Works matching DE "RIGHT to counsel"
2
- Michigan Law Review, 2018, v. 116, n. 8, p. 1465, doi. 10.36644/mlr.116.8.its.not
- Article
3
- Michigan Law Review, 2017, v. 116, n. 1, p. 75, doi. 10.36644/mlr.116.1.federal
- Article
4
- Michigan Law Review, 2014, v. 113, n. 2, p. 279
- Article
5
- Michigan Law Review, 2013, v. 111, n. 8, p. 1513
- Article
6
- Michigan Law Review, 2013, v. 111, n. 7, p. 1337
- Article
7
- Michigan Law Review, 2013, v. 111, n. 4, p. 617
- Article
8
- Michigan Law Review, 2012, v. 110, n. 6, p. 875
- Article
9
- ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2013, v. 20, n. 1, p. 85
- Article
10
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2012, v. 36, n. 3, p. 395
- Article
11
- Boston University Law Review, 2017, v. 97, n. 3, p. 1085
- Article
12
- Boston University Law Review, 2017, v. 97, n. 3, p. 993
- Article
13
- Boston University Law Review, 2017, v. 97, n. 3, p. 1293
- Article
14
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 5, p. 1651
- Article
15
- Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights, 2021, v. 27, n. 1, p. 25
- Article
16
- Emory Law Journal, 2024, v. 73, n. 4, p. 1015
- Article
17
- Emory Law Journal, 2023, v. 72, n. 4, p. 911
- Article
18
- New York Law School Law Review, 2015, v. 60, n. 3/4, p. 631
- Article
19
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2011, v. 14, n. 2, p. 537
- Article
20
- University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2011, v. 13, n. 4, p. 1079
- Article
21
- Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 2022, v. 73, n. 4, p. 5, doi. 10.1111/jfcj.12226
- Article
22
- Forensic Examiner, 2013, v. 22, n. 2, p. 55
- Article
23
- Albany Law Review, 2021, v. 85, n. 4, p. 201
- Duffy, Colleen D.;
- Gray, Melany
- Article
24
- Albany Law Review, 2017, v. 81, n. 4, p. 1395
- Article
25
- South Dakota Law Review, 2023, v. 68, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
26
- South Dakota Law Review, 2011, v. 56, n. 2, p. 238
- Article
27
- William & Mary Law Review, 2021, v. 62, n. 3, p. 999
- Article
28
- William & Mary Law Review, 2017, v. 58, n. 4, p. 1171
- Article
29
- William & Mary Law Review, 2012, v. 53, n. 3, p. 1039
- Article
30
- William & Mary Law Review, 2003, v. 45, n. 2, p. 782
- Article
31
- Law & Society Review, 2009, v. 43, n. 1, p. 187, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00363.x
- Davies, Andrew Lucas Blaize;
- Worden, Alissa Pollitz
- Article
32
- Golden Gate University Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 1, p. 5
- Article
33
- Golden Gate University Law Review, 2011, v. 42, n. 1, p. 77
- Article
34
- Denver Law Review, 2019, v. 96, n. 3, p. 733
- Article
35
- Denver Law Review, 2017, v. 94, n. 3, p. 537
- Article
36
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2016, v. 41, n. 1, p. 90, doi. 10.1353/sch.2016.0024
- Article
37
- California Law Review, 1983, v. 71, n. 5, p. 1516, doi. 10.2307/3480149
- Article
38
- California Law Review, 1983, v. 71, n. 4, p. 1348, doi. 10.2307/3480204
- Article
39
- California Law Review, 1981, v. 69, n. 6, p. 1734, doi. 10.2307/3480257
- Article
40
- Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 2011, v. 3, n. 2/3, p. 27
- Hakan Can;
- Frantzen, Durant
- Article
41
- American Journal of Legal History, 2023, v. 63, n. 4, p. 339, doi. 10.1093/ajlh/njad024
- Article
42
- JQ: Justice Quarterly, 2010, v. 27, n. 5, p. 713, doi. 10.1080/07418820903292292
- Feld, BarryC.;
- Schaefer, Shelly
- Article
43
- Bifocal, 2021, v. 42, n. 4, p. 1
- Pollock, John;
- Rusciano, Megan
- Article
44
- Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 2018, v. 17, n. 2, p. 411
- ZHIYUAN GUO;
- FEENEY, FLOYD
- Article
46
- Washburn Law Journal, 2012, v. 52, n. 1, p. 147
- Article
47
- Vermont Law Review, 2018, v. 42, n. 3, p. 441
- Article
48
- Vermont Law Review, 2016, v. 41, n. 2, p. 279
- Plummer, Caitlin M.;
- Syed, Imran J.
- Article
49
- Vermont Law Review, 2009, v. 34, n. 1, p. 173
- Article
50
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2024, v. 55, n. 2, p. 339
- Article