UNITED STATES V. JONES: DOES KATZ STILL HAVE NINE LIVES?
- Published in:
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2012, v. 24, n. 2, p. 101
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching United States v. Jones
Results: 163
1
2
NEW AGE TRACKING TECHNOLOGIES IN THE POST-UNITED STATES V. JONES ENVIRONMENT: THE NEED FOR MODEL LEGISLATION.
- Published in:
- Creighton Law Review, 2015, v. 48, n. 3, p. 553
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
THE EVOLVING FOURTH AMENDMENT: UNITED STATES v. JONES, THE INFORMATION CLOUD, AND THE RIGHT TO EXCLUDE.
- Published in:
- Maryland Law Review, 2013, v. 72, n. 3, p. 997
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
MAKING THE MOST OF UNITED STATES V. JONES IN A SURVEILLANCE SOCIETY: A STATUTORY IMPLEMENTATION OF MOSAIC THEORY.
- Published in:
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy, 2012, v. 8, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
The Good-Faith Exception and Unsettled Law: A Study of GPS Tracking Cases After United States v. Jones.
- Published in:
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2013, v. 74, n. 5, p. 807
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Sentenced for a `crime' the government did not prove: Jones v. United States and the...
- Published in:
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1998, v. 61, n. 4, p. 249, doi. 10.2307/1192438
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
It's Raining Katz and Jones: The Implications of United States v. Jones--A Case of Sound and Fury.
- Published in:
- Pace Law Review, 2013, v. 33, n. 2, p. 683, doi. 10.58948/2331-3528.1832
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
UNITED STATES V. JONES: THE FOOLISH REVIVAL OF THE "TRESPASS DOCTRINE" IN ADDRESSING GPS TECHNOLOGY AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- 2013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Opinion
9
ADVENTURES ON THE AUTOBAHN AND INFOBAHN: UNITED STATES V. JONES, MANDATORY DATA RETENTION, AND A MORE REASONABLE "REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY".
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2013, v. 103, n. 3, p. 985
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
REAL-TIME AND HISTORIC LOCATION SURVEILLANCE AFTER UNITED STATES V. JONES: AN ADMINISTRABLE, MILDLY MOSAIC APPROACH.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2013, v. 103, n. 3, p. 803
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
UNITED STATES V. JONES: BIG BROTHER AND THE "COMMON GOOD" VERSUS THE FOURTH AMENDMENT AND YOUR RIGHT TO PRIVACY.
- Published in:
- Tennessee Journal of Law & Policy, 2013, v. 9, n. 1, p. 7
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
The "Big Brother" Effect: The Implications of the Unanswered Question in United States v. Jones.
- Published in:
- University of the Pacific Law Review, 2017, v. 48, n. 2, p. 395
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
UNITED STATES V. JONES: THE (HOPEFULLY TEMPORARY) DERAILMENT OF CELL-SITE LOCATION INFORMATION PROTECTION.
- Published in:
- Loyola Journal of Public Interest Law, 2013, v. 15, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
GPS TRACKING OUT OF FOURTH AMENDMENT DEAD ENDS: UNITED STATES V. JONES AND THE KATZ CONUNDRUM.
- Published in:
- North Carolina Law Review, 2012, v. 91, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Prying Eyes: How Government Access to Third-Party Tracking Data May Be Impacted by United States v. Jones.
- Published in:
- New England Law Review, 2012, v. 46, n. 4, p. 843
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
LOOKING FORWARD BY LOOKING BACKWARD: UNITED STATES V. JONES PREDICTS FOURTH AMENDMENT PROPERTY RIGHTS PROTECTIONS IN E-MAIL.
- Published in:
- George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal, 2014, v. 24, n. 3, p. 349
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
United States v. Jones: Fourth Amendment Applicability in the 21st Century.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
18
FIGHTING CYBERCRIME AFTER UNITED STATES V. JONES.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2013, v. 103, n. 3, p. 745
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
REFLECTIONS ON PRAGMATIC JURISPRUDENCE: A CASE STUDY OF BOB JONES UNIVERSITY V. UNITED STATES.
- Published in:
- American Business Law Journal, 1984, v. 22, n. 2, p. 227, doi. 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1984.tb00791.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
FROM JONES TO JONES: FIFTEEN YEARS OF INCOHERENCE IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF SENTENCING FACTFINDING.
- Published in:
- University of Toledo Law Review, 2016, v. 47, n. 2, p. 413
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
A Tribute to Justice Scalia.
- Published in:
- Yale Law Journal, 2017, v. 126, n. 6, p. 1609
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Privacy in Public.
- Published in:
- 2014
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
23
Escaping Fourth Amendment Doctrine After Jones: Physics, Law, and Privacy Protection.
- Published in:
- Cato Supreme Court Review, 2011, p. 219
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
United States v. Batista.
- Published in:
- New York Law School Law Review, 2014, v. 59, n. 4, p. 761
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
Vehicular GPS Surveillance: The Death of Autonomy and Anonymity or a Variation on the Status Quo?
