Works matching Equal protection clause and the Supreme Court
1
- Creighton Law Review, 2024, v. 57, n. 2, p. 189
- Article
2
- Rutgers Law Journal, 2014, v. 44, n. 4, p. 681
- Article
3
- California Legal History, 2014, v. 9, p. 203
- Article
4
- Washington Law Review, 2012, v. 87, n. 1, p. 331
- Zellers, P. Andrew Rorholm
- Article
5
- Iowa Law Review, 2010, v. 95, n. 5, p. 1731
- Article
6
- Stanford Law Review, 2017, v. 69, n. 5, p. 1237
- Article
7
- Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights, 2002, v. 7, n. 2, p. 141
- Green, Preston C.;
- Baker, Bruce D.
- Article
8
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2025, v. 50, n. 2, p. 154, doi. 10.1353/sch.2025.a964146
- Article
9
- Society, 1986, v. 24, n. 1, p. 24, doi. 10.1007/BF02695933
- Article
10
- Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2022, v. 43, n. 1, p. 67
- SIEGEL, REVA B.;
- MAYERI, SERENA;
- MURRAY, MELISSA
- Article
11
- Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 2013, p. 41
- Article
12
- Michigan State International Law Review, 2021, v. 29, n. 1, p. 77
- Article
13
- Developments in Mental Health Law, 2012, v. 31, n. 2, p. 1
- Article
14
- SMU Law Review, 2024, v. 77, n. 1, p. 93, doi. 10.25172/smulr.77.1.5
- Article
15
- Alabama Law Review, 2016, v. 67, n. 2, p. 365
- Article
16
- Alabama Law Review, 2015, v. 66, n. 3, p. 507
- Article
17
- Alabama Law Review, 2013, v. 64, n. 5, p. 1175
- Article
18
- Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica, 2021, v. 67, n. 1, p. 7, doi. 10.14712/23366478.2021.1
- Article
19
- American Economic Review, 1978, v. 68, n. 1, p. 107
- Article
20
- UMKC Law Review, 2019, v. 88, n. 1, p. 181
- Article
21
- UMKC Law Review, 2017, v. 86, n. 2, p. 405
- Article
22
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2025, v. 2025, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.59015/wlr.TBFG3964
- Article
23
- Journal of Law & Politics, 2017, v. 33, n. 1, p. 1
- Chambers, Christopher P.;
- Miller, Alan D.;
- Sobel, Joel
- Article
24
- Maryland Law Review, 2015, v. 75, n. 1, p. 247
- Article
25
- Urban Lawyer, 2015, v. 47, n. 1, p. 1
- Wasserman, Lewis M;
- Connolly, John P;
- Steen, Pamela L
- Article
26
- Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 2016, v. 30, n. 2, p. 273
- FORSYTHE, CLARKE D.;
- ARAGO, KEITH
- Article
27
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2018, v. 42, n. 3, p. 451
- Article
28
- Columbia Journal of Law & Social Problems, 2005, v. 38, n. 4, p. 443
- Article
29
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2008, v. 13, n. 1, p. 105
- Article
30
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2021, v. 52, n. 2, p. 353
- Article
31
- University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 2024, v. 86, n. 2, p. 405, doi. 10.5195/lawreview.2024.1064
- Article
32
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2024, v. 54, n. 5, p. 1419, doi. 10.60095/yheg7803
- Article
33
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2013, v. 43, n. 4, p. 199
- Article
34
- Houston Law Review, 2017, v. 54, n. 3, p. 569
- Article
35
- Houston Law Review, 2015, v. 53, n. 2, p. 595
- Article
36
- American Bar Association Journal, 1982, v. 68, n. 8, p. 1000
- Article
37
- American Bar Association Journal, 1978, v. 64, n. 12, p. 1911
- Article
38
- Washington Law Review, 2017, v. 92, n. 3, p. 1119
- Article
39
- Marquette Law Review, 2019, v. 102, n. 3, p. 979
- Article
40
- California Law Review, 2013, v. 101, n. 6, p. 1565
- Article
41
- Columbia Journal of Race & Law, 2021, v. 11, n. 1, p. 195
- Article
42
- St. Louis University Law Journal, 2018, v. 62, n. 3, p. 603
- Article
43
- Regent University Law Review, 2023, v. 36, n. 1, p. 59
- Article
44
- Ateneo Law Journal, 2011, v. 56, n. 1, p. 166
- Castolo, Camilk Maria L.;
- Tongco, Candice Christine O.
- Article
45
- Iowa Law Review, 2008, v. 93, n. 4, p. 1423
- Article
46
- Tennessee Law Review, 2022, v. 89, n. 2, p. 483
- Article
47
- Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2023, v. 20, n. 3, p. 609, doi. 10.1111/jels.12357
- Effenberger, Anna;
- Blume, John H.;
- Wells, Martin T.
- Article
49
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2004, v. 55, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
50
- California Law Review, 1949, v. 37, n. 3, p. 341, doi. 10.2307/3477801
- Tussman, Joseph;
- tenBroek, Jacobus
- Article