Works matching Peremptory challenges (Jury selection)
1
- FIU Law Review, 2022, v. 16, n. 3, p. 781, doi. 10.25148/lawrev.16.3.10
- Article
2
- Judges' Journal, 2022, v. 61, n. 2, p. 24
- Article
3
- Judges' Journal, 2022, v. 61, n. 2, p. 19
- Article
4
- California Law Review, 2020, v. 108, n. 1, p. 233, doi. 10.15779/Z385Q4RM61
- Article
5
- California Law Review, 2018, v. 106, n. 6, p. 2067, doi. 10.15779/Z38PC2T88P
- Article
6
- Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2024, v. 98, n. 1, p. 67
- Article
7
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2024, v. 77, n. 5, p. 1529
- Article
8
- Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties, 2011, v. 7, n. 2, p. 293
- Article
9
- Oregon Law Review, 2024, v. 102, n. 2, p. 355
- GRAFFY, COLLEEN P.;
- CALDWELL, HARRY M.;
- SOOD, GAUTAM K.
- Article
10
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2014, v. 104, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
11
- Indiana Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 1, p. 313
- Article
12
- Yale Law Journal, 2019, v. 128, n. 8, p. 2356
- Article
13
- Yale Law Journal, 2016, v. 125, n. 8, p. 2535
- Article
14
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 3, p. 1006
- Article
15
- Columbia Law Review, 2024, v. 124, n. 1, p. 1
- Frampton, Thomas Ward;
- Osowski, Brandon Charles
- Article
16
- Columbia Law Review, 2018, v. 118, n. 3, p. 713
- Article
17
- Columbia Law Review, 2016, v. 116, n. 1, p. 195
- Article
18
- Southern California Law Review, 2024, v. 97, n. 1, p. 253
- Article
19
- George Washington Law Review, 2016, v. 84, n. 4, p. 1075
- Article
20
- California Law Review, 2012, v. 100, n. 3, p. 635
- Article
21
- Florida Bar Journal, 2023, v. 97, n. 6, p. 12
- REITER, JACK;
- FELDMAN, SYDNEY
- Article
22
- Florida Bar Journal, 2023, v. 97, n. 6, p. 9
- Reiter, Jack;
- Feldman, Sydney
- Article
23
- Florida Bar Journal, 2020, v. 94, n. 6, p. 30
- Article
24
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2010, v. 45, n. 1, p. 307
- Article
25
- Yale Law & Policy Review, 2016, v. 34, n. 2, p. 387
- Article
26
- Valahia University Law Study, 2017, v. 29, p. 440
- Article
27
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2021, v. 111, n. 1, p. 275
- Article
28
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2017, v. 107, n. 4, p. 687
- O'BRIEN, BARBARA;
- GROSSO, CATHERINE M.;
- TAYLOR, ABIJAH P.
- Article
29
- Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2007, v. 20, n. 5, p. 467, doi. 10.1002/bdm.571
- Norton, Michael I.;
- Sommers, Samuel R.;
- Brauner, Sara
- Article
30
- Kansas Law Review, 2021, v. 70, n. 2, p. 361
- Article
31
- Iowa Law Review, 2015, v. 100, n. 4, p. 1383
- Article
33
- Iowa Law Review, 2012, v. 97, n. 5, p. 1613
- Article
34
- Iowa Law Review, 2012, v. 97, n. 5, p. 1585
- Article
35
- Iowa Law Review, 2012, v. 97, n. 5, p. 1561
- Article
36
- Iowa Law Review, 2012, v. 97, n. 5, p. 1531
- Grosso, Catherine M.;
- O'Brien, Barbara
- Article
37
- Iowa Law Review, 2012, v. 97, n. 5, p. 1467
- Article
38
- Minnesota Law Review, 2022, v. 106, n. 5, p. 2173
- Article
39
- Minnesota Law Review, 2013, v. 98, n. 2, p. 592
- Article
40
- Minnesota Law Review, 2012, v. 96, n. 3, p. 1100
- Article
41
- William & Mary Law Review, 2020, v. 61, n. 6, p. 1759
- Article
42
- William & Mary Law Review, 2015, v. 56, n. 5, p. 1859
- Article
43
- Indiana Law Journal, 2017, v. 92, n. 2, p. 599
- Article
44
- Chicago-Kent Law Review, 2024, v. 98, n. 1, p. 111
- O'BRIEN, BARBARA;
- GROSSO, CATHERINE M.
- Article
45
- Boston University Public Interest Law Journal, 2010, v. 19, n. 2, p. 193
- Article
46
- Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties, 2011, v. 7, n. 1, p. 47
- Article
47
- St. Mary's Law Journal, 2018, v. 49, n. 3, p. 665
- Article
48
- Campbell Law Review, 2021, v. 44, n. 1, p. 3
- Article
49
- Alabama Law Review, 2022, v. 73, n. 4, p. 753
- Article
50
- American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 2016, v. 39, n. 3, p. 481
- Article