KATZ-ING UP AND (NOT) LOSING PLACE: TRACKING THE FOURTH AMENDMENT IMPLICATIONS OF UNITED STATES V. JONES AND PROLONGED GPS MONITORING.
- Published in:
- South Dakota Law Review, 2013, v. 58, n. 1, p. 158
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching United States v. Jones
Results: 73
1
2
THE COURT LOSES ITS WAY WITH THE GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM: UNITED STATES V. JONES RETREATS TO THE "CLASSIC TRESPASSORY SEARCH".
- Published in:
- Michigan Journal of Race & Law, 2013, v. 19, n. 1, p. 113
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
MAKING THE MOST OF UNITED STATES V. JONES IN A SURVEILLANCE SOCIETY: A STATUTORY IMPLEMENTATION OF MOSAIC THEORY.
- Published in:
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 2012, v. 8, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
NEW AGE TRACKING TECHNOLOGIES IN THE POST-UNITED STATES V. JONES ENVIRONMENT: THE NEED FOR MODEL LEGISLATION.
- Published in:
- Creighton Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 3, p. 553
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
REAL-TIME AND HISTORIC LOCATION SURVEILLANCE AFTER UNITED STATES V. JONES: AN ADMINISTRABLE, MILDLY MOSAIC APPROACH.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2013, v. 103, n. 3, p. 803
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
REFLECTIONS ON PRAGMATIC JURISPRUDENCE: A CASE STUDY OF BOB JONES UNIVERSITY V. UNITED STATES.
- Published in:
- American Business Law Journal, 1984, v. 22, n. 2, p. 227, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1984.tb00791.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Capital Punishment--Jones v. United States.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Criminal Law, 1999, v. 26, n. 3, p. 541
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
IMPLICATIONS OF UNITED STATES V. JONES ON DNA COLLECTION FROM ARRESTEES: A TRESPASS PROHIBITED BY THE FOURTH AMENDMENT?
- Published in:
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2013, v. 25, n. 2, p. 244
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
UNITED STATES V. JONES: DOES KATZ STILL HAVE NINE LIVES?
- Published in:
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2012, v. 24, n. 2, p. 101
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Sentenced for a `crime' the government did not prove: Jones v. United States and the...
- Published in:
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1998, v. 61, n. 4, p. 249, doi. 10.2307/1192438
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
THE EVOLVING FOURTH AMENDMENT: UNITED STATES v. JONES, THE INFORMATION CLOUD, AND THE RIGHT TO EXCLUDE.
- Published in:
- Maryland Law Review, 2013, v. 72, n. 3, p. 997
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
A Forgotten First: Everett J. Waring, First Black Supreme Court Advocate, and the Case of Jones v. United States.
- Published in:
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2022, v. 47, n. 3, p. 265, doi. 10.1353/sch.2022.a901693
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
LOOKING FORWARD BY LOOKING BACKWARD: UNITED STATES V. JONES PREDICTS FOURTH AMENDMENT PROPERTY RIGHTS PROTECTIONS IN E-MAIL.
- Published in:
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2014, v. 24, n. 3, p. 349
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
UNITED STATES V. JONES: THE FOOLISH REVIVAL OF THE "TRESPASS DOCTRINE" IN ADDRESSING GPS TECHNOLOGY AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- 2013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
15
The Good-Faith Exception and Unsettled Law: A Study of GPS Tracking Cases After United States v. Jones.
- Published in:
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2013, v. 74, n. 5, p. 807
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
The "Big Brother" Effect: The Implications of the Unanswered Question in United States v. Jones.
- Published in:
- University of the Pacific Law Review, 2017, v. 48, n. 2, p. 395
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
UNITED STATES V. JONES: BIG BROTHER AND THE "COMMON GOOD" VERSUS THE FOURTH AMENDMENT AND YOUR RIGHT TO PRIVACY.
- Published in:
- Tennessee Journal of Law & Policy, 2013, v. 9, n. 1, p. 7
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
U.S. v. Jones'. Inadequate to Promote Privacy for Citizens and Efficiency for Law Enforcement.
- Published in:
- Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights, 2014, v. 19, n. 2, p. 335
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
Back to the Future: The Curious Case of United States v. Jones.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
20
United States v. Jones: Fourth Amendment Applicability in the 21st Century.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
21
GPS跟監之程序適法性: ── 從美國United States v. Jones案談起.
- Published in:
- Court Case Times, 2018, n. 68, p. 24, doi. 10.3966/207798362018020068003
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
從美國最高法院United States v. Jones案分析美國政府運用GPS定位追蹤器探知個人位置資訊之適法性
- Published in:
- Taiwan Law Review, 2018, n. 272, p. 177, doi. 10.3966/102559312018010272013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
GPS TRACKING OUT OF FOURTH AMENDMENT DEAD ENDS: UNITED STATES V. JONES AND THE KATZ CONUNDRUM.
- Published in:
- North Carolina Law Review, 2012, v. 91, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
Prying Eyes: How Government Access to Third-Party Tracking Data May Be Impacted by United States v. Jones.
