The Offence of Abetment Liable to Capital Punishment under the Islamic Criminal Law and the Pakistan Penal Code.
- Published in:
- Al-Azhaar Research Journal, 2022, v. 8, n. 1, p. 101, doi. 10.46896/alazhr.v8i01.353
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching Capital punishment laws
Results: 324
1
2
THE ECONOMIES OF SHOOTOUTS: DOES THE PASSAGE OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT LAWS PROTECT OF ENDANGER PUBLIC OFFICERS?
- Published in:
- Albany Law Review, 2002, v. 65, n. 4, p. 1051
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Adam and Lucifer: a Royal Example.
- Published in:
- Law & Literature, 2013, v. 25, n. 3, p. 466, doi. 10.1525/lal.2013.25.3.466
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
William Hogarth and Eighteenth Century English Law Relating to Capital Punishment: Symposium on the Art of Execution.
- Published in:
- Law & Literature, 2003, v. 15, n. 2, p. 267, doi. 10.1525/lal.2003.15.2.267
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Is There a Remedy for the Irrelevance of Academic Criminal Law?
- Published in:
- Journal of Legal Education, 2014, v. 64, n. 1, p. 5
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
THE TRUTH HURTS : A RESPONSE TO GEORGE BRAUCHLER AND RICH ORMAN.
- Published in:
- Denver Law Review, 2017, v. 94, n. 2, p. 363
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
THE TRUTH HURTS: A RESPONSE TO GEORGE BRAUCHLER AND RICH ORMAN.
- Published in:
- Denver Law Review, 2017, v. 94, n. 2, p. 363
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
Capital Punishment: Criminal Law and Social Evolution (Book ).
- Published in:
- 1985
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
9
LESSONS FOR LAW REFORM FROM THE AMERICAN EXPERIMENT WITH CAPITAL PUNISHMENT.
- Published in:
- Southern California Law Review, 2014, v. 87, n. 3, p. 733
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
RETENTION AND REFORM IN JAPANESE CAPITAL PUNISHMENT.
- Published in:
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 2016, v. 49, n. 4, p. 853
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
THE FALLACY OF EXECUTING TERRORISTS.
- Published in:
- Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2016, v. 26, n. 1, p. 66
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Death Delayed Is Retribution Denied.
- Published in:
- Minnesota Law Review, 2014, v. 99, n. 2/3, p. 421
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
When the Islamic State Kills: Ironies of American and ISIS Executions.
- Published in:
- Critical Criminology, 2022, v. 30, n. 4, p. 947, doi. 10.1007/s10612-022-09638-9
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Austin Sarat, Review of the Killing State: Capital Punishment in Law, Politics, and Culture.
- Published in:
- 2001
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
15
Contextualising Islamic Criminal Law: An Analysis of Al-Azhar Scholars' Contributions.
- Published in:
- Manchester Journal of Transnational Islamic Law & Practice, 2023, v. 19, n. 2, p. 20
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Death is Different: Studies in the Morality, Law, and Politics of Capital Punishment.
- Published in:
- 1989
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
17
Reply to Susan Bandes.
- Published in:
- 2016
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
18
DUTY & THE DEATH PENALTY.
- Published in:
- 2015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
19
IS DIYA A FORM OF CLEMENCY?
- Published in:
- Boston University International Law Journal, 2016, v. 34, n. 1, p. 149
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
Eleven Years of Lethal Injection Challenges in Arkansas.
- Published in:
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2017, v. 70, n. 2, p. 409
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
Capital Punishment: The Great American Paradox.
- Published in:
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2017, v. 70, n. 2, p. 369
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Should Death Be So Different?: Sentencing Purposes and Capital Jury Decisions in an Era of Smart on Crime Sentencing Reform.
- Published in:
- Arkansas Law Review (1968-present), 2017, v. 70, n. 2, p. 227
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
The Killing State: Capital Punishment in Law, Politics, and Culture (Book).
- Published in:
- 2000
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
24
JESUS E O DIVÓRCIO: O SIGNIFICADO DO TERMO GREGO "PORNEIA" EM MATEUS 5.32 E 19.9.
- Published in:
- Revista Batista Pioneira, 2019, v. 8, n. 2, p. 405
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
WHAT I THINK ABOUT WHEN I THINK ABOUT THE DEATH PENALTY.
- Published in:
- St. Louis University Law Journal, 2018, v. 62, n. 4, p. 781
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
LIFE AFTER SENTENCE OF DEATH: WHAT BECOMES OF INDIVIDUALS UNDER SENTENCE OF DEATH AFTER CAPITAL PUNISHMENT LEGISLATION IS REPEALED OR INVALIDATED.
