Works matching Baker v. Carr
1
- Virginia Law Review, 2015, v. 101, n. 8, p. 2263
- Article
2
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2012, v. 62, n. 4, p. 1153
- Article
3
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2012, v. 62, n. 4, p. 947
- Article
4
- 2014
- Huefnert, Steven F.;
- Foley, Edward B.
- Essay
5
- Missouri Law Review, 2014, v. 79, n. 4, p. 871
- Article
6
- Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties, 2014, v. 10, n. 1, p. 27
- Article
7
- Cumberland Law Review, 2016, v. 46, n. 2, p. 377
- SPENCER, ANDREW;
- HUGHES, CHRISTOPHER;
- RICHIE, ROB
- Article
8
- Alabama Law Review, 2016, v. 67, n. 2, p. 485
- Charles, Guy-Uriel E.;
- Fuentes-Rohwer, Luis
- Article
9
- 2005
- Hasen, Richard L.;
- Schultz, David
- Book Review
10
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2016, v. 39, n. 2, p. 371
- Article
11
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2016, v. 77, n. 4, p. 763
- Article
12
- Ohio State Law Journal, 2016, v. 77, n. 4, p. 763
- Article
14
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2012, v. 62, n. 4, p. 1179
- Altman, Micah;
- McDonald, Michael P.
- Article
15
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2012, v. 62, n. 4, p. 1109
- Article
16
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2012, v. 62, n. 4, p. 1079
- Griffin, John D.;
- Newman, Brian
- Article
17
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2012, v. 62, n. 4, p. 969
- Tokaji, Daniel;
- Wolf, Owen
- Article
18
- Case Western Reserve Law Review, 2012, v. 62, n. 4, p. 941
- Article
19
- Journal of Law & Politics, 2014, v. 29, n. 3, p. 427
- Article
20
- Policy Studies Journal, 1981, v. 9, n. 6, p. 863, doi. 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb00991.x
- Article
21
- Policy Studies Journal, 1981, v. 9, n. 6, p. 825, doi. 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb00988.x
- Article
22
- Policy Studies Journal, 1981, v. 9, n. 6, p. 819, doi. 10.1111/1541-0072.ep11752106
- Grofman, Bernard;
- Scarrow, Howard
- Article
24
- Utah Law Review, 2014, v. 2014, n. 4, p. 897
- Article
25
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1962, v. 27, n. 2, p. 188, doi. 10.2307/1190543
- Article
26
- Washington International Law Journal, 2017, v. 26, n. 2, p. 349
- Po Liang Chen;
- Wada, Jordan T.
- Article
27
- California Law Review, 1963, v. 51, n. 3, p. 535, doi. 10.2307/3478969
- Article
28
- California Law Review, 1962, v. 50, n. 2, p. 245, doi. 10.2307/3479163
- Article
29
- Arkansas Law Notes, 2017, p. 1
- Article
30
- Constitutional Commentary, 2001, v. 18, n. 2, p. 359
- Article
31
- Jurisprudence (1802-3843), 2019, n. 1, p. 1
- Article
32
- Public Choice, 1993, v. 77, n. 3, p. 467, doi. 10.1007/BF01047856
- Article
34
- Journal of Supreme Court History, 2006, v. 31, n. 3, p. 279, doi. 10.1353/sch.2006.0004
- Article
35
- Harvard Journal on Legislation, 2009, v. 46, n. 1, p. 243
- Article
36
- U.C. Davis Law Review, 2013, v. 47, n. 1, p. 343
- Article
37
- Touro Law Review, 2024, v. 39, n. 3, p. 805
- Article
38
- Stanford Law Review, 2023, v. 75, n. 5, p. 1031
- Bradley, Curtis A.;
- Posner, Eric A.
- Article
39
- Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2016, v. 25, n. 3, p. 347
- Article
40
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 6, p. 1183
- Article
41
- Vanderbilt Law Review, 2017, v. 70, n. 4, p. 1183
- Article
42
- George Washington Law Review, 2023, v. 91, n. 6, p. 1555
- Article
43
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 1963, v. 28, n. 1, p. 100, doi. 10.2307/1190726
- Article