- Published in:
- New England Law Review, 2012, v. 46, n. 4, p. 843
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
FIGHTING CYBERCRIME AFTER UNITED STATES V. JONES.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2013, v. 103, n. 3, p. 745
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
ADVENTURES ON THE AUTOBAHN AND INFOBAHN: UNITED STATES V. JONES, MANDATORY DATA RETENTION, AND A MORE REASONABLE "REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY".
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2013, v. 103, n. 3, p. 985
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
It's Raining Katz and Jones: The Implications of United States v. Jones--A Case of Sound and Fury.
- Published in:
- Pace Law Review, 2013, v. 33, n. 2, p. 683, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.1832
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
UNITED STATES V. JONES: THE (HOPEFULLY TEMPORARY) DERAILMENT OF CELL-SITE LOCATION INFORMATION PROTECTION.
- Published in:
- Loyola Journal of Public Interest Law, 2013, v. 15, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
美國聯邦憲法增修條文第4條搜索令狀原則的新發展：以Jones, Jardines & Grady案為例.
- Published in:
- EurAmerica, 2018, v. 48, n. 2, p. 267
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
MUTUAL FUND ADVISORY FEES: FORTY YEARS OF FAILURE.
- Published in:
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law, 2022, v. 16, n. 2, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
BIG BROTHER ISN'T WATCHING: HOW STATE V. JONES TRANSFORMED WHAT ONE CAN SEE WITH A NAKED EYE INTO A FOURTH AMENDMENT SEARCH.
- Published in:
- South Dakota Law Review, 2018, v. 63, n. 2, p. 450
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
The Broken Fourth Amendment Oath.
- Published in:
- Stanford Law Review, 2022, v. 74, n. 3, p. 603
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
PRIVACY IN THE CLOUD: THE MOSAIC THEORY AND THE STORED COMMUNICATIONS ACT.
- Published in:
- Stanford Law Review, 2015, v. 67, n. 3, p. 677
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
“Incorrigibility is Inconsistent with Youth”: The Supreme Court’s Missed Opportunity to Cure the Contradiction Implicit in Discretionary JLWOP Sentencing.
- Published in:
- University of Miami Law Review, 2022, v. 76, n. 2, p. 612
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
Privacy in Public.
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
36
AERIAL TRESPASS AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2023, v. 121, n. 7, p. 1269, doi. 10.36644/mlr.121.7.aerial
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
WHAT IS CAESAR'S, WHAT IS GOD'S: FUNDAMENTAL PUBLIC POLICY FOR CHURCHES.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2021, v. 44, n. 1, p. 145
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
ORIGINAL MISUNDERSTANDINGS: THE IMPLICATIONS OF MISREADING HISTORY IN JONES.
- Published in:
- Georgia State University Law Review, 2015, v. 31, n. 3, p. 471
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
ASSUMED FACTS AND BLATANT CONTRADICTIONS IN QUALIFIED-IMMUNITY APPEALS.
- Published in:
- Georgia Law Review, 2021, v. 55, n. 3, p. 959
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
GENETIC PRIVACY & THE FOURTH AMENDMENT: UNREGULATED SURREPTITIOUS DNA HARVESTING.
- Published in:
- Georgia Law Review, 2012, v. 47, n. 2, p. 445
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
FORENSIC BORDER SEARCHES AFTER CARPENTER REQUIRE PROBABLE CAUSE AND A WARRANT.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2019, v. 118, n. 3, p. 507, doi. 10.36644/mlr.118.3.forensic
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
THE POLITICS OF PRIVACY IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, AND STATUTORY LAW ENFORCEMENT EXEMPTIONS.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2013, v. 111, n. 4, p. 485
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
THE MOSAIC THEORY OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2012, v. 111, n. 3, p. 311
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
Vitek v. Jones: Transfer of Prisoners to Mental Institutions.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Law & Medicine, 1982, v. 8, n. 2, p. 175, doi. 10.1017/s0098858800012739
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
ANTIDISCRIMINATION AND TAX EXEMPTION.
- Published in:
- Cornell Law Review, 2022, v. 107, n. 5, p. 1381
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
"TO BE READ TOGETHER": TAXONOMIZING COMPANION CASES OF LANDMARK SUPREME COURT DECISIONS.
- Published in:
- New York University Law Review, 2022, v. 97, n. 4, p. 1265
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
A Diachronic Approach to Bob Jones: Religious Tax Exemptions After Obergefell.
- Published in:
- Indiana Law Journal, 2017, v. 92, n. 3, p. 1175
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
Police GPS Surveillance on Vehicles and the Warrant Requirement: “<i>For a While I’ve Been Watching You Steady”</i>.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2013, v. 38, n. 4, p. 535, doi. 10.1007/s12103-012-9185-z
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
Trespass and Deception.
- Published in:
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2015, v. 2015, n. 2, p. 359
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
ON THE BROADNESS OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- SMU Law Review, 2021, v. 74, n. 1, p. 3
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article