- Published in:
- Akron Law Review, 2021, v. 54, n. 2, p. 267
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
THE DEATH PENALTY AND JUSTICE SCALIA'S LINES.
- Published in:
- Akron Law Review, 2017, v. 50, n. 2, p. 203
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
Capital Punishment, International Law, and Human Rights.
- Published in:
- International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 2019, v. 14, n. 2, p. 298, doi. 10.5281/zenodo.3723480
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
Solitary Confinement Until Death by State-Sponsored Homicide: An Eighth Amendment Assessment of the Modern Execution Process.
- Published in:
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2016, v. 73, n. 3, p. 1213
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
THE PRESENT AND FUTURE: THE DEATH PENALTY IN CHINA'S PENAL CODE.
- Published in:
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2011, v. 36, n. 2, p. 427
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
American Bar Association Supplementary Guidelines for the Mitigation Function of Defense Teams in Death Penalty Cases: Implications for Social Work.
- Published in:
- Social Work, 2012, v. 57, n. 2, p. 155, doi. 10.1093/sw/sws033
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
POSSIBLE RELIANCE: PROTECTING LEGALLY INNOCENT JOHNSON CLAIMANTS.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2020, v. 119, n. 2, p. 425, doi. 10.36644/mlr.119.2.possible
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
The limits of legal language: Decisionmaking in capital cases.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 1996, v. 94, n. 8, p. 2590, doi. 10.2307/1289834
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
Dementia and the Death Penalty.
- Published in:
- Hastings Center Report, 2019, v. 49, n. 6, p. 6, doi. 10.1002/hast.1061
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
A DECENT PROPOSAL: EXEMPTING EIGHTEEN- TO TWENTY-YEAR-OLDS FROM THE DEATH PENALTY.
- Published in:
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2016, v. 40, n. 2, p. 139
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
NORTH CAROLINA'S FAILURE TO PERFORM COMPARATIVE PROPORTIONALITY REVIEW: VIOLATING THE EIGHTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS BY ALLOWING THE ARBITRARY AND DISCRIMINATORY APPLICATION OF THE DEATH PENALTY.
- Published in:
- Review of Law & Social Change, 2015, v. 39, n. 4, p. 419
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
Shifting Diagnostic Systems for Defining Intellectual Disability in Death Penalty Cases: Hall vs. Florida.
- Published in:
- 2015
- By:
- Publication type:
- Letter
38
A Value-Critical Policy Analysis of Georgia's Beyond a Reasonable Doubt Standard of Proof of Intellectual Disability.
- Published in:
- Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 2019, v. 30, n. 1, p. 56, doi. 10.1177/1044207319828404
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
THE SUPPLY-SIDE ATTACK ON LETHAL INJECTION AND THE RISE OF EXECUTION SECRECY.
- Published in:
- Boston University Law Review, 2015, v. 95, n. 2, p. 427
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
40
ACCRUAL AND UNUSUAL? CALIBRATING THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON SECTION 1983 METHOD-OF-EXECUTION CHALLENGES.
- Published in:
- Emory Law Journal, 2012, v. 62, n. 2, p. 407
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT NOT TO KILL.
- Published in:
- Emory Law Journal, 2012, v. 62, n. 1, p. 121
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
INCONSISTENT RATIONALES FOR CAPITAL PUNISHMENT PLUS.
- Published in:
- University of Illinois Law Review, 2017, v. 2017, n. 4, p. 1363
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
THE NEEDLE LIVES TO SEE ANOTHER DAY! THREE-DRUG PROTOCOL RULED CONSTITUTIONAL IN GLOSSIP V. GROSS.
- Published in:
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2017, v. 51, n. 3, p. 881
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
ABOLISHING THE AMERICAN DEATH PENALTY: THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION VERSUS THE U.S. SUPREME COURT.
- Published in:
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2017, v. 51, n. 3, p. 579
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
A CONTEMPORARY REVIEW OF DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN AMERICA.
- Published in:
- Forensic Examiner, 2003, v. 12, n. 5/6, p. 36
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
Is electrocution an unconstitutional method of execution? the...
- Published in:
- William & Mary Law Review, 1994, v. 35, n. 2, p. 551
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
DEAR INMATE.
- Published in:
- Diagram, 2014, v. 14, n. 6, p. 4
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM: THE PRESENT MOMENT.
- Published in:
- Wisconsin Law Review, 2015, v. 2015, n. 2, p. 181
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
Cruel and Unusual: The American Death Penalty and the Founders' Eighth Amendment. By John D. Bessler.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
50
'I'll Make Them Shoot Me': Accounts of Death Row Prisoners Advocating for Execution.
- Published in:
- Law & Society Review, 2012, v. 46, n. 3, p. 589, doi. 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00507.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article