Works matching DE "LEGAL status of public officers"
1
- Modern Law Review, 2013, v. 76, n. 6, p. 1119, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12050
- Article
2
- California Law Review, 2017, v. 105, n. 2, p. 539, doi. 10.15779/Z38HX15Q49
- Article
3
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 1999, v. 3, n. 2, p. 403
- Duffield, Steven J.;
- Ho, James C.
- Article
4
- Public Sector, 2010, v. 33, n. 3, p. 24
- Article
5
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 2, p. 473
- Article
6
- Tulane European & Civil Law Forum, 2010, v. 25, n. 4, p. 139
- Article
7
- Denver Law Review, 2018, v. 96, n. 1, p. 177
- Article
8
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2022, v. 45, n. 3, p. 1057
- Article
9
- Business Law International, 2011, v. 12, n. 3, p. 257
- Dunst, Lee G.;
- Diamant, Michael S.;
- Kung, Teresa R.
- Article
10
- Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2012, v. 10, n. 5, p. 1303, doi. 10.1093/jicj/mqs063
- Article
11
- William & Mary Law Review, 2021, v. 62, n. 4, p. 1297
- LEIB, ETHAN J.;
- KENT, ANDREW
- Article
12
- William & Mary Law Review, 2015, v. 56, n. 4, p. 1029
- Article
13
- New Political Science (Duke University Press), 2020, v. 42, n. 3, p. 253, doi. 10.1080/07393148.2020.1807274
- Article
14
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2011, v. 61, n. 2, p. 551
- Article
15
- Conflict Resolution & Negotiation Journal, 2012, v. 2012, n. 3, p. 5
- Article
16
- LESIJ - Lex ET Scientia International Journal, 2017, v. 24, n. 1, p. 79
- Article
17
- Croatian Public Administration, 2010, v. 10, n. 1, p. 13
- Article
18
- Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 2014, v. 17, n. 4, p. 1631, doi. 10.4314/pelj.v17i4.12
- Article
19
- Iowa Law Review, 2019, v. 104, n. 4, p. 2055
- Article
20
- Iowa Law Review, 2016, v. 101, n. 2, p. 779
- Article
21
- Cornell Law Review, 2015, v. 100, n. 4, p. 901
- Article
22
- Cornell Law Review, 2015, v. 100, n. 4, p. 985
- Article
24
- Minnesota Law Review, 2010, v. 94, n. 4, p. 1202
- Beckstrom, Darryn Cathryn
- Article
25
- Denver University Law Review, 2012, v. 89, n. 3, p. 771
- Article
26
- Columbia Law Review, 2011, v. 111, n. 7, p. 1601
- Article
27
- National Lawyers Guild Review, 2010, v. 67, n. 3, p. 184
- Mirer, Jeanne;
- Cohn, Marjorie
- Article
28
- Journal der Juristischen Zeitgeschichte, 2015, v. 9, n. 1, p. 4, doi. 10.1515/jjzg-2015-0002
- Jiménez Díaz, Von María José
- Article
29
- McGeorge Law Review, 2013, v. 44, n. 3, p. 639
- Article
30
- Journal of Law / Magallat al-Huquq, 2015, v. 39, n. 3, p. 365
- الخلايلة, محمد علي;
- الطراونة, سهى أحمد
- Article
31
- Slovenian Law Review, 2007, v. 4, n. 1/2, p. 347
- Article
32
- Slovenian Law Review, 2007, v. 4, n. 1/2, p. 309
- Tepina, Polona;
- Žgur, Matija
- Article
33
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2011, v. 59, n. 3, p. 463
- Article
34
- Florida Bar Journal, 2000, v. 74, n. 6, p. 75
- Article
35
- Widener Law Journal, 2011, v. 20, n. 2, p. 497
- Article
36
- Juridical Tribune / Tribuna Juridica, 2013, v. 3, n. 2, p. 250
- Article
37
- Singapore Law Review, 2011, v. 29, p. 21
- Article
38
- Syracuse Law Review, 2014, v. 65, n. 1, p. 103
- Article
39
- Sydney Law Review, 2019, v. 41, n. 1, p. 131
- Article
40
- New York University Annual Survey of American Law, 2012, v. 68, n. 1, p. 125
- Article
41
- Tulane Law Review, 2021, v. 95, n. 3, p. 741
- Article
42
- Tennessee Bar Journal, 2016, v. 52, n. 2, p. 12
- Article
43
- Revista de Derecho Puertorriqueño, 2012, v. 52, n. 1, p. 23
- Caraballo Oquendo, Jarryson J.;
- Laboy, Fabiola Rivera
- Article
44
- George Washington Law Review, 2018, v. 86, n. 5, p. 1348
- Rothman, Richard;
- Shugart-Schmidt, Katelin
- Article
45
- George Washington Law Review, 2013, v. 82, n. 1, p. 247
- Article
46
- Journal of Law & Politics, 2024, v. 39, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
47
- Constitutional Commentary, 2021, v. 36, n. 1, p. 87
- Article
48
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2012, v. 32, n. 1, p. 51, doi. 10.1093/ojls/gqr018
- Article
49
- ABA Journal of Labor & Employment Law, 2014, v. 30, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
50
- Georgia Law Review, 2014, v. 48, n. 3, p. 843
- Article