Works matching DE "COPYRIGHT of performing rights"
1
- Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2017, v. 22, n. 4, p. I, doi. 10.1111/jcc4.12170
- Article
2
- Modern Language Journal (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 2019, v. 103, n. 2, p. 547, doi. 10.1111/modl.12483
- Article
3
- Journal of Emerging Knowledge on Emerging Markets (JEKEM), 2011, v. 3, p. 1
- Kemp, Elyria;
- Natesan, Chinna;
- Borders, Leila
- Article
4
- Contemporary Music Review, 2005, v. 24, n. 6, p. 483, doi. 10.1080/07494460500296151
- Article
5
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2011, v. 35, p. 445
- Article
6
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2015, v. 17, n. 3, p. 815
- Article
7
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2012, v. 14, n. 4, p. 797
- Article
8
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 2011, v. 13, n. 4, p. 739
- Article
9
- North Carolina Law Review, 2019, v. 97, n. 3, p. 734
- Article
10
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2016, v. 31, p. 725, doi. 10.15779/Z38QG47
- Article
11
- Actualidad Jurídica (1578-956X), 2012, n. 31, p. 90
- Fernández De Córdoba, Álvaro Bourkaib
- Article
12
- Journal of Cultural Economics, 2010, v. 34, n. 3, p. 219, doi. 10.1007/s10824-010-9123-1
- Article
13
- New York University Law Review, 2014, v. 89, n. 4, p. 1117
- Article
14
- Harvard Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law, 2011, v. 2, n. 2, p. 221
- Article
15
- Parliamentarian, 2012, v. 93, n. 3, p. 213
- Article
16
- Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, 2014, v. 17, p. 353
- Article
17
- University of Miami Law Review, 2013, v. 67, n. 3, p. 661
- Article
18
- Cardozo Law Review, 2011, v. 32, n. 4, p. 1515
- Article
19
- Texas Law Review, 2015, v. 93, n. 3, p. 743
- Article
21
- Temple International & Comparative Law Journal, 2016, v. 30, n. 2, p. 225
- Article
22
- Journal of International Women's Studies, 2013, v. 14, n. 4, p. 95
- Article
23
- Contemporary Pediatrics, 2007, v. 24, n. 5, p. 112
- Article
24
- University of Chicago Law Review, 2017, v. 84, n. 3, p. 1517
- Article
25
- European Competition & Regulatory Law Review, 2017, v. 1, n. 4, p. 306, doi. 10.21552/core/2017/4/6
- Article
26
- Georgia Law Review, 2015, v. 49, n. 3, p. 819
- Article
27
- George Mason Law Review, 2015, v. 22, n. 4, p. 943
- Article
28
- George Mason Law Review, 2015, v. 22, n. 4, p. 925
- Article
29
- Management Review, 1993, v. 82, n. 11, p. 7
- Article
30
- TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 2009, v. 53, n. 5, p. 8, doi. 10.1007/s11528-009-0314-6
- DuBoff, Leonard D.;
- King, Christy O.
- Article
31
- International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 2021, v. 35, n. 3, p. 222, doi. 10.1080/13600869.2020.1820684
- Kariyawasam, Kanchana;
- Palliyaarachchi, Rangika
- Article
32
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2021, v. 28, n. 2, p. 365
- Article
33
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 2016, v. 23, n. 2, p. 357
- Article
34
- Oregon Law Review, 2010, v. 89, n. 2, p. 505
- Article
35
- Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1950, v. 36, n. 4, p. 500, doi. 10.1080/00335635009381601
- Article
36
- Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, 2011, v. 34, n. 4, p. 631
- Article
39
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal, 2018, v. 16, n. 2, p. 1
- Article
40
- Canadian Theatre Review, 1998, n. 97, p. 48, doi. 10.3138/ctr.97.009
- Article
41
- Washington & Lee Law Review, 2014, v. 71, n. 4, p. 2557
- Article