Works matching DE "JUDICIAL criticism"
1
- Theory & Practice of Legislation, 2016, v. 4, n. 2, p. 107, doi. 10.1080/20508840.2016.1249679
- Article
2
- Valparaiso University Law Review, 2015, v. 50, n. 1, p. 7
- Article
3
- Denver Law Review, 2022, v. 99, n. 2, p. 361
- Article
4
- Journal of Judgments by the Court of Jurisdictional Disputes / Uyusmazlik Mahkemesi Dergisi, 2016, n. 7, p. 873
- Article
5
- Review of Constitutional Studies, 2016, v. 20, n. 2, p. 213
- Gélinas, Fabien;
- Brosseau, Jonathan
- Article
6
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2012, v. 37, n. 2, p. 157
- Article
7
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2021, v. 71, n. 3, p. 1045
- Article
8
- Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 2021, p. 155
- Article
9
- Journal of the Legal Profession, 2011, v. 36, n. 1, p. 139
- Article
10
- East European Yearbook on Human Rights, 2021, v. 4, n. 1, p. 25, doi. 10.5553/EEYHR/258977642021004001003
- Milašiūtė, Vygantė;
- Žalimienė, Skirgailė
- Article
11
- Valahia University Law Study, 2012, v. 20, n. 2, p. 33
- Article
12
- International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2023, v. 21, n. 1, p. 80, doi. 10.1093/icon/moad012
- Kosař, David;
- Šipulová, Katarína
- Article
13
- Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 2013, v. 54, n. 1, p. 40, doi. 10.1556/AJur.54.2013.1.4
- Article
14
- European Constitutional Law Review, 2022, v. 18, n. 4, p. 591, doi. 10.1017/S1574019622000347
- Article
15
- European Constitutional Law Review, 2022, v. 18, n. 4, p. 753, doi. 10.1017/S1574019622000335
- Leloup, Mathieu;
- Kosař, David
- Article
16
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2015, v. 163, n. 5, p. 1241
- BALGANESH, SHYAMKRISHNA;
- PARCHOMOVSKY, GIDEON
- Article
17
- New York University Law Review, 2019, v. 94, n. 5, p. 1057
- HECHT, HONORABLE NATHAN L.
- Article
18
- Melbourne University Law Review, 2012, v. 36, n. 2, p. 553
- TROTTER, ANDREW;
- GAROZZO, MATT
- Article
19
- Revista de Historia del Derecho, 2022, n. 64, p. 145
- Article