
41
- Ethical Theory & Moral Practice, 2016, v. 19, n. 1, p. 177, doi. 10.1007/s10677-015-9608-2
- Article
42
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2023, v. 54, n. 2, p. 237
- Article
44
- Michigan Law Review, 2018, v. 117, n. 1, p. 173
- Article
45
- Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies, 2014, v. 2014, n. 3, p. 1
- Article
46
- UMKC Law Review, 2023, v. 92, n. 2, p. 235
- Calaway, Wendy R.;
- Wadian, Taylor
- Article
47
- Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal, 2006, v. 22, n. 2, p. 546
- Article
48
- Criminology & Public Policy, 2011, v. 10, n. 4, p. 1151, doi. 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00772.x
- Article
49
- Revus: Journal for Constitutional Theory & Philosophy of Law, 2023, v. 50, p. 93, doi. 10.4000/revus.9735
- Article
50
- Hofstra Law Review, 2012, v. 40, n. 3, p. 771
- Article