PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND DENIED: ARGUING FOR PRE-SERVICE REMOVAL UNDER THE PLAIN LANGUAGE OF THE FORUM-DEFENDANT RULE.Published in:Cleveland State Law Review, 2012, v. 60, n. 4, p. 907By:CURRY, MATTHEWPublication type:Article
THE MCCARRAN-FERGUSON ACT'S INTERSECTION WITH FOREIGN INSURANCE COMPANIES.Published in:Cleveland State Law Review, 2012, v. 60, n. 4, p. 883By:KRUPAR, ANGELA D.Publication type:Article
MONETARY RECOVERIES FOR STATE CRIME VICTIMS.Published in:Cleveland State Law Review, 2012, v. 60, n. 4, p. 819By:PARNESS, JEFFREY A.;LEE, LAURA;LAUBE, EDMUNDPublication type:Article
NEITHER REASONABLE NOR REMEDIAL: THE HOPELESS CONTRADICTIONS OF THE LEGAL ETHICS MEASURES TO PREVENT PERJURY.Published in:Cleveland State Law Review, 2012, v. 60, n. 4, p. 781By:THROWER, SUSAN E.Publication type:Article
THE POLICE-PROSECUTOR RELATIONSHIP AND THE NO-CONTACT RULE: CONFLICTING INCENTIVES AFTER MONTEJO V. LOUISIANA AND MARYLAND V. SHATZER.Published in:Cleveland State Law Review, 2012, v. 60, n. 4, p. 747By:MASON, CALEBPublication type:Article