- Published in:
- Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 2012, v. 39, p. 337
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
SHOUTING DOWN THE WELL: HUMAN OBSERVATION AS A NECESSARY CONDITION OF PRIVACY BREACH, AND WHY WARRANTS SHOULD ATTACH TO DATA ACCESS, NOT DATA GATHERING.
- Published in:
- New York University Annual Survey of American Law, 2015, v. 70, n. 3, p. 323
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
27
THE POLITICS OF PRIVACY IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, AND STATUTORY LAW ENFORCEMENT EXEMPTIONS.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2013, v. 111, n. 4, p. 485
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
28
THE MOSAIC THEORY OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- Michigan Law Review, 2012, v. 111, n. 3, p. 311
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
29
Privacy Is the Problem: United States v. Maynard and a Case for a New Regulatory Model for Police Surveillance.
- Published in:
- George Washington Law Review, 2012, v. 80, n. 4, p. 1209
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
30
Sexually Conservative Religious Universities and Tax Exemption.
- Published in:
- Journal of Church & State, 2017, v. 59, n. 4, p. 566, doi. 10.1093/jcs/csw049
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
31
Drones and Jones: The Fourth Amendment and Police Discretion in the Digital Age.
- Published in:
- California Law Review, 2014, v. 102, n. 3, p. 729
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
32
THE SEXUAL INTEGRITY OF RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS AND TAX EXEMPTION.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2017, v. 40, n. 2, p. 255
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
33
LOOKING BACK TO LOOK FORWARD: REEXAMINING THE APPLICATION OF THE THIRD-PARTY DOCTRINE TO CONVEYED PAPERS.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2014, v. 37, n. 1, p. 329
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
34
OBSERVATIONS FROM ABOVE: UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS AND PRIVACY.
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2013, v. 36, n. 2, p. 457
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
35
MACHINEGUNNING REASON: SENTENCING FACTORS AND MANDATORY MINIMUMS IN United States v. O'Brien, 130 S. CT. 2169 (2010).
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2011, v. 34, n. 3, p. 1131
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
36
Police GPS Surveillance on Vehicles and the Warrant Requirement: “<i>For a While I’ve Been Watching You Steady”</i>.
- Published in:
- American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2013, v. 38, n. 4, p. 535, doi. 10.1007/s12103-012-9185-z
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
37
ORDER, TECHNOLOGY, AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANINGS OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2013, v. 103, n. 3, p. 685
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
38
SYMPOSIUM ON CYBERCRIME.
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2013, v. 103, n. 3, p. 663
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
39
VALUE DEMOCRACY AS THE BASIS FOR VIEWPOINT NEUTRALITY: A THEORY OF FREE SPEECH AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE STATE SPEECH AND LIMITED PUBLIC FORUM DOCTRINES'.
- Published in:
- 2013
- By:
- Publication type:
- Essay
40
FUTURE OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT: THE PROBLEM WITH PRIVACY, POVERTY AND POLICING.
- Published in:
- University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender & Class, 2014, v. 14, n. 2, p. 240
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
41
FUTURE OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT: THE PROBLEM WITH PRIVACY, POVERTY AND POLICING.
- Published in:
- University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender & Class, 2014, v. 14, n. 2, p. 240
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
42
Restoring Reason to the Third Party Doctrine.
- Published in:
- Minnesota Law Review, 2016, v. 100, n. 3, p. 985
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
43
PRIVACY IN THE CLOUD: THE MOSAIC THEORY AND THE STORED COMMUNICATIONS ACT.
- Published in:
- Stanford Law Review, 2015, v. 67, n. 3, p. 677
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
44
A Diachronic Approach to Bob Jones: Religious Tax Exemptions After Obergefell.
- Published in:
- Indiana Law Journal, 2017, v. 92, n. 3, p. 1175
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
45
A Forgotten First: Everett J. Waring, First Black Supreme Court Advocate, and the Case of Jones v. United States.
- Published in:
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2022, v. 47, n. 3, p. 265, doi. 10.1353/sch.2022.a901693
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
46
SOCIAL NETWORKS, GOVERNMENT SURVEILLANCE, AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT MOSAIC THEORY.
- Published in:
- Boston University Law Review, 2014, v. 94, n. 6, p. 1809
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
47
GPS AND CELL PHONE TRACKING: A CONSTITUTIONAL AND EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS.
- Published in:
- University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2013, v. 82, n. 1, p. 207
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
48
IMPLICATIONS OF UNITED STATES V. JONES ON DNA COLLECTION FROM ARRESTEES: A TRESPASS PROHIBITED BY THE FOURTH AMENDMENT?
- Published in:
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2013, v. 25, n. 2, p. 244
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
49
SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY AND THE LOSS OF SOMETHING A LOT LIKE PRIVACY: AN EXAMINATION OF THE "MOSAIC THEORY" AND THE LIMITS OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2012, v. 24, n. 2, p. 169
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
50
Dear Readers.
- Published in:
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2012, v. 24, n. 2, p. 101
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article